Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Catholic
Politics and Religion
What about Jamal Khashoggi?

What about Jamal Khashoggi?

Last updated on: October 19, 2018 at 12:47 pm by Jane the Actuary

What about Jamal Khashoggi? 2018-10-19T12:47:17-06:00 Jane the Actuary

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

What should we make of the killing of Jamal Khashoggi, the Saudi journalist-activist?

Here are three observations:

The enemy of my enemy is not always my friend.

Turkey is behaving, well, suspiciously, in its actions here. As Hot Air reports, Turkey has asserted repeatedly that it has ironclad evidence that not only did the Saudis kill Khashoggi, but that they did so in a particularly gruesome manner, but at the same time, Turkey refuses to share any of its evidence. They certainly have their own agenda here, and it’s not the furtherance of democracy in the Middle East. They are instead more keenly interested in using this to their political advantage — whether it’s a power play against the Saudis in general or against Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman specifically, and whether there are connections to the overall “cold war” in the Arab world/Mideast, as this Federalist article suggests.

Which means that we should be careful before lapping up Turkey’s narrative, and avoid doing what Turkey wants us to do.

Yes, it’s bad that the Saudis (almost certainly) killed Khashoggi. But we shouldn’t add to the outrage because he was “an American.”

Khashoggi was a Saudi journalist who lived in any number of places during his lifetime. In September 2017, he acquired a U.S. green card through, apparently, some political connections.

Here’s the Washington Post, reporting on events chronologically; after becoming a Post columnist in September 2017,

Friends helped Khashoggi obtain a visa that allowed him to stay in the United States as a permanent resident.

Who were these “friends”? This is not reported as a visa obtained by the Post as his employer. The Conservative Review suggests that this was line-skipping due to connections to Saudi billionaires who were themselves connected to U.S. government officials. A reader at Daily Kos comments that Khashoggi’s fiance was a Turkish resident, with no intention to live anywhere else. Was Khashoggi establishing a residence in Turkey? Continuing to globe-trot? Was the U.S. green card intended to enable him to split to the U.S. without needing to trouble himself with seeking a visa at a later point in time? Was it intended, by himself or his sponsors, as a means of placing him under the individual equivalent of a U.S. “nuclear umbrella”, with those sponsors intending to place the U.S. in a position of being obliged to object to any future imprisonment just as much as a “real” U.S. national? Maybe this is just standard practice; I don’t know

There is no obvious U.S. response.

One reads calls for the U.S. to impose some sort of sanctions in this case, or to cancel weapons contracts, or cut off diplomatic relations. But does that really make sense? Is there a specific behavior of the Saudis that we are attempting to change in the future, with some metric by which we’ll know they’ve changed it? That’s what sanctions are intended for — we demand a nation end its nuclear weapons development program, or remove its army from a third country, or stop persecuting an ethnic minority.

Setting aside the relatively small possibility that this was Henry II and Thomas Becket all over again, and that MBS did not really intend to murder JK, let’s consider this:

Justice in Sharia law is very transactional, isn’t it? Murders can compensate the victim’s family rather than being jailed.

Here’s Wikipedia on the matter:

Families of someone unlawfully killed can choose between demanding the death penalty or granting clemency in return for a payment of diyya, or blood money, by the perpetrator. There has been a growing trend of exorbitant blood-money demands, for example a sum of $11 million was reported as being recently demanded. Saudi officials and religious figures have criticized this trend and said that the practise of diyya has become corrupted.

So on the one hand, he has certainly revealed to anyone who thought otherwise, that he has no particular interest in human rights but that, like China, he’s more keen on advancing national interests and we would be as mistaken to see a commitment to women’s rights in their new permission to drive as we would be in seeing a concern about the well-being of the Chinese people eventually extending to human rights, in the Chinese government’s interest in economic prosperity. But at the same time, one presumes that he really viewed his actions as simply within the norm for acceptable behavior for a Saudi monarch. Khashoggi was not just a Saudi citizen, but highly connected with the royal family, and it’s not as if the Saudis haven’t committed extrajudicial killings before, or judicial killings based on unfair trials and for actions which any reasonable outsider would not only deem non-capital offenses, but not even crimes to begin with.

But what if we used the Saudi justice transactionality and used it to tell MBS, “these are our requirements, to compensate for a U.S. green card holder being killed”? What if we demanded that, in response to this sordid affair, they boost their refugee camp funding, release specific political/religious prisoners, etc. If we’re daring, we might call on him to repeal the requirement that all women have male “guardians.”

That’s the only way forward that I really see here.

What about you?

Image: https://pixabay.com/en/mecca-mekkah-saudi-arabia-saudi-66970/.

Uncategorized

Jamal Khashoggi

Saudi Arabia

Previous Post

October 16, 2018

Coming soon to TV commercials: drug prices?

Next Post

October 21, 2018 A housekeeping update to readers

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Actuarial/Retirement Issues Politics Uncategorized

Select a Month September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 December 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 August 2021 June 2021 April 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

True or False: Paul taught the Galatians that circumcision is necessary for salvation.

Select your answer to see how you score.

FALSE TRUE