Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Catholic
Politics and Religion
Will you visit the Obama museum?

Will you visit the Obama museum?

Last updated on: January 11, 2018 at 9:43 am by Jane the Actuary

Will you visit the Obama museum? 2018-01-11T09:43:34-06:00 Jane the Actuary

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

In the paper today, “Revised Obama center design seeks better fit with park and answer to critics.”

Addressing criticism that their plans would undermine the serene landscape of historic Jackson Park, backers of the Obama Presidential Center on Tuesday revealed major revisions that include a sleeker version of the center’s controversial museum tower.

The new tower design calls for a high-rise that would be taller, thinner and more transparent than a version unveiled last May, which was widely panned as monolithic and pyramidlike. Portions of the revamped tower’s outside walls would consist of screens made of stone letters, making the tower airier while suggesting the importance of words in Barack Obama’s presidency.

Which motivated me to go back to the website and re-read the descriptions of the museum. Regular readers will know that I’ve been skeptical of the whole project, including Obama boosters’ dreams that the museum and Obama himself will revitalize the South Side of Chicago, the Madigan proposal to spend $100 million on its construction, and the vagueness about the content of the museum.

And I’m still not seeing anything that really encourages me about the “Center.”

It isn’t a presidential library, in the sense of storing Obama’s records. That’s going to continue to be done by the National Archives and Records Administration, at some federal facility, with only digitized versions of those records available at the Center.

It will, in part, be a museum, with exhibit space in the “tower” portion of the campus that, according to obama.org,

will house exhibitions that tell the Obamas’ story, as situated within the context of history: civil rights history, African-American history, the history of Chicago, and United States history.

This is where I ask myself, how will this museum fit in with the existing museum-space of Chicago? We already have a Chicago History Museum, admission $16 (increasing to $19 after a just-approved fee hike). We have the DuSable Museum of African American History, admission $10. Will the Obama Center be competing with these museums? How much floor space will be devoted to the traditional museum exhibits, and how will this be balanced between the “Obama’s story” — and how will they make “boy growing up mostly with wealthy grandparents and attending pricey universities” into an inspirational tale? How will they transform 8 years in the White House into something edifying and attention-grabbing? The Obama website offers some clues in the tiles in its “Our Story” section: Chicago: Where It Began, Life at the White House, American Leadership, Economic Progress, Health Care, Equality & Social Progress, Climate & Energy, and Our First Tech President. But how do you fashion these into compelling exhibit areas, without falling in to the too-common trap now of simply placing a bunch of monitors with video displays and calling it “interactive”?

And bear in mind that their projected annual attendance, 625,000 – 700,000, is about the level of the Adler Planetarium, and substantially higher than presidential museums have a track record of; the highest-attendance museum is the George W. Bush museum, at about 450,000 presumably because it’s pretty new; other high-attendance museums are the Reagan museum, at about 400,000 (remember, they have Air Force One), and the Clinton museum, at 350,000. To be sure, Chicago has a larger population to draw from, but, at the same time, we have more museums competing for attention. In the end, presidential museums seem to keep visitor numbers up by sponsoring special exhibits with a limited connection to the overall topic of the museum and by bringing in school classes on field trips, which tend to be free of charge.

Beyond this optimistic attendance assumption, the notion that this museum will lead to the revival of the South Side seems like mostly wishful thinking — except, of course, to the extent that the occasion of the museum construction or the general city infrastructure spending or the pressure applied to corporations leads them to initiate building projects in the area. Tourists may perhaps add a day onto their trip, but they’re not likely to stay overnight in the vicinity of the museum, but just at the same hotel they’ve been staying at — and, quite honestly, given the rates and the taxes for city hotels, I wonder how many tourists stay in the city in the first place.

But that’s just the museum/exhibit space proper. And the plans for the Center are much more ambitious than that: part of the tower will be the museum.

The rest of the building will be filled with other public spaces, including the top floor which will feature a reflective observation space that will be free and open to the public, with spectacular views of Lake Michigan and Jackson Park.

There will also be a second building, two story, called the Forum.

The Forum is two-story public meeting space, with one story above grade and one below ground, where people of all backgrounds can come together for programming. Visitors might take in a performance in the auditorium, create something in the broadcast studio, visit the public winter garden, or even grab a bite to eat in the restaurant. Like much of the Campus, the majority of this space will be free and open to the public.

According to a Tribune column, this building is also slated to have a “test kitchen.”

There will also be what’s being called a “library building” even though there won’t be any document repository.

The Library Building is the third main building of the campus — a portal for visitors to engage with the world beyond the Obama Presidential Center. More than a building housing documents from the past, we want this to be a place for visitors to play a real role in building our collective future. With that in mind, to tap into the existing learning network within the city, the Foundation is currently exploring the possibility of a partnership with the Chicago Public Library.

Which makes it sound as if they don’t really know what they’ll do with this building. After all, there are multiple library branches in that part of town, including one just a bit south.

Oh, and there will be an Athletic Center.

The Athletic Center will invite the community to take part in physical activity year round, highlighting the importance of teamwork and exercise through sports. It will provide opportunities for programming partnerships with local institutions, including Hyde Park Academy, the South Side YMCA, and the Chicago Park District Field House.

So all of these activities sound more like a souped-up community center than anything else, and a souped-up community center isn’t going to draw tourists, however nice it might be for the community — and even then, there’s already a community center, the South Shore Cultural Center, just south of there (I don’t know why it’s not mentioned in the above paragraph, unless that’s what the Chicago Park District Field House is). And given that community centers are not just something of which, “the more, the merrier,” whatever sort of yoga classes the Obama Center offers would be competing for students with other such programs.

And on top of this, there have been ongoing reports (sorry, no links) about the Center as a site for conferences and as a home base for the Foundation’s work in community development. But there’s nothing in the description that suggests that there will be a substantial amount of office space.

So I guess what it comes down to is that it seems like it has a very high chance of ultimately being a bust, and a tremendous waste of money and effort, relative to the amount of private and public money that’s being spent on it. And, as an incidental snarky comment, should all of the wishes of community leaders come true, then it won’t take long before they start complaining that rising property values are pricing people out of the neighborhood.

Image: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File%3AMichelle_and_Barack_Obama.jpg; By Pete Souza (White House (021913PS-0395)) [Public domain], via Wikimedia Commons

Uncategorized

Obama

Obama library

Previous Post

January 9, 2018

Some questions for agers-in-place -- and movers, too

Next Post

January 11, 2018 Sh**hole hypocrisy

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Actuarial/Retirement Issues Politics Uncategorized

Select a Month September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 December 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 August 2021 June 2021 April 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

I include truth, righteousness, the gospel, faith, salvation, and the Spirit. What am I?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Spiritual weapons The armor of God The shield of faith The breastplate of righteousness