What to do in a “none of the above” election

Last updated on: October 4, 2018 at 3:56 pm by Jane the Actuary

What to do in a “none of the above” election 2018-10-04T15:56:13-06:00 Jane the Actuary

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Two items in the news today:

first, a report that, whaddayaknow, Rauner’s ad about Pritzker’s toilet-removing tax-cheating scheme was not just fake news: “Cook County watchdog says ‘scheme to defraud’ saved Pritzker $330,000 in property taxes”

Billionaire Democratic governor candidate J.B. Pritzker improperly received $330,000 in property tax breaks on one of his Gold Coast mansions as part of a “scheme to defraud” taxpayers, Cook County’s top watchdog concluded.

Inspector General Patrick Blanchard’s finding came in a report issued after his office looked into whether Pritzker’s relationship with Assessor Joe Berrios played a role in Pritzker’s property taxes being lowered.

During the investigation, Blanchard found that Pritzker’s wife, M.K. Pritzker, asked a contractor in 2015 to remove the mansion’s five toilets to make the home uninhabitable so it could be reassessed at a lower value. M.K. Pritzker’s brother and her personal assistant later made “false representations” in sworn affidavits to the assessor about the mansion’s condition and when the toilets were removed, Blanchard found.

Separately, an op-ed: “If Pritzker won’t share his tax plan, we Democrats shouldn’t support him,” authored by James K. Genden of the Evanston Democratic Party. Citing the fact that Pritzker refuses to provide any details whatsoever about his tax plan, other than vague claims that it’s solely intended to soak the rich, and referencing Pritzker’s tremendous inherited wealth, and the fact that he has never held public office nor even run a company which required compromise, always only being the absolute owner able to dictate the decisions, he calls for fellow Democrats to demand of Pritzker that he reveal the details of his tax plan.

A strong statement from progressive Democrats that we expect more transparency and forthrightness from our leadership — made now in the final weeks of the campaign — will make headlines and resonate loud and clear. Pritzker should know that we are not to be taken for granted, and that in future years he will need our support. He should recognize that his large lead in the polls reveals more about public rejection of Rauner than any enthusiasm for Pritzker. Indeed, it is astonishing that — given such a weak opponent, and after such extraordinary expenditures on advertising — the polls still show that substantially less than a majority of voters have decided to support him.

Strong action is required and there is little time. We need to do something now if we want to ensure that Pritzker takes office as a governor who respects the democratic process, who is honest and forthright and is open to dialogue with the public.

But the reality is that this is wishful thinking. Pritzker is so far ahead of Rauner (the latest polling, from the Illinois Broadcasters Association, shows Pritzker far ahead, at 44% to 27%, with 14% undecided, 10% choosing a minor party candidate, and 4% saying “none of the above,” and Wikipedia’s list of polls shows that this is consistent with past polling as well) that he faces no real risk of losing this election; or, at any rate, I myself have a hard time imagining him losing so many votes on account of the toilet-seat tax-cheat scandal or his refusal to provide details on his tax plan, that Rauner can make up this massive gap.

But consider this: Rauner has been making the pitch pretty much ever since he was elected that he can’t be held accountable for things that have gone wrong in Springfield because of the barriers Mike Madigan has put up and the control that he and Cullerton exercise over the state House and Senate. And he’s not entirely wrong.

After all, do you know who’s running for State Representative and State Senator in your district? Here in my Senate district, the incumbent is a Republican, and I suppose I must live in a competitive district because his Democratic opponent is sending us mailers on a regular basis, telling me that she’ll “clean up Springfield” and claiming that her opponent supports easy availability of guns. (The State House race must not be as competitive, judging by the mail.)

Will the Representative and Senator you vote for push for reform? If you vote Democrat, will your candidate return Madigan and Cullerton to their leadership roles? Will he or she vote for legislation on party lines? When bills come up promising to spend money the state doesn’t have, will you protest? If you vote Republican, will your candidate attempt to persuade others to support reform, or just sit on the sidelines proclaiming that powerlessness justifies inaction? Will you support a constitutional amendment enabling the state to reform pensions? Will you circulate petitions?

This matters, and is all the more important with a man like Pritzker headed for the governor’s office.

After all, consider Gov. Rauner’s slogan, on the yard signs which admittedly I haven’t seen in any yards but only in the campaign office I drove by the other day:

“Rauner — Home is Worth Fighting For”

Regardless of who is elected governor in November (ha! Who am I kidding?), Illinoisians of all stripes are not consigned to a fate of unchecked power by Madigan and Pritzker. It may take a lot more work to fight against spending sprees and tax hikes, or to demand pension reform, but it’s still possible, and, in fact, necessary to fight for our home — for those of us who stick around in the state, anyway.

Image: Illinois state capitol; https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Illinoiscapitol2.jpg

We want to know what you think about the upcoming midterm elections. Vote in our poll below!

Uncategorized

Bruce Rauner

J.B. Pritzker

Previous Post

October 2, 2018

Why is the Kavanaugh nomination tearing us apart?

Next Post

October 7, 2018 No, you can't change the 2-Senators-per-state Constitutional provision

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Actuarial/Retirement Issues Politics Uncategorized

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 December 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 August 2021 June 2021 April 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What mountain was the site of Elijah's showdown with Baal's prophets?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Mount Carmel Mount Tabor Mount Sinai Mount Hermon