Atheist professor explains the doctrine of the Immaculate Conception

Last updated on: December 7, 2018 at 1:53 pm by Jane the Actuary

Atheist professor explains the doctrine of the Immaculate Conception 2018-12-07T13:53:15-06:00 Jane the Actuary

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

OK, now I’ve seen it all from twitter.

As Campus Reform (and other sources) reported, an atheist professor from Minnesota State University, Mankato, Eric Sprankle, thought he was going to own the Christians with respect to the Incarnation, when he tweeted the following:

The virgin birth story is about an all-knowing, all-powerful deity impregnating a human teen. There is no definition of consent that would include that scenario. Happy Holidays.

— Eric Sprankle, PsyD (@DrSprankle) December 3, 2018

In response to replies that Mary indeed gave her consent in the scriptural account, he followed up:

The biblical god regularly punished disobedience. The power difference (deity vs mortal) and the potential for violence for saying “no” negates her “yes.” To put someone in this position is an unethical abuse of power at best and grossly predatory at worst.

— Eric Sprankle, PsyD (@DrSprankle) December 4, 2018

And in doing so, unwittingly explained the doctrine of the Immaculate Conception.

After all, let’s face it, most people, especially most non-Catholics, don’t really understand what it’s all about, and think it refers to the conception of Christ, rather than the idea that Mary was herself conceived (while in an ordinary human way) without original sin, and was preserved sinless. Why on earth would it be necessary to add on another layer that Mary was sinless? Protestants have a hard time with this, since it all just seems a bit weird and unbiblical. And this doctrine isn’t necessarily explained particularly well; some explanations (see this one by Catholic Answers) describe it in a way that tends to sound more like “God did a nice thing for Mary.”

But if you look at Sprankle’s objection, it falls apart if Mary, being free from sin, was uniquely enabled to give her consent without fear of the Almighty. And given that I’d always found this one of the less-compelling doctrines of the church, I’m pleased as punch that out of all of this Me Too-ism comes an amazing, if unintended, explanation.

Image: Queen Of Heaven; https://www.maxpixel.net/Queen-Of-Heaven-Iconography-Virgin-Mary-Religion-2176697

Uncategorized

Immaculate Conception

Mary

Me Too

Previous Post

December 6, 2018

George Bush and the Communion of Saints

Next Post

December 12, 2018 Let me tell you about multiemployer pensions (and a whole host of related gripes)

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Actuarial/Retirement Issues Politics Uncategorized

Select a Month September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 December 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 August 2021 June 2021 April 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who was killed for touching the Ark of the Covenant?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Shimei Uzzah Ahio Abinadab