BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian
Beliefs
- Buddhist
- Catholic
- Contemplative
- Evangelical
- General Christian
- Hindu
- Jewish
- Latter-day Saint
- More Voices
- Muslim
- New Visions
- Pagan
- Progressive Christian
Topics
- Religion News
- Food and Religion
- Sports and Religion
- Religious Art
- Religious Music and Entertainment
- Religious Events
- History and Religion
- Style and Religion
- Politics and Religion
- Women in Religion
- Recreation Outdoors and Religion
- Business Finance and Religion
- Careers Workplace and Religion
- Education and Religion
- Family Parenting and Religion
- Health Fitness and Religion
- Home and Religion
- Relationships and Religion
- Technology and Religion
- Travel and Religion
Columnists
- Buddhist Columnists
- Business Finance and Religion Columnists
- Careers Workplace and Religion Columnists
- Catholic Columnists
- Contemplative Columnists
- Education and Religion Columnists
- Evangelists Columnists
- Family Parenting and Religion Columnists
- General Christian Columnists
- Health Fitness and Religion Columnists
- Hindu Columnists
- History and Religion Columnists
- Home and Religion Columnists
- Jewish Columnists
- More Voices Columnists
- Latter Day Columnists
- Muslim Columnists
- New Visions Columnists
- Nonreligious Columnists
- Pagan Columnists
- Politics and Religion Columnists
- Progressive Columnists
- Recreation Outdoors and Religion Columnists
- Relationships and Religion Columnists
- Religion News Columnists
- Religious Art Columnists
- Religious Events Columnists
- Religious Music and Entertainment Columnists
- Sports and Religion Columnists
- Style and Religion Columnists
- Technology and Religion Columnists
- Travel and Religion Columnists
- Women in Religion Columnists
Resource Library
- 2026 Calendar
- Library of World Religions
- The 100 Most Holy Places on Earth
- Patheos Answers
- Podcasts
- Videos
- Faith Leaders Database
- Anglican Episcopalian
- Bahai
- Baptist
- Buddhism
- Christianity
- Confucianism
- Eastern Orthodoxy
- Hinduism
- Holiness and Pentecostal
- ISKCON
- Islam
- Judaism
- Lutheran
- Methodist
- The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints
- New Age
- Paganism
- Presbytarian and Reformed
- Protestantism
- Religion Behind the Scenes
- Roman Catholic
- Scientology
- Shia Islam
- Sikhism
- Sufism
- Sunni Islam
- Taoism
- Zen
- See all religions
Research Tools
Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support
Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support
- Trending:
- Forgiveness
- |
- Marriage
- |
- Consciousness
- |
- Death Penalty
- |
- Election
- |
- Halloween
- Home
- Catholic
- Politics and Religion
- The only winning move is not to play
The only winning move is not to play
Last updated on: August 16, 2017 at 12:44 pm by Jane the Actuary
The only winning move is not to play 2017-08-16T12:44:05-06:00 Jane the Actuary
Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

What does that quote from Wargames have to do with Trump, and his loony press conference, and its aftermath? Is there any point to it besides revealing my age?
In the movie, a supercomputer controls the American nuclear missile system, and a teen boy hacks into its system, thinking he’s playing a computer game but unknowningly triggering that computer believing that a real attack from the Soviet Union is occurring (or maybe that a political scenario has occurred which its wargaming programming tells it requires a nuclear attack, I forget which). In the climax, the computer, “Joshua,” “learns” that a nuclear war is unwinnable, and says, “A strange game. The only winning move is not to play. How about a nice game of chess?” — at which point, with seconds to spare, it releases its control over the missiles rather than launch them.
No, I’m not suggesting that we’re headed into nuclear war. But I’ve very uncomfortable with how the Charlottesville aftermath is playing out, as we’re headed toward a confrontation between Trump and, well, a long list of opponents, and further battles between the ragtag groups of rightwing extremists vs. the antifa, who seem to be growing in their confidence. Each side is emboldened, and it worries me. And, yes, what follows is somewhat rambling but here goes:
To back up: if you haven’t heard, Trump gave a press conference yesterday. It was not his finest moment. Among other things, as the Tribune reports, of the protesters, he said,
“You had many people in that group other than neo-Nazis and white nationalists, okay?” Trump said. “And the press has treated them absolutely unfairly.”
which he’s getting (rightly) criticized for. To whatever degree there may be supporters of the “keep the monuments” movement who truly believe that they are defending historical preservation, they weren’t the ones at that march, and any well-meaning but misinformed “good people” should have been scared off with the news reports of the prior night’s “Jews will not replace us” rally, so this is wishful thinking on Trump’s part, and demonstrates his willingness to give these people a desperate “benefit of the doubt” but did not hesitate to characterize Mexicans as primarily criminals.
So I don’t really know what’s going on in his head. Perhaps it’s simply a matter of saving face, having said, or strongly implied, that both sides bore the blame in equal measure on Saturday. Perhaps he is as evil as the worst-case interpretation of his actions says, that he thinks that having white nationalists supporting him is to his benefit. Perhaps he just doesn’t want to believe that “nice white kids” would be this bad.
But look at the headlines.
The Chicago Tribune: “Trump again blames ‘both sides’ for Charlottesville violence.”
CNN: “Trump is who we feared he was.”

This is a screen capture from last night, as shared by @EsotericCD, who captions it, “We feared he was ratings gold,” and reminds his readers that CNN’s actions did a great deal to elevate Trump in the primary campaign.
Now look at the right hand side. See that headline, “Far right planning 9 rallies this weekend”? Here’s the link.
And the report:
Major cities across the country are bracing for an unusual wave of far-right rallies in the coming days.
The largest scheduled rally is the “March on Google,” which will take place in nine major US cities Saturday. The aim is to protest the firing of Google employee James Damore over a controversial memo he wrote about the company’s diversity policies. Damore has said he doesn’t support the “alt-right,” and will “likely not” participate.
But what is the “March on Google”? On the organizers’ site, they say (as of August 14th)
- The March on Google condemns and disavows violence, hatred, and bigotry and all groups that espouse it such as White Nationalists, KKK, Antifa, and NeoNazis.
- We will not use messages that are designed to incite anger, hate, or violence.
- We will respect the law and the police and cooperate in all matters.
- Any violation of these tenets will not be tolerated.
Is this an “Alt-Right” event? The answer is no. This is an event for First Amendment supporters from across the country, from all backgrounds, ethnicity, and walks of life. We will not tolerate any incendiary actions, messages, remarks, or gestures that go against the respectful, “open basket” spirit of the event.
And, following on the CNN report, they posted the following this morning:
The Peaceful March on Google has been postponed due to credible Alt Left terrorist threats for the safety of our citizen participants.
Despite our clear and straightfoward statements denouncing bigotry and hatred, CNN and other mainstream media made malicious and false statements that our peaceful march was being organized by Nazi sympathizers.
Following the articles, credible threats from known Alt Left terrorist groups have been reported to and relevant authorities have been notified.
In one instance, an Alt Left threat was made to use an automobile to drive into our peaceful march.
We hope to hold our peaceful march in a few weeks’ time.
We look forward to the day when the human right of peaceful Free Speech is once again able to be practiced in America.
Now, as it turns out, one of the organizers, Jack Posobiec, is possibly part of the “Alt Right,” though I can’t quite sort out the claims as to where he falls on the spectrum. (I’d add a link but I couldn’t figure out which of the available links was a reasonably credible source.)
(After drafting, I came across Ann Althouse, today, reporting that Posobiec is reportedly a part of the “Alt-Lite”, linking to the New York Times, which differentiates between the groups because the “lite” group is not racist.)
But CNN’s article provided no evidence of any extremism in the march itself. They didn’t mention Posobiec’s involvement, or anyone else’s, or any specifics at all. They simply labeled this a “far-right” and “alt-right” event and strongly implied that it was no different than the Charlottesville rally.
What does it matter?
It probably bothers me more than it should because back in the day, CNN was very much my first source for breaking news. Ask me about 9/11 and I’ll tell you about dropping my then-toddler off at daycare, after the planes had crashed, then checking the site impatiently while trying to get work done. Due to slow connections and overwhelming traffic, updates were slow.
But it also feels like this is just going to make a bad situation worse. CNN is not going to, by the moral force of its reporting, cause Trump to resign, nor cause him to be expelled from office without having actually committed a crime. They are not going to “win” this battle. But just as they proclaim that Trump has emboldened the white nationalists (and are creating this fact themselves as well), CNN may be emboldening the leftists, convincing them that they are the “good guys” and their violence is justified.
And, at the same time, will the white nationalists draw any other lesson from this than, eh, maybe next time let’s cover our faces like the antifa? Every time pundits and politicians say, “Trump’s failure to denounce white nationalists forcefully enough is a hidden gesture of support,” do they not hear that, too?
I mean, really, how many more street fights do we need?
Top image from from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Donald_Trump
Previous Post

August 15, 2017
What about monuments?
Next Post

August 16, 2017 Attention Rally-goers: do you want to win?
Browse Our Archives
Select a Category Actuarial/Retirement Issues Politics Uncategorized
Select a Month September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 December 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 August 2021 June 2021 April 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013
Follow Us!
TAKE THE
Religious Wisdom Quiz
What food did Elijah eat in the wilderness?
Select your answer to see how you score.
Bread and meat Figs and wine Manna Fish and honey
Related posts from Jane the Actuary
Can we -- should we -- pray for...
When Anti-Nazi-ism Goes Too Far
Is Trump really causing premature births?
TRENDING AT PATHEOS Catholic
When Halloween Unmasks Married Hearts
Written by Dr. David K. Ewen from Eternal Truth Bible College Behind...
Aristotle. He’s been called the father of logic, the father of the...
Methodist Central Hall and Westminster Abbey
Situated on the same square is Methodist Central Hall and Westminster Abbey. ...
57th Dove Awards Honor Dolly Parton, Crown New...
On gospel music’s biggest night, the 57th annual GMA Dove Awards honored...
The First Eucharistic Controversy: Christ’s Real Presence
For Catholics, the Eucharist is the source and summit of the Christian...
What a Stop Sign Can Teach Us About...
How to Make a Decision When You Can't Hear God Main point:...
view all Catholic blogs
Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support
- About Us
- 2026 Calendar
- Videos
- Podcasts
- Library of World Religions
- Faith In Media Tracker
- Advertise With Us
- Write for Us
- Privacy Policy
- Terms of Service
- Do Not Sell My Data
- Contact Us
- Radiant Digital
- Manage Newsletter Subscriptions
- Unsubscribe From Notifications
- Sitemap
Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.
Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In











