Patheos

BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Patheos

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

janetheactuary

There are (literally) no words for what’s going on in Gaza

Last updated on: May 16, 2018 at 2:13 pm   by Jane the Actuary

There are (literally) no words for what’s going on in Gaza 2018-05-16T14:13:38-06:00 Jane the Actuary

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Gaza in more ordinary times

Is what’s going on in Gaza at the moment a “protest”?  No.   Protestors march around yelling chants in order for those whom they’re angry at to see their anger and their numbers.

Is it a “riot”?  No.  That’s uncontrolled chaos with the goal of causing destruction, either truly for no reason at all, or as a means of causing harm to some disfavored group (Korean shopkeepers, for instance).

Is it a military incursion?  It’s a challenge to use this vocabulary when there is no organized military leading a charge, and when the attackers seem to have no realistic expectation of breaching the barrier, but, rather, have the objective of creating sympathy by deaths of some among their number.

Is it a mass suicide endeavor?  That would seem to require that those involved, not just the planners, have suicide in mind.

Should we just be vague and call it an “action” at the border?  No, the Germans used that label for their Aktions already.

I am coming to believe that the lack of a label for what they’re up to, is a real problem.  Since we can’t adequately describe it, we fall back on words that fail to appropriately capture what’s going on.  It’s not far removed from newspaper headlines like “train kills man” which turn out to be suicide-by-train but suggest to the casual reader that the engineer / train line is somehow at fault.  And so, too, we have headlines such as “Israelis kill more than 50 Palestinians in Gaza protests, health officials say,” in Monday’s Washington Post, which gives the impression that Israel was somehow the instigator.

Here’s some text from that article:

Some young men brought knives and fence cutters. At a gathering point east of Gaza City, organizers urged protesters over loudspeakers to burst through the fence, telling them Israeli soldiers were fleeing their positions, even as they were reinforcing them. . . .

A truck rolled past carrying young men chanting: “To Jerusalem we go with millions of martyrs” and “Death rather than humiliation.”

Drones dropped canisters of tear gas, sending crowds fleeing. Other drones dropped leaflets that urged demonstrators to say back from the fence. . . .

While some said they would abide by official calls to keep the demonstrations peaceful, others talked about their enthusiasm to break into Israel and wreak havoc.

“We are excited to storm and get inside,” said 23-year-old Mohammed Mansoura. When asked what he would do inside Israel, he said, “Whatever is possible, to kill, throw stones.”

Two other young men carried large knives and said they wanted to kill Jews on the other side of the fence.

The Israeli military brought two extra brigades to the Gaza border in preparation for the demonstrations and added additional “defense lines” in an effort to prevent any mass invasion into Israeli communities near the border.

The military said at least 40,000 people protested in 13 places along the fence — more than twice as many locations as in past weeks of protest.

Other reports say that Hamas itself is claiming 50 of the 62 dead as Hamas militants, that Gazans used Facebook to encourage young men to come to the border prepared to kidnap Israelis, and that rioters damaged a border crossing and gas line used to provide materials and heat to the people of Gaza.  And, as a reminder, this has nothing to do with the opening of the US embassy, but rather with the 70th anniversary of the founding of the state of Israel; it was merely that the US embassy’s opening was timed to coincide with these celebrations.

New York Times columnist Michelle Goldberg writes alongside a chorus of others, that the response of the Israeli army is “disproportionate” because those attempting to cross the border don’t “pose an imminent threat.”  But what is Israel to do?  Wait until individual Gazans rush Israeli soldiers?  Or chase after them if they rush into the neighboring villages?  Is there some sort of obligation to wait for these men, who have already proclaimed their intention to kill, to start stabbing, before they can respond?  And before you say, “yes, they should no more be shot than an American police officer should shoot someone,” consider that this is an attack, even if it’s one we don’t have the right vocabulary and concepts for.

Now, as a side note, I’ll admit that it does seem a bit peculiar that Israel has built a literal wall to prevent incursions from the West Bank area, but that the border with Gaza appears to consist of extensive barbed-wire fencing.  It stands to reason, after all, that a barbed-wire fence at least gives the illusion of being breach-able, in a way that a concrete barrier wouldn’t.  But, on the other hand, Hamas’s response up to this point has been tunnelling, not wire-cutting.

And, as a further reminder, no, I don’t have an answer on the larger question, and, in particular, Gaza seems to be particularly ****ed.

UPDATE:  here’s a link to share with you, “The Unfixable Tragedy of Gaza.”  Can they govern themselves?  Not likely.  Does someone else want to govern them?  No.  Can they just all be located?  Nope.  Hence, the “unfixable” of the headline.

Ideally, since it is cut off physically from the West Bank, Gaza would become an independent, self-sufficient nation-state of its own — a goal that Hamas claims to desire. But its small size, poverty, dysfunction, and radicalized population all make that a dim prospect for the foreseeable future.

 

Image:  image: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File%3AGaza_Beach.jpg; By Gus at Dutch Wikipedia (Transferred from nl.wikipedia to Commons.) [Public domain], via Wikimedia Commons

Uncategorized

Gaza

Previous Post



May 12, 2018

Starbucks schadenfreude - and a serious "unintended consequences" issue

Next Post



May 20, 2018 Do we need American Exceptionalism?


Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Actuarial/Retirement Issues Politics Uncategorized

Select a Month September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 December 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 August 2021 June 2021 April 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013


Follow Us!

Follow Us on Facebook Follow Us on Twitter



TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

According to 2 Peter, what are believers partakers of?

Select your answer to see how you score.

God's kingdom Christ's sufferings The divine nature Eternal glory

Related posts from Jane the Actuary

Family

An update (sort of) on Gaza

Jane the Actuary

Family

A September 11th Reflection

Jane the Actuary

Family

Illinois’ Assisted Suicide Law is, yes, literally deadly

Jane the Actuary

Family

Revising the "Disability [Pride] Flag"

Jane the Actuary

TRENDING AT PATHEOS Catholic

The Iron Gates and the Lion of the...

  Yesterday, I didn't finish my report about, well, yesterday.  So I'll...

Dolly Parton’s Last Song Wins Dove Award with...

Bluegrass band The Grascals, speaking on the red carpet at the 57th...

The Image: On the Horror of Capitalism and...

The Image Then went the Pharisees, and took counsel how they might...

Thoughts about Halloween

We are approaching the date of our new American national holiday: October...

Letters on Living the Faith by C.S. Lewis

Most of us met C.S. Lewis as a public intellectual. Mere Christianity....

When Halloween Unmasks Married Hearts

Written by Dr. David K. Ewen from Eternal Truth Bible College Behind...

view all Catholic blogs

Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube