Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Catholic
Politics and Religion
Is there a secularism tipping point?

Is there a secularism tipping point?

Last updated on: December 13, 2017 at 10:41 am by Jane the Actuary

Is there a secularism tipping point? 2017-12-13T10:41:51-06:00 Jane the Actuary

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Church of St. Luke and the Epiphany, Philadelphia (public domain via Wikipedia)

Because I finally found out how to access survey data on church attendance! This is the General Social Survey, run at the University of Chicago, funded by the National Science Foundation, with data going back to 1972. It tracks such questions as “do you believe in God?” or “what is your religious preference?”

And it asks about church attendance.

Now, I’ve seen statistics about church attendance before, largely in the form of a Gallup poll that asks, have you attended church in the last seven days. And there’s always the complaint that people who think of themselves as usually going to church, but didn’t go the Sunday prior to the pollster’s call, lie and say they did, so that the “yes” replies are overstated. But the General Social Survey isn’t black-and-white, but offers a fine gradation of responses:

more than once a week
every week
nearly every week
2 or 3 times a month
every month
a couple times a year
once a year
less than once a year
never,

along with splits by region, age, education, and so on,

and I thought, “awesome! I can finally see if my hunch is right, that the drop-off in religious practice has been that people that, some decades ago, would have considered them Christian, even if they barely go to church and aren’t sure they believe anything other than Jesus Was a Nice Guy and All Dogs Go To Heaven, now have decided that they don’t need to bother with it.”

And I looked at the charts. And I exported the data, and I sliced and I diced, and — well, I didn’t find that perfect insight that’s going to amaze everyone who reads it.

But I’ll share with you what I learned anyway.

Let’s start with some basic tables. It seems to me that the most useful measure of regular religious practice is the percent of respondents who replied that they attend some sort of service on a monthly basis. Yes, within that group, there’s a difference between those who attend weekly and those who don’t, and, for families anyway, there are increasing number of activities conflicting with weekly attendance — sporting events, extracurricular activities, etc. It’s challenging enough for Catholics who typically have Saturday evening masses available, or even Sunday nights, but for a Protestant who has one worship service or maybe two to choose from? Good luck with that one! But monthly attendance seems to be a basic marker of frequent enough attendance to have some connectedness with one’s church, so I put together some charts on this basis.

Here’s monthly attendance by age.

church by age

Not surprisingly, the 18 – 34s are the least likely to attend, and there’s been a definite drop, although there’s also been some bouncing around, higher in the 80s, then a drop and an early 00s recovery, and now a steeper drop. In fact, there’s a lot of bouncing around, which would seem to suggest that these are small sample sizes, though I couldn’t find details on that. And, by the way, these are simple excel charts, and I really stink at formatting them nicely, but the advantage for you is that I don’t play around with them and the Y axis starts at 0.

Slicing and dicing differently, I took three-period averages because I didn’t like the data, then looked at the relative changes over time.

age table

So what’s interesting here is that, for all that young adults attend church less frequently than their elders, the relative drop-off since 1974 (which is, again, averaged), is pretty nearly the same for all ages except the 65+ group, but the patterns are different, as the 18 – 34s stayed steady in the earlier part of this period, then “caught up” afterwards.

Here’s another chart, monthly attendance by region.

region chart

So, yes, the Northeast and the West have always been the least church-attending regions. At present, here’s a split by region of overall patterns:

region table

Some other data points:

Women attend church at consistently higher rates than men; in 2016, these rates were 48.8% of women attending monthly vs. 39.4% of men. That ratio has stayed fairly constant over the time period since 1974. What has changed is that in the past, women were even more likely than men to attend on a weekly or near-weekly basis, as much as 50% more often than men, in the 1980s, and women’s attendance has dropped more than men’s. From 1985 to 2016, women’s weekly attendance dropped by 28% to 27.5% of women, and men’s weekly attendance dropped by 14% to 22.3% of men.

The relatively more educated (some college or more) and the relatively less educated (drop-outs) attend more often than those in the middle, with only a high school diploma, with monthly attendance rates of 46.9%, 41.8%, and 48.3%, respectively, again, on my smoothed basis.

Those who describe themselves as middle class are more likely to attend than those who consider themselves as working class — 47.1% vs. 42.8% based on the smoothed monthly rates. (They also have classifications of “lower class” and “upper class” but these rates bounce around a great deal and I don’t trust the data, since it’s a matter of self-identification, and I imagine that these two groups are very small and the portion of the population willing to identify themselves as such changes over time.)

And here are two more data items from other sources:

First, a Gallup poll on church attendance, showing that the 50s were an unusually religious time period, and the 40s weren’t, despite the image of everyone praying on D-Day. Again, this poll likely includes semi-regular attenders, but it still captures general trends, though it could artificially sink at some point if the semi-regulars no longer see a need to feel better about themselves or look better to the pollster.

Gallup

See also an article about postwar religion in America, “Why 1940s America wasn’t as religious as you think — the rise and fall of American religion,” which reports that the 50s were a boom period for religion, sometimes called the “Third Great Awakening.”

And, in today’s twitter feed, a report from Pew on Christmas practices, which reports that only 51% of Americans plan to attend services on Christmas or Christmas Eve. This is a surprisingly small number to me, given that 75% of Americans report that they attend religious services to at least some degree (that is, not “never”). To be sure, “religious services” can take the form of the temple or mosque, but the percent of Jews, Muslims, and “other” don’t account for this gap; according to the GSS, it’s 6%. Which must mean that a fair number of the sporadic churchgoers are counting Great-Aunt Mary’s funeral, or their niece’s baptism, but aren’t observing the traditional “Christmas and Easter.”

So what’s next? To begin with, should we reasonably expect church attendance patterns to stay the same when society itself has changed?

Society in 2017 is not a replica of the society of 1974. And by that I don’t mean that there have been social changes in the meantime, but simply that demographically the people of America in 2017 are not simply the next generation taking the place of their elders. 14% of the population is foreign-born; a further 12% are the children of immigrants. Of the native-born population, Mormons, black Protestants, Evangelical Protestants, and Catholics have the highest family size; mainline Protestants, atheists and agnostics have the smallest families. (This is based on “completed fertility,” that is, by polling women ages 40 – 59, past their prime childbearing years, so it won’t capture trends in recent years.) This latter difference would suggest that church attendance should rise over time; that it’s not is because a fair portion of those raised with a faith, leave that faith — and, beside that, I couldn’t fine any statistics on fertility correlated with degree of religiosity vs. simple religious identification.

So we can’t simply expect that levels of religious practice, or particular religions being practiced, will stay constant by being passed on from parents to children. What matters instead is what’s going on in society as a whole, to the extent that there is such a thing as “society as a whole.”

Which means that I’m asking myself, is there a tipping point?

The infrequent attenders are, if you will, a swing group. If the overall culture is a “Christian” culture in which religion is the norm, they’ll see themselves as part of that group. If irreligiosity becomes the new norm, one would expect that they’ll swing in that direction. And American culture has unmistakably shifted. The “civic religion” that was once a loose version of Christianity, has now taken the form of celebration of “diversity” and “multiculturalism” which is, if not in conflict with a Christian culture, than certainly nothing that reinforces it. The whole Roy Moore spectacle certainly creates an image of Christianity in conflict with non-Christians. To the extent that “diversity” has now become acceptance and even celebration of same-sex relationships, and a rejection of anything that hints at “intolerance” (except, of course, that one may be as intolerant of traditional Christianity and Republicans as one likes), it pulls this group further away. It might be a trivial example, but it seems to me that not long ago, comics used church attendance as a set-up for a joke; now the “shared cultural activity” that takes place on Sunday morning is brunch.

And people’s perceptions of what the culture at large says, matter. Yes, Christians like to say they’re “countercultural,” but in reality it is no fun to be in the minority, and to feel that minority status, and a perception that church-goers are in the minority will serve to encourage on-the-fence adults to identify otherwise.

And none of this has to do with the claims that it is our society’s wealth and education that means that we don’t “need” religion as a source of comfort in times of hardship. After all, again, it is the more educated, better off, who are more likely to be churchgoing. And one reads plenty often that we in America are taking the same path to secularism as Europe did, just a bit later — but, even if the end result may be the same (and we don’t know that yet), their path doesn’t seem to have been our path. Their secularism is paired with, in most countries, an official or semi-official State or societal observance of Christianity. In Bavaria, schools have crucifixes, and children go to church at the beginning and end of the school year. They have, for the most part, not had our insistent culture of “diversity.” The reasons for their rejection of or disinterest in Christianity surely lie elsewhere, say, in the disillusionment of the World Wars, or the impact of the State church becoming watered-down, or the legacy of secularism politically — e.g., in France.

And, again, one would like to say that we’ll lose the “cultural Christians” and it’s no big deal because our core of churchgoers will stick around. But it seems likely that there’s a tipping point in which we lose those churchgoers, too.

Image: Church of St. Luke and the Epiphany, Philadelphia (public domain via Wikipedia)

Uncategorized

church attendance

Previous Post

December 8, 2017

Dream-hoarding? Maybe dream-rejecting. Or, Holy Moly, would you look at these marriage statistics?!

Next Post

December 13, 2017 What will life be like . . . in the year 2000?

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Actuarial/Retirement Issues Politics Uncategorized

Select a Month September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 December 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 August 2021 June 2021 April 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

In the Parable of the Sower, what does the seed represent?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Judgment The Law Money The Word of God