BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian
Beliefs
- Buddhist
- Catholic
- Contemplative
- Evangelical
- General Christian
- Hindu
- Jewish
- Latter-day Saint
- More Voices
- Muslim
- New Visions
- Pagan
- Progressive Christian
Topics
- Religion News
- Food and Religion
- Sports and Religion
- Religious Art
- Religious Music and Entertainment
- Religious Events
- History and Religion
- Style and Religion
- Politics and Religion
- Women in Religion
- Recreation Outdoors and Religion
- Business Finance and Religion
- Careers Workplace and Religion
- Education and Religion
- Family Parenting and Religion
- Health Fitness and Religion
- Home and Religion
- Relationships and Religion
- Technology and Religion
- Travel and Religion
Columnists
- Buddhist Columnists
- Business Finance and Religion Columnists
- Careers Workplace and Religion Columnists
- Catholic Columnists
- Contemplative Columnists
- Education and Religion Columnists
- Evangelists Columnists
- Family Parenting and Religion Columnists
- General Christian Columnists
- Health Fitness and Religion Columnists
- Hindu Columnists
- History and Religion Columnists
- Home and Religion Columnists
- Jewish Columnists
- More Voices Columnists
- Latter Day Columnists
- Muslim Columnists
- New Visions Columnists
- Nonreligious Columnists
- Pagan Columnists
- Politics and Religion Columnists
- Progressive Columnists
- Recreation Outdoors and Religion Columnists
- Relationships and Religion Columnists
- Religion News Columnists
- Religious Art Columnists
- Religious Events Columnists
- Religious Music and Entertainment Columnists
- Sports and Religion Columnists
- Style and Religion Columnists
- Technology and Religion Columnists
- Travel and Religion Columnists
- Women in Religion Columnists
Resource Library
- 2026 Calendar
- Library of World Religions
- The 100 Most Holy Places on Earth
- Patheos Answers
- Podcasts
- Videos
- Faith Leaders Database
- Anglican Episcopalian
- Bahai
- Baptist
- Buddhism
- Christianity
- Confucianism
- Eastern Orthodoxy
- Hinduism
- Holiness and Pentecostal
- ISKCON
- Islam
- Judaism
- Lutheran
- Methodist
- The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints
- New Age
- Paganism
- Presbytarian and Reformed
- Protestantism
- Religion Behind the Scenes
- Roman Catholic
- Scientology
- Shia Islam
- Sikhism
- Sufism
- Sunni Islam
- Taoism
- Zen
- See all religions
Research Tools
Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support
Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support
- Trending:
- Forgiveness
- |
- Marriage
- |
- Consciousness
- |
- Death Penalty
- |
- Election
- |
- Halloween
- Home
- Catholic
- Politics and Religion
- Oh, fun – Medicaid for all!
Oh, fun – Medicaid for all!
Last updated on: June 7, 2017 at 7:51 pm by Jane the Actuary
Oh, fun – Medicaid for all! 2017-06-07T19:51:19-06:00 Jane the Actuary
Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.
![https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File%3ADoctor_examines_patient_(1).jpg; By Unknown photographer [Public domain], via Wikimedia Commons](https://wp-media.patheos.com/blogs/sites/533/2016/08/800px-Doctor_examines_patient_1.jpg)
That’s what’s on tap in Nevada, though there are few details available at the moment. Vox reports that
The Nevada legislature passed a bill Friday that would allow anyone to buy into Medicaid, the public program that covers low-income Americans. It would be the first state to open the government-run program to all residents, regardless of their income or health status.
The bill is currently sitting with Nevada Gov. Brian Sandoval, a Republican. His office did not respond to an inquiry about whether he would sign the bill or veto it. . . .
Sprinkle (who told me his last name has led to some people calling the plan SprinkleCare) says they haven’t yet estimated how much enrolling in the Nevada Care Plan would cost individuals. The bill sponsors also have not determined whether buy-in Medicaid members would have a deductible or traditional copayments, which Medicaid typically does not have because of the low-income population it serves. . . .
On average, Medicaid pays 66 percent of what Medicare pays doctors.
In Nevada, Medicaid pays 81 percent of Medicare rates.
This has the advantage of keeping Medicaid a relatively low-cost program per person — but also the disadvantage of some doctors deciding not to accept Medicaid’s lower rates. A recent federal survey estimates that 68.9 percent of doctors are accepting new Medicaid patients, compared to 84.7 percent accepting new patients with private insurance.
The lack of detail means there’s not much to say about this bill — though I am surprised that there isn’t any sort of legislative analysis, in the way that there was for the California single-payer proposal. But here’s what I’ve been able to find out:
First of all, Medicaid is actually pretty danged cheap in Nevada – at least as of 2011, which seems to be the most recent available data. According to Kaiser, the state spent $2,367 per adult and $1,940 per child,that is, if you exclude the disabled and the elderly. That’s remarkably cheap, though I couldn’t find an apples-to-apples comparison for privately-insured (employer-provided) adults, except that Milliman calculated a per-family-of-four cost of $26,000 in 2016, which compares to $8,614 for Nevada Medicaid.
So Vox reports that Medicaid pays 81% of Medicare rates in Nevada, and commercial insurance rates, if I’m not mistaken, are 5 – 10% higher than Medicare (that comes from a vaguely-remembered offhand comment from my brother, who works in healthcare). That’s a far cry from this differential of 3 times!
How does Medicaid provide their coverage for so much less? Probably a couple reasons:
These figures are apples and oranges — the equivalent 2011 figure in the Milliman study was $19,000. There are also likely at least some disabled people in Milliman’s figure, whether it’s dependents of employees or the small number of disabled who are employed and receive employer-provided health insurance.
The overall healthcare costs in Nevada could well simply be less, as a lower-cost state.
Potentially the reported per-beneficiary costs exclude the state’s costs to run the program, and only looks at the money paid out to providers.
And I suspect that Medicaid beneficiaries are lower-cost than average, if you strip the disabled out. After all, even under the expanded 133% of poverty eligibility, you’re more likely to qualify if you have children, rather than being an empty-nester, because the income cut-off increases with more people in the household; plus, you are simply more likely to have above-poverty income as you get older, don’t you think? And since healthcare expenses are higher for the 50-somethings, this should have an impact. Plus, for all the reports of Medicaid recipients going to the ER for pregnancy tests, I wouldn’t be surprised if in other respects their costs were lower, because they’re less likely to be doing the research involved in seeking out high-cost cancer treatments, or knee replacements, or the like.
But is the lower cost of Medicaid “proof” that single-payer is more cost-efficient?
Interestingly, the answer is “no” – but not for the reason you’d expect.
What the Vox article misses is that Nevada’s standard Medicaid benefit is not single payer. According to (undated) documentation from the state,
All Medicaid recipients who live in urban Washoe County (Reno) or Clark County (greater Las Vegas area) who are not determined disabled by the Social Security Administration are mandated,
that is, must receive their Medicaid benefits through one of two managed care organizations. Health Plan of Nevada is a subsidiary of United Healthcare, and Amerigroup’s parent company is Anthem.
So having spent more time digging into this than I probably should have, I’m now just more irritated at the lack of information. What makes these plans more attractive for potential buy-in recipients than the usual “marketplace” plans? What drives the lower costs? Is the “social compact” acceptance of lower rates by providers at risk if the state widens eligibility too much, and opens up the plans to “free riders” of a sort? Or would the rates for buy-in, if actuarially- rather than politically-determined, be significantly higher than the state’s current Medicaid spending?
Inquiring minds want to know.
Image: yes, I keep using the same generic “doctor examining a patient” pic. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File%3ADoctor_examines_patient_(1).jpg; By Unknown photographer [Public domain], via Wikimedia Commons
Previous Post

June 6, 2017
More virtual candles
Next Post

June 8, 2017 Comey hearing open thread
Browse Our Archives
Select a Category Actuarial/Retirement Issues Politics Uncategorized
Select a Month September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 December 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 August 2021 June 2021 April 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013
Follow Us!
TAKE THE
Religious Wisdom Quiz
What does James say we should be quick to do and slow to do?
Select your answer to see how you score.
Quick to pray, slow to doubt Quick to forgive, slow to judge Quick to obey, slow to question Quick to listen, slow to speak and slow to become angry
Related posts from Jane the Actuary
Amazonian Healthcare? Good luck . . .
The Cost-Sharing Reduction Payment elimination - right, and...
The CBO and Obamacare replacements: using the wrong...
Fact-checking California's Single Payer proposal
TRENDING AT PATHEOS Catholic
When Halloween Unmasks Married Hearts
Written by Dr. David K. Ewen from Eternal Truth Bible College Behind...
Aristotle. He’s been called the father of logic, the father of the...
Methodist Central Hall and Westminster Abbey
Situated on the same square is Methodist Central Hall and Westminster Abbey. ...
57th Dove Awards Honor Dolly Parton, Crown New...
On gospel music’s biggest night, the 57th annual GMA Dove Awards honored...
The First Eucharistic Controversy: Christ’s Real Presence
For Catholics, the Eucharist is the source and summit of the Christian...
What a Stop Sign Can Teach Us About...
How to Make a Decision When You Can't Hear God Main point:...
view all Catholic blogs
Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support
- About Us
- 2026 Calendar
- Videos
- Podcasts
- Library of World Religions
- Faith In Media Tracker
- Advertise With Us
- Write for Us
- Privacy Policy
- Terms of Service
- Do Not Sell My Data
- Contact Us
- Radiant Digital
- Manage Newsletter Subscriptions
- Unsubscribe From Notifications
- Sitemap
Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.
Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In








