Patheos

BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Patheos

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

janetheactuary

It’s MLK Day. Who should I hate?

Last updated on: January 28, 2019 at 3:25 pm   by Jane the Actuary

It’s MLK Day. Who should I hate? 2019-01-28T15:25:47-06:00 Jane the Actuary

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

V0050236 A fist-fight between Lord Brougham and Lord Melbourne as Pea
Credit: Wellcome Library, London. Wellcome Images
[email protected]
http://wellcomeimages.org
A fist-fight between Lord Brougham and Lord Melbourne as Peachum and Lockit. Coloured lithograph by H.B. (John Doyle), 1837.
1837 By: John DoylePublished: 22 October 1836
Copyrighted work available under Creative Commons Attribution only licence CC BY 4.0 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

That’s the way this works, isn’t it?

After all, on Saturday afternoon and evening, twitter and blogs  and news sites (about facebook I couldn’t say) gorged themselves on a feast of hate against a group of white, Catholic, southern, anti-abortion teen boys who ticked all their boxes to be presumed guilty in an encounter with a group of Native American protestors that was deemed to be “racist” and “harassing” and in which the kids were quoted as chanting “build the wall.”

Even their school and the bishop issued an apology, promising that the school “will take appropriate action, up to and including expulsion.”

Catholics, too, were quick to pile on, eager to prove that they were willing to criticize their own.

As the AP reported (here at the Washington Post):

Videos circulating online show a youth staring at and standing extremely close to Nathan Phillips, a 64-year-old Native American man singing and playing a drum.

Other students, some wearing Covington clothing and many wearing “Make America Great Again” hats and sweatshirts, surrounded them, chanting, laughing and jeering.

In a joint statement to the Cincinnati Enquirer , the Roman Catholic Diocese of Covington and Covington Catholic High School apologized to Phillips. Officials said they are investigating and will take “appropriate action, up to and including expulsion.” . . .

“When I was there singing, I heard them saying ‘Build that wall, build that wall,’” Phillips said, as he wiped away tears in a video posted on Instagram.

Subsequently, extended footage of the incident revealed that Phillips and his group approached the boys, not the reverse.  Students claim they had already been engaged in chanting school cheers, and there is no “build the wall” to be found.  Another one of Phillips’ group starts shouting at another one of the boys that they should “go back to Europe.”  Reason.com provides a detailed account of what the new video showed, and CNN chronicled it as well, though other sites such as USA Today, still give Phillips the last word, allowing him to claim “fear” due to the boys’ “hatred.”   The new video prompted some of the journalists and pundits who had so quickly condemned the boys, to backtrack, though others still insisted that the boys had the duty to retreat, that because their behavior did not conform to a Christlike idea, they remain at fault.  Here’s celebrity-priest James Martin:

Re #CovingtonHighSchool: I will be happy to apologize for condemning the actions of the students if it turns out that they were somehow acting as good and moral Christians. The last thing I want is to see Catholic schools and Catholic students held in any disrepute. 1/

— James Martin, SJ (@JamesMartinSJ) January 20, 2019

who in a 13-tweet thread is a bit squishy and squirmy but seems to affirm that unless there is conclusive proof otherwise, due to conflicting narratives, the boys remain condemned — that is, he stands by his original tweets:

I am as disgusted by the contemptuous laughter of the mass of students as I am moved by the quiet dignity of the solitary man who continues to chant. Those students could learn much from this elder, if they had chosen to. Or if they choose to. https://t.co/6i2buMmI8w

— James Martin, SJ (@JamesMartinSJ) January 19, 2019

(Note that there is a link in the first of these two tweets that doesn’t show here because it has since been deleted.)

And, of course, it’s not a surprise that everyone was eager to feast on this opportunity to spew out hate for these boys — tweets announced that they learned their hate at home, taught by their parents and by the hateful Catholic Church.

Readers, did you join in on this Two Minutes’ Hate?

Did you retweet tweets or share Facebook posts with the image of the white boy and the Native American man and take it as irrefutable proof that the boy was the aggressor, the man the victim?  Did you say he had a “punchable” face, or enjoy reading someone else’s claim to this effect?

Do you have one of those “Hate Has No Home Here” signs?

You do? Then go outside. Read it. Now come back in.

Guess what?

You’re a hater, too.

You might call it “righteous anger.”  But “righteous anger” is no better than any other kind of anger if it keeps us all divided, if even a day that’s effectively Martin Luther King, Jr., feast day is just another day for directing hate, with the only difference being that we ask ourselves, not “what would Jesus do?” but “who would MLK hate?” to identify our target.

 

Image:

V0050236 A fist-fight between Lord Brougham and Lord Melbourne as Pea
Credit: Wellcome Library, London. Wellcome Images
[email protected]
http://wellcomeimages.org
A fist-fight between Lord Brougham and Lord Melbourne as Peachum and Lockit. Coloured lithograph by H.B. (John Doyle), 1837.
1837 By: John DoylePublished: 22 October 1836
Copyrighted work available under Creative Commons Attribution only licence CC BY 4.0 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

 

Uncategorized

anger

Politics Red

Previous Post



January 19, 2019

Once more from the top: walls, negotiations, and trust

Next Post



January 21, 2019 Russia meddled. Media companies profitted. What will you do?


Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Actuarial/Retirement Issues Politics Uncategorized

Select a Month September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 December 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 August 2021 June 2021 April 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013


Follow Us!

Follow Us on Facebook Follow Us on Twitter



TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What sign does Paul give in 2 Thessalonians as his authentic mark in every letter?

Select your answer to see how you score.

His signature His seal A special blessing His greeting in his own handwriting

Related posts from Jane the Actuary

Family

Guest post: When Liberal Catholicism Becomes Toxic, or,...

Jane the Actuary

Family

Can we have nice things after all? Nathan...

Jane the Actuary

Family

Hubris (Trump, Pelosi, etc.)

Jane the Actuary

Family

Russia meddled. Media companies profitted. What will you...

Jane the Actuary

TRENDING AT PATHEOS Catholic

Westminster Abbey-- Part One

In one sense walking into Westminster Abbey is like walking down the...

'Super Scam Me' Exposes AI Jon Bon Jovi...

Leslie Pickett believed she was in a relationship with Jon Bon Jovi....

The Brazilian Remake of Kendricks' 'Flywheel' Opens in...

“Flywheel,” the story that launched the Kendrick Brothers’ filmmaking career is getting...

The Dangers of Gradual Accommodation (Winking at Sin)

Recently, the “law of gradualness” resurfaced during the opening of a weeklong,...

The Iron Gates and the Lion of the...

  Yesterday, I didn't finish my report about, well, yesterday.  So I'll...

The Image: On the Horror of Capitalism and...

The Image Then went the Pharisees, and took counsel how they might...

view all Catholic blogs

Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube