Synod update – well, actually, not so much

Last updated on: October 12, 2018 at 11:18 am by Jane the Actuary

Synod update – well, actually, not so much 2018-10-12T11:18:33-06:00 Jane the Actuary

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

So here’s the deal: when the Synod of Bishops first started, I had expected that I would watch the reports and keep up with the news coming out of Rome, and type up little summaries as a way of both sharing things with readers and digesting the information itself.

But here’s what I’ve learned: there’s not much to share.

The information being shared officially is bland. “Young people want to be listened to.” “Young people want a personal connection to their priests and bishops.” “Young people expect priests and bishops to set a good example rather than just lecturing them.” “Young people want to be involved in care for the environment and other issues.” “We need to do more to help migrants (whose needs are slotted into the synod because they are predominantly young adults).” Blah blah blah. Talk about sports and social media. And one quote that was floating around was a recap of a discussion of “young people like ‘praise music.’ But some young people are into chant. Well, whatever, they want music that sounds good and isn’t bland.”

And an article at the National Catholic Register last week reports that the lack of information is intentional — with the rationale either being to allow participants to speak freely without worries of misinterpretation or, alternatively, because synod participants (who, remember, are bishops) simply don’t accept church teaching and want to be able to voice their dissent openly.

But that same article also discusses the possibility that the synod document that will be voted on at the end of the event might contain some unwelcome declaration:

The issue is significant as many believe this synod is being subtly used as a vehicle for introducing heterodoxy and, in particular, acceptance of the ‘LGBT’ homosexual agenda in the Church (the term was controversially used in the synod’s working document). Observers also believe this issue will find its way into the final document which, for the first time under new rules, could become part of the papal magisterium depending on the Pope’s approval. According to some sources, the main substance of that document is actually already written, hence the lack of transparency, the absence of a mid-term report, and ambiguities over voting procedures at the end of the synod.

Possibly connected have been words from Cardinal Gualtiero Bassetti, president of the Italian bishops’ conference and known to be close to Pope Francis, who said Oct. 5 that he is “convinced that Pope Francis will give us some surprise” and “will for sure invent something before the conclusion of the Synod.”

This creeps me out, honestly, and all the more so given the Register’s report on the synod participants who have been chosen to write the final document. At the same time, I don’t like the fact that there is so little information available.

So on the one hand, it seems rather possible that the outcome will be a distinctly non-theological document, full of “best practices” with the sort of hodgepodge of ideas of “Things The Youth Want” and “Ways We Can Get Them To Come Back/Stay Here” that comes with input from hundreds of people, with various social justice messages thrown in for good measure, but without any real, meaningful content. On the other hand, given the secretiveness of the whole process, it seems just as likely that people with an agenda can drive this towards a document which can garner enough votes, due to the nature of the selection of bishops and due to strategy and politics, which does either declare some wholly new teaching or deliberately aims to set the church on the path towards such by means of some ambiguous wording.

And it reminds me of Ross Douthat’s description of the prior synod, on the family, in which he says that the pope had “stacked the deck” in terms of attendees, in order to produce a document that signed off on removing the church’s teaching on the indissolubility of marriage, but that the mid-conference report generated such outrage and the paragraphs on such in the final report couldn’t get the necessary votes.

Which suggests that the lack of the mid-conference report and the fact that the voting process is unclear, at best, could well be a set-up for enabling liberals to push through their doctrine-changing agenda. Whether it will be, we won’t know — but by the time we do know, it may be too late.

Image: from Flickr: https://www.flickr.com/photos/113018453@N05/14037472464

Uncategorized

Pope Francis

Youth Synod

Previous Post

October 10, 2018

"Divinely Renovating" the Catholic Church - the catch!

Next Post

October 13, 2018 Limp wrists and coddled minds

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Actuarial/Retirement Issues Politics Uncategorized

Select a Month September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 December 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 August 2021 June 2021 April 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What was an ephah's volume? (Biblical Measurement)

Select your answer to see how you score.

22 liters 30 liters 10 liters 15 liters