BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian
Beliefs
- Buddhist
- Catholic
- Contemplative
- Evangelical
- General Christian
- Hindu
- Jewish
- Latter-day Saint
- More Voices
- Muslim
- New Visions
- Pagan
- Progressive Christian
Topics
- Religion News
- Food and Religion
- Sports and Religion
- Religious Art
- Religious Music and Entertainment
- Religious Events
- History and Religion
- Style and Religion
- Politics and Religion
- Women in Religion
- Recreation Outdoors and Religion
- Business Finance and Religion
- Careers Workplace and Religion
- Education and Religion
- Family Parenting and Religion
- Health Fitness and Religion
- Home and Religion
- Relationships and Religion
- Technology and Religion
- Travel and Religion
Columnists
- Buddhist Columnists
- Business Finance and Religion Columnists
- Careers Workplace and Religion Columnists
- Catholic Columnists
- Contemplative Columnists
- Education and Religion Columnists
- Evangelists Columnists
- Family Parenting and Religion Columnists
- General Christian Columnists
- Health Fitness and Religion Columnists
- Hindu Columnists
- History and Religion Columnists
- Home and Religion Columnists
- Jewish Columnists
- More Voices Columnists
- Latter Day Columnists
- Muslim Columnists
- New Visions Columnists
- Nonreligious Columnists
- Pagan Columnists
- Politics and Religion Columnists
- Progressive Columnists
- Recreation Outdoors and Religion Columnists
- Relationships and Religion Columnists
- Religion News Columnists
- Religious Art Columnists
- Religious Events Columnists
- Religious Music and Entertainment Columnists
- Sports and Religion Columnists
- Style and Religion Columnists
- Technology and Religion Columnists
- Travel and Religion Columnists
- Women in Religion Columnists
Resource Library
- 2026 Calendar
- Library of World Religions
- The 100 Most Holy Places on Earth
- Patheos Answers
- Podcasts
- Videos
- Faith Leaders Database
- Anglican Episcopalian
- Bahai
- Baptist
- Buddhism
- Christianity
- Confucianism
- Eastern Orthodoxy
- Hinduism
- Holiness and Pentecostal
- ISKCON
- Islam
- Judaism
- Lutheran
- Methodist
- The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints
- New Age
- Paganism
- Presbytarian and Reformed
- Protestantism
- Religion Behind the Scenes
- Roman Catholic
- Scientology
- Shia Islam
- Sikhism
- Sufism
- Sunni Islam
- Taoism
- Zen
- See all religions
Research Tools
Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support
Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support
- Trending:
- Forgiveness
- |
- Marriage
- |
- Consciousness
- |
- Death Penalty
- |
- Election
- |
- Halloween
- Home
- Catholic
- Politics and Religion
- Just how far are we willing to “trust women”?
Just how far are we willing to “trust women”?
Last updated on: May 29, 2019 at 7:21 am by Jane the Actuary
Just how far are we willing to “trust women”? 2019-05-29T07:21:29-06:00 Jane the Actuary
Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

“Trust women.”
That’s what we’re told, time and again.
We should “trust” that there is no need to criminalize abortion at any point in time up until labor and delivery itself because:
Only a small percentage of abortions are performed after really starts to look at all human, or at any rate after viability, or certainly at that point in time when, in other circumstances the baby would simply be a little bit premature;
Because of the need to have put up with pregnancy for some time, and the added difficulty of a second-trimester, much less a third trimester abortion, women don’t just wait until that point for no particular reason at all;
There are real instances of women receiving diagnoses that their unborn babies have such severe defects that they would not survive much past birth, if at all; and
We should never be the judge of how much hardship, in the form of struggle and unhappiness due to a disabled child, is too much for a woman to bear —
therefore, in order not to harm women, we must hold firm to the belief that no such abortions ever occur without good, moral reasons.
But at the same time:
we know that mothers and fathers unjustly accused of child abuse, and their children, can suffer trauma when the child is removed from the home. In some cases, the families rack up tremendous sums in attorneys fees. Other cases result in children abused by the foster family they’re placed with. Maybe mom or dad is unjustly imprisoned on top of it all. Sometimes the report is of a child separated from his or her parents for so long relationships are difficult to rebuild.
So much harm done to families.
Maybe we should Trust Women.
Should we instead, Trust Women to discipline their children appropriately? Maybe if it seems necessary we might provide counseling services to troubled families. Perhaps the State should offer babysitting so that stressed parents can get out of the house, or perhaps the answer is to look at the root causes of child abuse and alleviate whatever is stressing out parents who might otherwise be at risk of abusing their children? But clearly jailing mothers is overly punitive when they probably couldn’t help it, anyway. And, besides, the best available data says that only 1,720 children died of abuse or neglect in 2017 anyway – that’s a tiny fraction of the population.
Except that sounds preposterous, doesn’t it? — because we recognize that infants, toddlers, preschoolers and schoolchildren’s lives are at stake.
And those who accept abortion and tell us to “trust women” simply don’t perceive that as the case when it comes to unborn children.
So, folks, you can have all the grand plans you want to “remedy the circumstances that drive women to abortion.” But when the abortion-rights side says “late abortions are very rare” or “I’m sure there’s always a good reason for them” — well, it’s a matter of hitting a brick wall. It’s not unlike time-travelling back to ancient Rome, where the patriarch had absolute power of life-and-death over his household, and trying to reason with a father that his right to choose to kill an unwanted newborn should be taken away. He’d look at you uncomprehendingly.
And, yes, I have buried the lede, in that the reason why I’m particularly discouraged at the moment is Illinois’s Reproductive Health Act, which passed the state house yesterday, and looks like it will be signed into law before the spring legislative session is over. This is the bill I wrote about back in March at The Federalist, though it appears (and I’m not entirely sure as there’s some funky stuff going on with amendments, per this link to the latest version) that instead of an utter-and-complete removal of any limits on abortion, that it preserves a nominal “life or health” exception after viability, but at the same time, “viability” is defined so narrowly (“a significant likelihood of a fetus’ sustained survival outside the uterus without the application of extraordinary medical measures”) that many preemies who now live would not be deemed viable. Oh, and of course, “health” means “all factors that are relevant to the patient’s health and well-being, including, but not limited to, physical, emotional, psychological, and familial health and age,” so that this is no real restriction at all, but that same “life or health” exception was there before, though accompanied by language that viable babies have to be aborted in the manner that best preserves their chance at life (even though that didn’t seem to be followed in practice anyway).
How much of an effect it will have, I can’t say. In Illinois, in 2017, there were 32,832 abortions reported, of which 100 were reported to have been at 20 – 23 weeks’ gestation. None were reported at greater than 24 weeks’ gestation, but 2,305 were classified as “gestation unknown” and no totals are shown for any reporting column with less than 50.
But the justification for this law at this point is really a matter of “we’ll show them.” If Alabama and Georgia are going to pass laws that extensively ban abortion, we’ll strike back with a law that goes as far as possible in the other direction. (There’s not much further you could go, short of offering a cash bonus to each woman who gets an abortion.) And I really can’t say, of those who believe that a small human has no legal or moral right to life until it takes that first breath, whether they truly believe that this is a meaningful moral difference, or are simply happy with drawing an arbitrary line.
Image: http://www.mountainhome.af.mil/News/Photos/igphoto/2000602500/ (public domain; US gov’t photograph)
Previous Post

May 21, 2019
Parsing Mayor Lightfoot's Inaugural Address
Next Post

June 6, 2019 Are the men of D-Day lost forever?
Browse Our Archives
Select a Category Actuarial/Retirement Issues Politics Uncategorized
Select a Month September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 December 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 August 2021 June 2021 April 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013
Follow Us!
TAKE THE
Religious Wisdom Quiz
What does the Bible say about giving?
Select your answer to see how you score.
Never give God loves a cheerful giver Give to get rich Only give under pressure
Related posts from Jane the Actuary
The ERA of 1972 no longer exists in...
What's A Pro-Life Illinoisan To do?
The Violinist vs. the Castaway, and an attempt...
On the end of Roe, and why I'm...
TRENDING AT PATHEOS Catholic
The Dangers of Gradual Accommodation (Winking at Sin)
Recently, the “law of gradualness” resurfaced during the opening of a weeklong,...
The Iron Gates and the Lion of the...
Yesterday, I didn't finish my report about, well, yesterday. So I'll...
Dolly Parton’s Last Song Wins Dove Award with...
Bluegrass band The Grascals, speaking on the red carpet at the 57th...
The Image: On the Horror of Capitalism and...
The Image Then went the Pharisees, and took counsel how they might...
We are approaching the date of our new American national holiday: October...
Letters on Living the Faith by C.S. Lewis
Most of us met C.S. Lewis as a public intellectual. Mere Christianity....
view all Catholic blogs
Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support
- About Us
- 2026 Calendar
- Videos
- Podcasts
- Library of World Religions
- Faith In Media Tracker
- Advertise With Us
- Write for Us
- Privacy Policy
- Terms of Service
- Do Not Sell My Data
- Contact Us
- Radiant Digital
- Manage Newsletter Subscriptions
- Unsubscribe From Notifications
- Sitemap
Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.
Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In










