Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Catholic
Politics and Religion
More virtual candles

More virtual candles

Last updated on: June 6, 2017 at 7:37 am by Jane the Actuary

More virtual candles 2017-06-06T07:37:34-06:00 Jane the Actuary

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

London Bridge; from https://www.flickr.com/photos/delaneyr/16274981383; creative commons 2.0

You’re pretty much used to it by now: terrorists attack, whether with guns or bombs or knives or vehicles. And in response: candlelight vigils. Facebook profile frames. “Pray for X” hashtags. And calls not to “overreact,” telling us that the large majority of murders in the U.S. are still your garden variety gang crime in cities. Plus, perpetual squabbles over “Islam”, with one faction claiming that violence is intrinsically a part of the religion and the other side that, by definition “Islam” is peaceful, so any such terrorists are clearly not Muslims and it’s a matter of geopolitics and legacies of colonialism that terrorists tend to come from Muslim communities.

At the same time, no one has any better ideas, or, rather, no one has any practical, implementable ideas that are likely to be effective.

One thing that strikes me is that “their” terrorists are different than “our” terrorists. We are used to the “lone wolf” formulation, and the notion of disaffected second-generation teens becoming drawn to the Islamist jihadist cause online, then sneaking off to Syria/Iraq to join Islamic State. Cynics like to say that all of these so-called “lone wolves” are really “known wolves” – that is, known to the police. But it seems to me that there is a difference between American would-be terrorists making connections online, and their British counterparts. For instance, as The Guardian reports,

Officials confirmed that [Khuram] Butt, 27, who was born in Pakistan but brought up in the UK, was known to police and had been investigated in 2015. He had appeared in a Channel 4 documentary, The Jihadis Next Door, and had been reported to the anti-terrorism hotline for extremism. Butt was also linked to al-Muhajiroun, the banned extremist group whose leader, Anjem Choudary, was jailed last year for encouraging support for Islamic State.

In other words, this is not online self-radicalization. Choudary preached openly, not just in the bowels of the internet.

What’s more, there are some 23,000 individuals identified as jihadist extremists in the UK. As The Australian reports,

About 3000 people from the total group are judged to pose a threat and are under investigation or active monitoring in 500 operations being run by police and intelligence services. The 20,000 others have featured in previous inquiries and are categorised as posing a “residual risk”.

The two terrorists who have struck in Britain this year — Salman Abedi, the Manchester bomber, and Khalid Masood, the Westminster killer — were in the pool of “former subjects of interest” and not now subject to any surveillance.

What do you do with 3,000 people who are identified as supporting terrorism (not to mention the further 20,000, since there’s no mention of why they were determined to no longer be threats)? Assign each of them a lifelong monitor?

Consider, too, Theresa May’s speech (transcript at Time, among other sites). She identifies a four-point plan:

First, “turn people’s minds away from this violence and make them understand that our values – pluralistic British values – are superior to anything offered by the preachers and supporters of hate.”

Second, “reach international agreements that regulate cyberspace to prevent the spread of extremist and terrorism planning.”

Third,

while we need to deprive the extremists of their safe spaces online, we must not forget about the safe spaces that continue to exist in the real world. Yes, that means taking military action to destroy Isis in Iraq and Syria. But it also means taking action here at home.

While we have made significant progress in recent years, there is – to be frank – far too much tolerance of extremism in our country. So we need to become far more robust in identifying it and stamping it out across the public sector and across society. That will require some difficult, and often embarrassing, conversations.

But the whole of our country needs to come together to take on this extremism, and we need to live our lives not in a series of separated, segregated communities, but as one truly United Kingdom.

and, fourth,

we need to review Britain’s counter-terrorism strategy to make sure the police and security services have all the powers they need.

And if we need to increase the length of custodial sentences for terrorist-related offences – even apparently less serious offences – that is what we will do.

It strikes me that there is a missing fifth item, and that’s pushing back against the Middle Eastern oil states which spread their extremist ideology.

But with respect to items #1 and 3, “convert people away from hate” and “don’t tolerate extremism” — well, easier said than done. I’ve seen multiple reports that Muslim communities keep themselves isolated from the mainstream society, and that there has been an unwillingness to call out extremists in the Muslim community for fear of being called racist.

And whatever the correct solution is for extremists in the UK, it’s likely not to be the same for extremists in France or Germany, or in the U.S., since the Muslim communities in these countries all have different ethnic origins and histories in the country and different present circumstances.

Image: London Bridge; from https://www.flickr.com/photos/delaneyr/16274981383; creative commons 2.0

Previous Post

June 3, 2017

We're getting multi-culturalism all wrong

Next Post

June 7, 2017 Oh, fun - Medicaid for all!

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Actuarial/Retirement Issues Politics Uncategorized

Select a Month September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 December 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 August 2021 June 2021 April 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who was the strongest man in the Bible?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Moses Goliath David Samson