Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Catholic
Politics and Religion
Bruce Rauner, Scorpion

Bruce Rauner, Scorpion

Last updated on: September 29, 2017 at 10:59 am by Jane the Actuary

Bruce Rauner, Scorpion 2017-09-29T10:59:53-06:00 Jane the Actuary

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

DSC_0304c

That’s a folktale that shows up every now and again. It’s in the form of an Aesop fable, but not actually one.

The short version of the tale (full version here) is that a scorpion asks a frog to carry him across a river. The dialog then goes:

“Well now, Mr. Scorpion! How do I know that if I try to help you, you wont try to kill me?” asked the frog hesitantly.

“Because,” the scorpion replied, “If I try to kill you, then I would die too, for you see I cannot swim!”

And the scorpion thus persuades the frog to carry him. But halfway across, the scorpion stings the frog.

“You fool!” croaked the frog, “Now we shall both die! Why on earth did you do that?”

The scorpion shrugged, and did a little jig on the drownings frog’s back.

“I could not help myself. It is my nature.”

In other retellings of similar stories, it is a snake, who says, “You knew what I was when you found me.”

And I am reminded of this in reading the news about Governor Rauner’s decision to sign a Democrat-passed bill authorizing Medicaid to fund elective abortions as well as including them as covered services in health plans for state employees.

He did so despite campaigning that he would maintain the status quo on abortion and other social issues, and despite a promise, this past spring, to veto the bill. He did so despite having personally assured Cardinal Cupich of a veto. In response, Cupich said in a Tribune report, “He broke his word to the people.” The Catholic Conference of Illinois issued a statement that said, in part, “We are deeply disturbed that Governor Rauner has broken his word and firm public promise to veto HB 40. And State Senator Tim Bivins, Republican from Dixon, likewise said in a statement:

Several months ago he (Rauner) promised over 23 legislators he would veto the bill . . . . Today he said he has to stand by what he believes is the right thing to do. Today I will also stand on what I believe is the right thing to do. I will not support this governor for re-election.

So why did Rauner do what he did? He says it’s because it’s because of his deeply held beliefs, and I won’t quibble with him.

The bigger question is, why did he promise Republicans, Catholics, and others that he would veto the bill back in the spring?

Rauner claims

“I tried in the spring, and I’ve tried for months as this bill was debated and ultimately passed, to find common ground with both sides of this issue,” Rauner said. “We were unable to do that. The passions run too deep.”

But in Illinois, governors have the power to do what’s called an amendatory veto, in which he revises the law to his liking, and legislators can accept his changes or try to override them. Rauner declined to do so. And, really, I haven’t seen a single indicator of such a mythical “search for common ground.” Rauner wanted to fund abortions for women on Medicaid and state employees, and he has now done so.

What seems far more likely is that in the spring, Rauner needed all the support he could get in the budget fight with Democrats, which was finally resolved with a budget deal in July (in which Democrats found enough Republicans willing to support their tax hikes, to override Rauner’s veto of the budget bill), and the subsequent deal on education funding in August. With those two fights over with, Rauner no longer needed to worry about alienating the pro-life community.

I wonder if there was a certain further line of thinking, that Catholics now “owed him” for putting the private school scholarship tax credit program in place, and would be obliged to continue to support him because it helps the Church’s bottom line, regardless of this bill-signing.

Is this a further indicator that Rauner won’t run for re-election? Does he figure that Republicans have no realistic chance of replacing him in a primary, and that Democrats would be indistinguishable from him on social issues anyway? At least, though, with Democrats you know what you’re going to get, as opposed to believing in a scorpion making promises.

Image: own photo.

Uncategorized

abortion

Bruce Rauner

Previous Post

September 28, 2017

Don't waive the Jones Act!

Next Post

October 6, 2017 The Las Vegas Killer: Why?

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Actuarial/Retirement Issues Politics Uncategorized

Select a Month September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 December 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 August 2021 June 2021 April 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

My name is Amos, before God called me to prophesy against Israel what was my occupation?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Shepherd and farmer Priest in the temple Fisherman Spinner of cloth