Three things about Emma Gonzalez, accused ostracizer

Last updated on: March 27, 2018 at 7:46 pm by Jane the Actuary

Three things about Emma Gonzalez, accused ostracizer 2018-03-27T19:46:02-06:00 Jane the Actuary

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Earlier today, I saw a snippet of a speech by Emma Gonzalez, emerging gun control activist, in which she spoke of “ostracizing” the school shooter. When I first saw this, I assumed it was from this past weekend’s march/rally, but it turns out that it was from a rally back in February, and I was able to find a full transcript of the speech. Here’s the key paragraph:

So many signs that the Florida shooter was mentally disturbed, even expelled for bad and erratic behavior. Neighbors and classmates knew he was a big problem. Must always report such instances to authorities again and again. We did, time and time again. Since he was in middle school, it was no surprise to anyone who knew him to hear that he was the shooter. Those talking about how we should have not ostracized him, you didn’t know this kid. OK, we did. We know that they are claiming mental health issues, and I am not a psychologist, but we need to pay attention to the fact that this was not just a mental health issue. He would not have harmed that many students with a knife.

So what do you make of this? It’s complicated.

In the first place, there is consensus among both the “gun safety” and the “gun rights” advocates that Cruz should not have had access to guns. Gun rights advocates believe this would have been avoided had the school and the police not adopted an approach towards troublemaking students of, well, ignoring the problem. If Cruz had been arrested for any of a long list of “arrest-able” offenses, he would not have had the clean record that enabled him to pass a background check and acquire his guns. “Gun safety” advocates, in contrast, are saying, alternately, that his age should have precluded any firearms purchase at all, or that neither he nor anyone else should have access to guns with “large capacity magazines,” however defined, or that we should follow the approach of Japan and grant firearms ownership only to those who have proven that they are morally upstanding citizens.

But with respect to the mental health issue, not long ago CNN reported that the father of one of the victims had encouraged students to “walk up not out”:

Ryan Petty, the father of one of the students killed in last month’s shooting at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School, has proposed an alternative to the school walkouts being held around the country Wednesday.

He is urging people to “walk up,” not out.

“Instead of walking out of school in March 14, encourage students to walk up,” he posted on Twitter. “Walk up to the kid who sits alone at lunch and invite him to sit with your group; walk up to the kid who sits quietly in the corner of the room and sit next to her. … Walk up to your teachers and thank them; walk up to someone who has different views than you and get to know them — you may be surprised at how much you have in common.”

This provoked substantial backlash. Website The Mighty summarized the complaints: the idea appears to place “being kind” as an alternative to gun control rather than doing both; this is “blaming the victim” for suggesting that these kids were to blame for being mean; and, finally, kids who eat alone are being stereotyped as future school shooters.

Is this right? Is this wrong? I certainly don’t believe that any one kid, or any group of kids, can “fix” a severely troubled kid by being nicer to them. And, whether in the context of “stopping future school shootings” or just being decent people, I don’t see how we can expect children to meet our ideals of reaching out to the lonely, ideals that we adults are no more likely to meet. After all, think about it: when was the last time you approached someone who appeared to seem out-of-place or a little lost at some sort of social event, say, a meet-and-greet or a lunch at some sort of conference? And to expect this of kids who had by this point seen numerous instances of disruptive, violent behavior? That’s not realistic.

And consider Gonzalez’s words: we knew he was trouble, we reported him, no one did anything. We ostracized him, but can you blame us?

Yet, even knowing that she was referring to a student who, as an adult, killed 17 people, I keep reading these words and struggling with them. Yes, being ostracized is, strictly speaking, not the same thing as being bullied, and some kids are perfectly happy to be ostracized by the majority of the student body, if they’re introverts or if they have one or two close friends, and virtually no kids, no matter how poorly they’re treated in middle or high school, go on to kill anyone.

But it’s still pretty lousy.

The other day, my son reported that a friend of his, who he recognizes is not as mature as the other kids in the 5th grade classroom and gets upset easily, was being bullied by the other kids — not in the “give me your lunch money” sort of way, but in a more subtle way, since the kids had discovered what buttons to push to get him upset, and pushed those buttons. The assistant principal came in and had a long talk with the kids, he reports.

And these scenes happen regularly, at schools everywhere. We can’t make kids be nice to other kids, or be friends with those whose company isn’t enjoyable. But it stinks to be that kid.

Image: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Trump-WomensMarch_2017-top-1510075_(32409710246).jpg

Previous Post

March 22, 2018

Update on a personal project

Next Post

April 1, 2018 Good Friday: The Most (and Least) Catholic Liturgy

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Actuarial/Retirement Issues Politics Uncategorized

Select a Month September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 December 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 August 2021 June 2021 April 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

How many years did Solomon's temple construction take?

Select your answer to see how you score.

5 years 7 years 6 years 10 years