Just when you think the Jussie Smollett case can’t make Chicago any more of a laughingstock . . .

Last updated on: March 26, 2019 at 3:51 pm by Jane the Actuary

Just when you think the Jussie Smollett case can’t make Chicago any more of a laughingstock . . . 2019-03-26T15:51:45-06:00 Jane the Actuary

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

In the news today at the Chicago Tribune (and pretty much everywhere else): “Mayor Emanuel blasts decision to drop charges against ‘Empire’ actor Jussie Smollett: ‘This is not on the level’.” The State’s Attorney’s office claims that “eh, he would have just gotten community service anyway and he’s a stand-up guy who already volunteers” (or, quoted rather than cynically paraphrased, “After reviewing all of the facts and circumstances of the case, including Mr. Smollett’s volunteer service in the community and agreement to forfeit his bond to the City of Chicago, we believe this outcome is a just disposition and appropriate resolution to this case”) is hard to swallow, especially when the record is being sealed for no identified reason and when the mayor and chief of police are (rightly) pissed, the police union had previously called for an investigation into whether Cook County State’s Attorney Kim Foxx had tried to interfere in the investigation, and when the events which transpired were (bearing in the usual caveats around “allegedly, etc.”) so egregious, with Smollett’s hate crime accusation tarring a city as prejudiced and with unbelievable numbers of man-hours spent reviewing footage to find the alleged perpetrators.

And the city is one week away from an election in which the two candidates are pretty much indistinguishable (do you vote for the progressive-identifying black grandmother or the progressive-identifying black female LGBTQ person?) except that one of them (yes, Lori Lightfoot) has taken on the mantle of reform and given her supporters reason to hope that she will fight against machine politics and the other (Toni Taxwinkle, I mean, Toni Preckwinkle) trying, near as I can tell, to get voters to overlook her pop tax and view her as the one who is capable of actually running the city based on her administrative experience as Cook County Board President.

And I’m told that the timing of the charge-dropping is entirely unconnected to the election, and it’s more of a spat between the state’s attorney’s office and the police, a means of sending a message of f*** you that the police will hear loud and clear.

But it makes me angry. It is in fact a week before an election in which voters have one choice to make and that’s whether to vote against the machine or not. (Again, these candidates are very similar, and, near as I can tell, their differences are not issues of overall principles.)

This action by Foxx’s office tells Chicago voters, “corruption is here to stay.” Will that boost Lightfoot’s chances? I worry that the opposite will happen, that Chicago voters will feel all the more resigned that everyone is corrupt, and your best bet is to be a beneficiary rather than a victim of corruption.

After all — well, readers, in my Prior Life as an actuary at a consulting firm, we needed to view an anti-corruption training session annually, not so much as actuaries, but because the actuarial business was just one part of a bigger whole that was focused on insurance brokerage and dealt with global clients. The message that was repeated over and over again was, essentially, “no, bribery is not just a ‘cost of doing business’ in various developing countries and even if you think that every else is doing it, it is not permitted for us to engage in it.” I am also reminded of various attempts to convince teenagers that, no, everyone else is not “doing it” (whether the “it” is having sex or drinking or doing drugs), because it matters so much whether they think of a particular behavior as simply the norm or not. And here, too, the same principle holds: the more inured Chicagoans are to corruption, the more tolerant they’ll be — and given that corruption has real, tangible costs, that’s a terrible outcome.

Image: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Wells_and_Adams_Street,_Chicago_Loop,_Chicago,_Illinois_(9181614950).jpg; By Ken Lund from Reno, Nevada, USA [CC BY-SA 2.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.0)], via Wikimedia Commons. Because, no, I don’t have a picture that illustrates corruption, let alone fake hate crime attacks.

Uncategorized

Chicago

corruption

Previous Post

March 21, 2019

The German Reformation, Part 2?

Next Post

March 27, 2019 So let's talk about anti-vaxxers, shall we?

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Actuarial/Retirement Issues Politics Uncategorized

Select a Month September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 December 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 August 2021 June 2021 April 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

I am a journey from Moab back to Bethlehem, marked by bitterness turned to blessing. What am I?

Select your answer to see how you score.

A widow's path Naomi's return A pilgrimage Ruth's journey