Patheos

BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Patheos

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

janetheactuary

Sacrificing babies

Last updated on: February 1, 2019 at 12:07 pm   by Jane the Actuary

Sacrificing babies 2019-02-01T12:07:28-06:00 Jane the Actuary

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

By Carin Araujo, http://www.prtc.net/~carin (Stock.xchng #197853) [Copyrighted free use], via Wikimedia Commons

To recap:  in my prior post, I wrote about the new New York law, and the bill in Virginia whose sponsor, Del. Kathy Tran, confirmed that it would enable a doctor, without any second opinion, to perform an abortion any time up until the child is born, upon a claim that doing so was necessary to preserve the mother’s mental health.  Virginia governor Ralph Northam confirmed his support, though with the claim that late-term abortions were always for the most serious of reasons; however, a 2013 Guttmacher study reported that late-term abortions happen for many reasons beyond health crises or “incompatible with life” deformities, including everything from less-severe disabilities to later-pregnancy changes in circumstances like a relationship break-up, or simply due to not knowing about the pregnancy earlier.

So when someone like Northam makes a statement like this, do they do so because they’re simply uninformed?  That’s the benefit-of-the-doubt-iest explanation.  But I am having a hard time with this explanation when Northam goes so far as to say this is universally true.  Even Planned Parenthood didn’t make that claim but was snakier about it, saying late-term abortions “often” are due to serious health risks or severe fetal abnormalities:

Abortions later in pregnancy are rare. They often result from a diagnosis of severe fetal abnormalities, or serious risks to a pregnant person’s health. This woman’s story shows how painful these situations can be: https://t.co/vemE8vAo8D 3/

— Planned Parenthood Action (@PPact) January 31, 2019

Yes, abortions later in pregnancy are rare, relative to all abortions.  But here’s an observation from Ramesh Ponnuru:

The Alan Guttmacher Institute’s most recent estimate for the number of abortions annually was 926,000, and its most recent estimate of the percentage of abortions performed after the twentieth week was 1.3 percent. That works out to about 12,000 late-term abortions. The FBI’s most recent estimate of annual gun homicides was 10,982.

Abortion rights supporters also like to make the argument that defining the level of severity necessary to permit late-term abortion, or requiring multiple doctors’ certification, place unnecessary hardship on women and/or show a lack of “trust” in women’s decision-making.

But consider for a minute the core claim that is being made.  It goes like this:

Of course we don’t believe that a fetus so close to birth as to be unmistakably human, who would survive if born and given medical treatment for prematurity, should be killed willy-nilly.  But in order to ensure women in these dire situations need not experience unnecessary hardship, we cannot place any legal restrictions on the procedure.

And consider, again, that claim that we must “trust women.”  The entire reason why we have a criminal code in the first place is because we cannot simply “trust” people not to commit crimes.  We criminalize murder.  Theft.  Rape.  Insider trading.  The buying and selling of heroin, meth, and other illegal drugs.

The only way this makes sense is if one believes that perfectly healthy unborn babies of perfectly healthy mothers, however close to full-term, must be sacrificed and cannot be granted legal protection, for the sake of women in these “hard cases” — or out of a general principle.  And the only way this makes sense is if, in the end, one believes that those babies are expendable.

But wait, you say – can’t these folks be reasoned with, by pointing out that it makes no sense to view a late-term unborn baby as having less moral worth, less “personhood” than a newborn?

I don’t think so.  I think in the end, if you believe in the claims we’re hearing Democrats make, you are probably also pretty OK with euthanasia.

So that’s where we are.  It’s a divide that’s far greater than “why should women have their lives disrupted for a clump of cells?”

Uncategorized

abortion

late-term abortion

Previous Post



January 30, 2019

In the news: more wins for abortion supporters

Next Post



February 3, 2019 How to tell it's Annual Catholic Appeal Time


Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Actuarial/Retirement Issues Politics Uncategorized

Select a Month September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 December 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 August 2021 June 2021 April 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013


Follow Us!

Follow Us on Facebook Follow Us on Twitter



TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who said, "Before Abraham was, I am"?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Peter John Jesus Paul

Related posts from Jane the Actuary

Family

The ERA of 1972 no longer exists in...

Jane the Actuary

Family

What's A Pro-Life Illinoisan To do?

Jane the Actuary

Family

The Violinist vs. the Castaway, and an attempt...

Jane the Actuary

Family

On the end of Roe, and why I'm...

Jane the Actuary

TRENDING AT PATHEOS Catholic

The Dangers of Gradual Accommodation (Winking at Sin)

Recently, the “law of gradualness” resurfaced during the opening of a weeklong,...

The Iron Gates and the Lion of the...

  Yesterday, I didn't finish my report about, well, yesterday.  So I'll...

Dolly Parton’s Last Song Wins Dove Award with...

Bluegrass band The Grascals, speaking on the red carpet at the 57th...

The Image: On the Horror of Capitalism and...

The Image Then went the Pharisees, and took counsel how they might...

Thoughts about Halloween

We are approaching the date of our new American national holiday: October...

Letters on Living the Faith by C.S. Lewis

Most of us met C.S. Lewis as a public intellectual. Mere Christianity....

view all Catholic blogs

Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube