Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Catholic
Politics and Religion
Now it’s my turn to mock the Green New Deal

Now it’s my turn to mock the Green New Deal

Last updated on: February 7, 2019 at 9:09 pm by Jane the Actuary

Now it’s my turn to mock the Green New Deal 2019-02-07T21:09:34-06:00 Jane the Actuary

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:WWII_USA_Ration_Book_3_Front.jpg; By Bill Faulk (Scan of original documents in collection of author) [Public domain], via Wikimedia Commons

Let me start with a story or two about World War II.

One visit home, we asked my parents what they remembered of the home front; both were born in ’39 so these would have been early-childhood memories. Neither of them had parents away fighting in the war (Mom’s dad was too old; Dad’s dad was in an essential-to-the-war-effort job), and nothing about it made any impression on Mom, but Dad remembers being sent out to buy groceries and losing the ration book along the way, which caused great trauma and I don’t really remember if he every described how it was resolved. (Yes, small children really were sent out to the store.)

Because, as you may or may not recall from history books or movies or television or family history, the manufacture of tanks and airplanes and Jeeps parachutes and military uniforms, and the production of food to be sent overseas came at a cost, as an endless array of food and consumer goods were rationed, with purchases strictly limited and families encouraged to grow food in “victory gardens” to make up for it. (Dad and his family were better off in that respect, because in addition to his dad’s factory job at Gates Rubber Factory, they had a small farm on which they grew produce and raised chickens. Unless, that is, the ration-ers knew that and subtracted this out.)

Tires were rationed, and gas was rationed. Clothing was rationed. Women’s nylons were rationed so they could make parachutes. Books were rationed (have you seen wartime books with the notice that they conform to rationing requirements?).

And this, so far as I can tell, is the future Alexandria Ocasio-Cortes envisions for us with her Green New Deal.

That being said, let’s look at the Green New Deal, as released today (or here, if the prior link becomes invalid) via a House resolution and a supporting FAQ document. It’s being defended in terms such as, “well, you have to understand that this is aspirational,” but even with that caveat it still makes no sense.

So let’s look at it, shall we?

The Green New Deal resolution a 10-year plan to mobilize every aspect of American society at a scale not seen since World War 2 to achieve net-zero greenhouse gas emissions and create economic prosperity for all.

“Mobilize.” “At a scale not seen since World War 2.” This is not voluntary.

This is a plan to get the United States to “net” 0 emissions [of greenhouse gasses], by means of “creat[ing] the renewable energy economy as fast as possible.” (I am guessing the “net” part means tree-planting carbon offsets, though it doesn’t specify.) This means eliminating “farting cows” and airplanes (though with the concession that this may take longer than 10 years; hence the “net” caveat), decommissioning nuclear plants as well as any energy source that is not “clean” and renewable, “retrofitting all buildings to be energy efficient,” “replac[ing] every combustion-engine vehicle,” “build[ing] out high-speed rail at a scale where air travel stops becoming necessary,” and more.

And all of this is to occur through direct government action. The government will pour incomprehensibly large sums of money into new R&D, the production of energy via solar and wind, the building-retrofit project, and so on. The intention appears to be a combination of ventures run by the government and those contracted out to other providers; the text speaks of extending credit and public banks, as if these projects will be profit making, which doesn’t make a heck of a lot of sense except to the extent that every building-owner would be mandated to front the cost of the building-rehab, new energy systems, etc., electricity-users ultimately pay for the cost of energy production with energy bills, and transportation bills far higher than at present, and so on.

How is it to be paid for?

Money-borrowing. Does AOC plan on this actually being money-printing? In World War II the government sold “victory bonds” and Marvel viewers will recall that Captain America was put to work pitching these.

But here’s the thing: issues of the government directing this massive undertaking in a command-economy fashion notwithstanding, do we even have the productive capacity to do this? To build the renewable-energy power plants on the scale needed? To electrify the miles of track needed (though high-speed or not, no rail can replace flight; all that can do so is stay-cationing and videoconferencing– with the actual outcome presumably being massively increasing the cost of air travel so only the wealthy and political elite can afford it, accompanied by sneering at people who can no longer afford to travel, as unsophisticated hicks)? To rip out and replace the heating system in every home, every office, every building in America?

One imagines that AOC’s comparison to World War II mobilization must necessarily extend to the same sorts of rationing, curtailing the availability of consumer goods, as during that war, in order to access the manpower and raw material needed — if, indeed, it is possible at all to generate solar and wind energy on such a scale (though, again, presumably the scale is curtailed by diminishing the amount of power used, as people can no longer to heat their homes to temperatures we consider comfortable, or to travel to locations we are no accustomed to traveling to, or maintain in any way the standard of living we’re accustomed to).

And, of course, that’s not even addressing the economy fantasy that she throws in:

Job guarantees with a “family-sustaining wage” as well as parental/medical leave, vacations, and “retirement security”, guaranteed higher education and trade school, “access to nature” (through Kraft durch Freude camps, maybe?), “healthy food,” “safe, affordable, adequate housing,” and — the real kicker — “economic security for all who are unable or unwilling to work.” Yes, that wasn’t a typo. Just because you don’t want to work doesn’t mean you shouldn’t have “economic security,” apparently.

They are living in a fantasy world. They have watched too much Star Trek, in which material abundance through replicators means that the only reason people work is for self-fulfillment (and presumably, down there on earth but not interesting enough to build into a plot, are large numbers of people who simply play video games all day).

As a bonus, they toss in statements that they will “work with farmers and ranchers to create a sustainable, pollution and greenhouse gas free, food system that ensures universal access to healthy food and expands independent family farming” — which, I suppose, is at least better than collective farms.

And, finally, they claim that 92% of Democrats and 64% of Republicans “support the Green New Deal,” which presumably means that some poll found that level of agreement for either a vaguely defined proposal or one that was presented as, well, substantially less delusional.

So this is a joke. And even for this to be labeled as “aspirational” says that AOC and her staffers are not serious. They’re playing at a game, no differently than college kids late at night, thinking that they are wise and have profoundly deep ideas that their elders never thought of. In reality, they ought to be embarrassed by this, because this is so full of nonsense that it destroys their credibility. And maybe they think they’re engaged in an exercise in “moving the Overton window,” that they can now come out with a less insane plan and be greeted as having moderated their demands, but they don’t deserve to be listened to at all after producing this.

Uncategorized

Green New Deal

Previous Post

February 6, 2019

Feelings don't care about your facts!

Next Post

February 13, 2019 On Baby Doe and Ralph Northam

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Actuarial/Retirement Issues Politics Uncategorized

Select a Month September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 December 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 August 2021 June 2021 April 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Multitudes of locusts came in waves—the cutting, swarming, hopping, and destroying locusts. What did this plague foreshadow?

Select your answer to see how you score.

A famine The day of the Lord An invasion God's wrath