From the twitter feed, #3, the Obama portraits

Last updated on: February 13, 2018 at 12:23 pm by Jane the Actuary

From the twitter feed, #3, the Obama portraits 2018-02-13T10:50:06-06:00 Jane the Actuary

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

CNN reported on the Obama portrait unveiling yesterday, but it’s not yet available in the public domain so the image above is from the Bush portrait unveiling.

Instead, I can only offer that you look at the link above and promise that I’ll update the placeholder images below when available.

My reaction to President Obama’s picture: it’s OK, I guess. I know that it’s the style of the artist, Kehinde Wiley, to depict “African-Americans posed in the style of Old Master paintings, regal, formal and filled with pops of color,” as CNN phrases it, and this is in that style, so it’s not a surprise. The portrait does look like Obama, and, really, the only odd thing about it, to my eye, aside from the question of what you think of the style, is that Obama and the chair he’s sitting in appear to be superimposed on top of the background, rather than it looking natural. And, again, it’s a part of the artist’s style, but in other images one can find online, it looks more deliberately so, where here it looks a bit more like it was supposed to be integrated in more naturally but it didn’t work out.

As to Michelle Obama’s picture, well, here’s CNN’s description:

Michelle Obama chose Baltimore-based artist Amy Sherald. Sherald is another African-American artist known for her unique style, and her portraits also tend to underscore themes of social justice. She often paints black skin tones in gray as a way to take away the assigned “color” of her subjects. Sherald’s work is less about realism in composition and more about shape and color; like Wiley, the choice of Sherald ushers in a new era of presidential portrait.

And it does look interesting, though the grey skin, however much it has a political message behind it, is visually unappealing, and the schoolchildren who Michelle said she hopes are inspired, aren’t going to understand its purpose. What’s more unsettling, though, is that the image just doesn’t look like Michelle Obama, but like a generic idealized American black woman. Maybe it’s just me (I stink at faces and totally identify with people who say they have “face blindness” though I’m sure that I wouldn’t meet the clinical definition) but it just feels “off” — and I don’t mean this in the way that people meanspiritedly criticize her for scowling. It reminds me of the time I took an art class in the evenings and we worked on making portraits from photographs using grids, and I came up with something that looked reasonably like a real person — just not the person it was supposed to be.

I’ll be the first to admit that I don’t have an eye for this sort of thing, and I am not going to criticize the Obamas for choosing artists who would render the portraits in a more “artsy” style rather than a conventional portrait. And if you look at Clinton’s portrait online it’s clear that not all presidents have chosen traditional portraits. And perhaps there’s an intent here, that the Obamas wanted to highlight artistic styles and artists rather than themselves, specifically.

So, as usual, readers, what do you think?

Image: President Barack Obama and First Lady Michelle Obama host a ceremony on the occasion of the unveiling of the official portraits of former President George W. Bush and former First Lady Laura Bush, in the East Room of the White House, May 31, 2012. (Official White House Photo by Lawrence Jackson); https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/blog/2012/05/31/president-obama-unveils-official-portrait-president-george-w-bush

Uncategorized

art

National Portrait Gallery

Obama

Previous Post

February 13, 2018

From the twitter feed, #2, "legal Dreamers"

Next Post

February 19, 2018 Update from Denmark: the [gender pay gap] you will always have with you.

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Actuarial/Retirement Issues Politics Uncategorized

Select a Month September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 December 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 August 2021 June 2021 April 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who was the Roman emperor when Jesus was born?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Tiberius Julius Caesar Nero Augustus