Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Catholic
Politics and Religion
What about the “iGen”?

What about the “iGen”?

Last updated on: December 6, 2017 at 9:20 am by Jane the Actuary

What about the “iGen”? 2017-12-06T09:20:32-06:00 Jane the Actuary

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

pokemon-1553995_960_720

So after spending enough time working through iGen yesterday that I felt like I was writing a book report for homework, I’m trying to take a step back and look at her observations in a big-picture sort of way, because if her generalizations are true, we’re looking at a substantial cultural shift.

And, about these changes, I’m asking myself:

Which of these are just continuations of ongoing trends, vs. something truly new?

Which are blips based on short-term news-cycle developments?

Which are general societal changes impacting the culture as a whole, not just the young ‘uns?

Of these, which are having particular impacts on this generation because they’re coming of age (whether childhood/teens/young adulthood) during a period of transition?

And which are Twenge seeing what she wants to see?

I was hoping to check Gen Z @ Work from the library, even though I found it fairly weak and lacking in data, to see if its conclusions lined up, but, as it turned out, it had been removed from the shelves, apparently because it was lost or damaged. So I guess it’s just Twenge for now.

Here are some generalizations:

Teens and young adults are less eager to “grow up”; they don’t chafe at but welcome their parents’ close supervision, and want care and safety in college. Why? Twenge suggests that, besides the “natural” desire to be lazy if they can get away with it, they have had pleasant childhoods from which they don’t wish to escape.

Teens spend massive amounts of time on social media and on the internet and/or playing video games in general, and less time working, reading, doing schoolwork, or socializing with friends in-person. This is to the detriment of their mental health, as they’re less likely to report being happy than Millennials were. Are all of these changes due solely to the availability of social media? Is the desperate desire for “likes” a permanent feature of the teen and young adult years? At what age are they no longer susceptible to this? Besides this, around here at least, youth sports are tremendous time-sucks for the pre-high school crowd; how does this factor in? Certainly by the teen years these kids either move into high school or club sports or drop these activities entirely — what effect has the presence of a very scheduled pre-teen childhood had?

All that lack of reading is making them dumb, and we’ll have to compensate by making textbooks easier to read. But the reason for textbooks being difficult to read is not for textbook authors to show off their smarts, but to impart complex information.

Teens are abandoning religion. To a considerable extent, this seems to be the result of their baby boomer parents, while not showing up as religion-rejecters themselves, choosing not to share that religion with their children. Is this actively a decision that these teens and young adults are making, or is this a decision their parents made for them? Yes, anecdotally there are teens who declare that they discovered on their own that they don’t believe in God, but it seems far more likely that parents who have a very weak attachment to Christianity yet still possess that identity, don’t pass it on to their kids. Whichever case it is, though, it’s a huge unknown what impact this’ll have, particularly with the U.S. being so divided and community bonds being fractured in so many other ways. Plus, Twenge connects up decline in religious belief with the rise in individualism, but she doesn’t explain why there should be a religion-decreasing rise in individualism.

Teens and young adults want safety. Their parents told them they need to be safe and they ate it up: they buckle their seatbelts, demand safe spaces in college, want “safe” jobs rather than the risk-taking of entrepreneurship.

Teens have a more fatalistic, “you can’t control your fate” view of the world. The college protest movements might ostensibly be about changing things for the better, but underlying them is an attitude that things are really horrible and minority students and women can’t possibly get ahead in the present circumstances.

Looking at this constellation of traits, it seems as if a fundamental element of American culture is disappearing. It is characteristic of Europeans to be very secular, to demand protection (e.g., the narrow list of reasons for which one can be fired, the generous government benefits), to believe that the “social partners” (e.g., government and labor unions), but not oneself individually, can make life better — not to mention the calls for free college.

In line with their delayed adulthood, young adults are marrying later and later, and, despite the increase in unwed parenting, they are on average having fewer children and at older ages. “Hookup culture” and the rise of porn are changing attitudes toward sex, from the now-outdated “how many dates should you go on before you have sex?” to the new “how many times do you have sex before you go out on a date?” If you recall, Lisa Wade in American Hookup reported that at the beginning of the “hookup era” graduates would settle into more-normal dating patterns after graduation, but that more recently, in her observation, even after leaving college, young people don’t know how to “date.” What happens next? Twenge’s observations about the lack of social skills among teens and young adults accustomed to interacting virtually, would suggest that as this generation approaches the age where their somewhat older brothers and sisters would be marrying, at the now-normal age of 30, we’ll be learning that there’s more going on with this generation than just delayed adulthood.

Her observation that teens and young adults are far more willing to sign off on LGBTism (or at least LGB-ism) than prior generations, and to experiment themselves, may not mean anything much, or it may be quite important indeed, not as something to be celebrated but as an indiator of their loss of partnered relationships.

Twenge notes that young people are less likely to have party affiliation, more likely to support libertarian causes and more likely to follow the news. But at the same time there’s all this campus activism — how does that square? Is the lack of party affiliation a result of lack of community identification in general (other than with one’s “identity group” based on personal characteristics)? Is it simply due to the general screw-up-ness of the Democrats and the GOP at the moment, which has affected young people to a greater degree because they don’t have a past history of identification?

And what does this all add up to? To at least some degree, it appears to be a matter of ability, or lack thereof, to think at an abstract level. After all, the libertarian streak that Twenge identifies all relates to items the wrongness of which is not immediately clear and visceral. Accepting “unsafe” situations, as they’ve defined it, also has a certain component of abstract thinking, to be able to understand that a campus speaker they dislike, for instance, or an alternate point of view in a classroom can be something to learn from. The ability to think into the future, to form relationships depends on this. Religion, of course, is abstract — and here it seems like there’s a chicken-and-egg issue: are young people rejecting religion because it’s too abstract for them, or have they not been raised to understand religion, and therefore don’t have the tools for processing other intangible ideas? Is this level of abstract thinking really something that no 20-year-old processes, but in the past they weren’t expected to because the norms of society pulled them along?

And — in addition to all of the other ways that the internet and social media and the “easyness” of electronic gaming is impacting the lives of children and young adults — perhaps here, too, the existence of this infinite information resource that promises “all answers are concrete and just a click away” impacts one’s mindset, especially if that’s a part of one’s growing up.

Finally, you’ll note that although I have three boys who are smack-dab in this age group, I haven’t mentioned them once to confirm or object to Twenge’s observations. Quite honestly, my boys fit some of these stereotypes, but not others, because of their personalities, and because of issues of their own. No, they’re not Special Snowflakes, but I won’t discuss further details in recognition of their privacy.

Image: From Pixabay; https://pixabay.com/en/pokemon-pokemon-go-phone-game-1553995/; public domain

Uncategorized

boys

generational differences

Previous Post

December 3, 2017

From the library: iGen, by Jean M. Twenge

Next Post

December 6, 2017 Let's name a Person of the Year

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Actuarial/Retirement Issues Politics Uncategorized

Select a Month September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 December 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 August 2021 June 2021 April 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who did Joseph eventually forgive and provide for in Egypt?

Select your answer to see how you score.

His captors Potiphar Pharaoh His brothers