Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Catholic
Politics and Religion
Whose fault is the Nazi GOP candidate?

Whose fault is the Nazi GOP candidate?

Last updated on: February 6, 2018 at 4:33 pm by Jane the Actuary

Whose fault is the Nazi GOP candidate? 2018-02-06T16:33:09-06:00 Jane the Actuary

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

In the news today, a literal Nazi will be on the ballot as the Republican candidate in Illinois’ 3rd district this fall. Not because actual Republicans support him, but because Illinois’ laws around primaries enabled the crackpot, a man named Arthur Jones, to get on the ballot with a mere 603 signatures, according to CNN. which also reported that the state Republican organization is now trying to come up with a work-around, such as declaring a write-in candidate to be the “official” Republican candidate.

That this is even an issue is a consequence of this district being deemed a “safe” district, so completely in the Democrats’ hands that it’s not even worth attempting to contest it. This is the seat of Chicagoan Dan Lipinski, who ran unopposed in 2016 after the Republicans were successfully able to remove Jones from the ballot after his first attempt at contesting this election and no other Republican filed in the primary. In 2014, he defeated his GOP opponent 65% to 35%. Incidentally, the shape of this district is the outcome of a Democratically-orchestrated gerrymander, with a solid Democrat core in the city and then extending out to sparsely populated areas to the southwest of the city to render their GOP votes useless.

And this is not the only district where incumbents run unopposed, so I thought it would be instructive to look at the districts via Ballotpedia.

1st district: heavily Democrat; Bobby Rush won with 74% of the vote in 2016 and 73% in 2014, but in both cases faced Republican opponents.

2nd district: Democrat Robin Kelly won with nearly 80% of the vote in 2016 and 2014, in both cases facing Republican opponents.

4th: Democrat Luis Gutierrez, known for his district connecting two heavily Hispanic areas together with a strip of interstate 294, was unopposed in 2016, and took nearly 80% of the vote against his Republican opponent in 2014.

5th: contested elections with strong Democratic margins. Note that in 2016, there were no Republican candidates in the primary; presumably someone stepped up later on.

6th: heavily Republican but contested.

7th: even heavier Democrat margins than the 2nd district.

8th: safely Democrat but contested.

9th: heavily Democrat (66%) but contested.

10th: a true battleground district which flipped from GOP to Dem in 2016 (due in no small part to massive advertising)

11th: safely but moderately Democrat, contested.

12th: safely but moderately Republican, contested.

13th: safely but moderately Republican, contested.

14th: safely but moderately Republican, contested.

15th: heavily Republican, uncontested in 2016, and 75% of vote in 2014.

16th: heavily Republican, uncontested in 2016, and 70% of vote in 2014.

17th: safely but moderately Democrat, contested.

18th: safely Republican but contested.

Now, I’m not going to go into a discussion of the gerrymandering involved in these districts, but instead observe that two were uncontested with Republican incumbents, and two with Democratic incumbents, but others, despite their massive margins one way or another, still had candidates willing to put forth the effort. Were these lost-cause candidates fringe, candidates, perhaps not quite grounded in reality? Did they hope, in whatever way, to make a contribution? Were they “real” candidates with connections to their claimed political parties? Did they just want to see their name on the ballot? I don’t know.

But the conventional wisdom is apparently that it is political suicide to run for office in a no-hope district, as much as you’d think it would be the opposite, a way of paying your dues, by demonstrating to your party that you’re willing to step up, as a non-crackpot, to represent the Republican party in a Democratic district, or vice-versa.

And at the same time, here’s something I honestly don’t know: is a state party apparatus allowed to recruit candidates for a given district, or must it depend on individuals to declare their candidacy on their own? After all, the whole point of the primary election is to end backroom deals for party nominees, isn’t it? I mean, sure, unofficially, the party bosses do this all the time, but can one say of this instance, “the Republican party had the obligation to field a candidate to insure that it didn’t end up with a Nazi on the ballot claiming to be a Republican”, or is this just the bad luck of no one stepping forward, maybe even thinking they were “safe” while Jones quietly collected his signatures and turned in his petitions at the last minute?

UPDATE: the Tribune this morning confirms that Jones indeed did submit his petitions on the day of the deadline, Dec. 4th, 2017 — which means that journalists were asleep at the wheel, for this to go unreported until yesterday.

The Tribune also blames gerrymandering:

Lay part of the blame on gerrymandering, which creates districts that overwhelmingly favor one party.

But gerrymandering isn’t really a culprit here — after all, the gerrymandering process made this district less Democratic, not more, taking what would have been a “natural” district that would have been virtually all Democratic, and, as I wrote above, adding into it a fair bit of suburban voters to render their Republican votes useless. That this is a safe Democratic district is due simply to the concentration of Democrats in large cities; lay the blame, if you wish, on the socioeconomic segregation of cities. But consider, too, whether political parties should be empowered to reject candidates from filing as representing that party — if not in all cases, then by some sort of appeals process that says, “this dude goes against all the values expressed our platform.” And, beyond that, it would also fall into the category of “a good thing to do” for political parties to reward those who run in lost-cause districts, rather than, as conventional wisdom has it, punish them.

Image: from Pixabay (public domain), https://pixabay.com/en/republicans-elephant-political-party-303843/

Previous Post

February 5, 2018

The "Fantasy of Replacement"

Next Post

February 6, 2018 How far should sports-access for the disabled go?

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Actuarial/Retirement Issues Politics Uncategorized

Select a Month September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 December 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 August 2021 June 2021 April 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What famous prayer did Jesus teach his followers?

Select your answer to see how you score.

The Lord's Prayer The Prayer of Jabez The Jesus Prayer The Hail Mary