The story of the “third sex” bathrooms that . . . weren’t

Last updated on: February 15, 2019 at 8:35 pm by Jane the Actuary

The story of the “third sex” bathrooms that . . . weren’t 2019-02-15T20:35:33-06:00 Jane the Actuary

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

What, you ask, is the “third sex” or “third gender”?

It depends.

In Oregon, it’s a catchall category for “non-binary, intersex and agender people” who may now apply to have an X appear on their identity documents, including driver’s licenses. Retired soldier Jamie Shupe garnered headlines as the first such person to have one’s sex registered in this manner, after a court battle in 2016. Shupe, who had previously changed his sex to female and, while still in the Army, succeeded in his battle to change his military records to reflect a female designation, was subsequently honored, for instance as a USA Today Face of Pride in 2017. Subsequently, he began speaking against sex change surgeries, and in January of 2019, he announced that he “returned to [his] male birth sex” and wrote, “I no longer identify as a transgender or non-binary person and renounce all ties to transgenderism.” However, not all such driver’s license-changers are folk claiming alternate gender identities. Among the small number doing so at the time of the initial reporting were several intersex activists, that is, individuals for whom it was a matter of biological difference rather than identity.

In Ontario, likewise, as of 2018, “those born there [may] choose a nonbinary gender option on their birth certificate or remove the document’s gender marker altogether.” The province’s website explains that the new option “X” includes “Trans, Non-Binary, Two-Spirit, and Binary people and people who don’t want to disclose their gender identity” and the policy’s goal is “to reduce the risk of trans and non-binary people facing harassment or discrimination because their ID is not consistent with their gender identity.” The first such person to receive new documents under that policy, Joshua M. Ferguson, “identifies as neither male nor female.”

So when Breitbart wrote earlier this month that

Three new elementary schools around Munich in the German state of Bavaria are putting forth a proposal to create a bathroom for a “third gender” for children who do not identify as boys or girls.

you might reasonably think that the same sort of politics was behind it. But that’s not actually the case.

Here’s the Independent, reporting in 2017,

The highest court in Germany has ruled that a third sex must be included on official documents, becoming the first European country to make the change.
The Federal Constitutional Court has ordered the creation of a new term covering intersex people, using a “positive name for the sex” for birth certificates by the end of next year.

The ruling came after an intersex person, who is neither a man nor woman according to chromosomal analysis, brought a legal challenge after attempting to change their registered sex to “inter” or “divers”.

This followed an earlier approach, dating to 2013, in which parents of an intersex child were permitted to leave the “sex” box in the birth certificate blank.

And this past December, the Independent reported that the plans had been finalized, and CNN profiled several individuals who planned to take advantage of this change — both of whom, unlike Shupe or Ferguson, are intersex, and while CNN reports that trans activists rue this outcome, the German law is very narrowly defined to limit eligibility to intersex people.

Which brings us to the Brietbart report, which came from a Frankfurter Allgemeine story, which in turn came from a Münchner Merkur item which said that the issue of third-gender toilets was raised in three instances of elementary school planning in Munich suburbs. (Yeah, my first question was also, why would a country with such a low birth rate be building new schools?, but in the case of Taufkirchen and presumably likewise the others, this is a replacement for an older building.) The Merkur followed this up with an item expressing astonishment at the “media echo” for what they now stated was a few sentences in a committee meeting, and adding that experts told them that intersex children might not actually want a separate bathroom, because they’d rather fit in.

So did Breitbart miss the mark? My sense is that the prominence of trans activism has had the unfortunate result of placing, in common perception anyway, intersex people as some sort of subcategory of “differently-gendered people.”

In fact, surprisingly, the Intersex Society of North America (which disbanded in 2008), while it opposed surgery except in cases where the child is old enough to choose to do so, explicitly discouraged the notion of promoting a “third gender” for intersex children in its “frozen in time” 2008 website. The successor organization, Accord Alliance, adopts the terminology of transgender activists, saying, for example, “being a man or a woman is a matter of gender identity,” rejects the label “intersex” in favor of “person with a difference of sexual development,” and does not take a stance, that I could tell, on the “third sex”/”third gender” label.

So here’s what I’m thinking — and I say this as a nonexpert: it seems to be problematic, at the least, to lump together intersex folk and people of varying gender identities as if they were more or less the same, despite the fact that in the one case, the issue is with acceptance of people with physiological differences and, in particular, a pushback against the now discredited idea that such people require operations to look like the rest of us; and in the other case, the issue is with promoting the idea that people of other gender identities require surgery or other medical interventions for their well-being. I don’t know — and couldn’t get a sense from my reading — to what extent these two groups are banding together, and whether they see themselves as fundamentally more alike than different, or if they think it’s a matter of power in numbers.

Readers, what do you think?

Image: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File%3AHK_%E5%A0%85%E5%B0%BC%E5%9C%B0%E5%9F%8E_Kennedy_Town_%E5%A3%AB%E7%BE%8E%E9%9D%9E%E8%B7%AF%E5%B8%82%E6%94%BF%E5%A4%A7%E5%BB%88_Smithfield_Municipal_Services_Building_%E6%9B%B4%E8%A1%A3%E5%AE%A4_changing_room_Sept-2011.jpg; By Limysei1235 (Own work) [CC BY-SA 3.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0)], via Wikimedia Commons

Uncategorized

intersex

transgender

Previous Post

February 13, 2019

Outrage. Clicks. Readers, I have questions.

Next Post

February 18, 2019 It's time for Chicago politics!

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Actuarial/Retirement Issues Politics Uncategorized

Select a Month September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 December 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 August 2021 June 2021 April 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who said, "You are the Christ, the Son of the living God"?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Peter James Paul John