From the library: The New Koreans, The Story of a Nation, by Michael Breen

Last updated on: May 11, 2017 at 7:13 am by Jane the Actuary

From the library: The New Koreans, The Story of a Nation, by Michael Breen 2017-05-11T07:13:44-06:00 Jane the Actuary

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

By Raysonho @ Open Grid Scheduler / Grid Engine (Own work) [Public domain], via Wikimedia Commons

How much do you know about Korea? Had you asked me that, before reading this book, I would have been able to tell you that I once owned a Gold Star TV (black and white, bought for $50, and in my bedroom growing up) and was surprised to learn, many years later that this company, known at the time for being cheap, transformed itself into today’s high-end LG appliances. I would be able to tell you, in any event, about the recent phenomenon of “K-pop” since I’d read about that not long ago, but, it seems to me, at the time I read that prior book, I was a bit surprised to read that Korea was really only fairly new, in the grand scheme of things, to the world of democratic governance.

So I’m just going to tell you Things I Know About Korea Now that I didn’t (or knew only vaguely) before reading the book, with apologies to any reader who cringes if I have misunderstood something or am misremembering it as I type this up, or in the case that Breen writes about something as common knowledge if it turns out to be a controversial interpretation.

Here’s some history:

Pre-modern Korea was Confucian in nature. Like China, there was an all-important civil-servant exam. Responsibilities were emphasized, but unlike the traditional reciprocal notions, in Korea, hierarchy was all-important, and everyone who was higher up on the hierarchy than anyone else, lorded it over them — and this included men over women, fathers over sons, bosses over employees, and so on. Social status was rigid, and one was obliged to remain in the same social class (and general class of occupation) as one’s father; slavery even continued up until the turn of the century. There was a monarchy, with civil wars, and coups, and periodic invasions from China, and not an awful lot in the way of innovation or industrialization — to take one example, even though the Korean alphabet is marvelously phonetic, its people were generally illiterate because the upper class didn’t want the lower classes to be educated.

In 1905 unofficially and in 1910 officially, Japan took control and declared Korea to be a colony. But, despite the general image of Japan as a brutal imperial power, and the story, it turns out, is more complicated than that. Though their rule was bookended by periods of repression, especially from 1937 to 1945, when they demanded that Korea “assimilate” by making Japanese the sole language of instruction in schools and even demanding that everyone take on Japanese names, and placed Korea into the same War Economy as Japan itself was, there was a lengthy period in the middle when Japan encouraged Korean development. The colonial period was also a time of industrialization — rail lines were laid, factories built, and so on, in what was at the time a nearly wholly agricultural country. And Japan introduced the modern concept of universal education, with, until the final repressive period, instruction in both Japanese and Korean, and Korean culture flourished.

After the war ended and the Japanese left, both halves of Korea were poor, though, in the north, the Russians and Chinese infused quite a bit of money, and, in the decades that followed, the Kims managed to convince both their own countrymen, but also a fair number of South Koreans, that they were the “true” Koreans, because, despite the heavy infusions of cash, they projected an image of “self-development” that was appealing to at least some South Koreans who felt that their country was being dominated by the U.S.

But after the Korean War, South Korea was devastated — their country was in tatters, they had to absorb large numbers of refugees from the North, they had lost the majority of their industrial capacity, they spent years and years going hungry until the harvest came in, the standard greeting became “have you eaten rice today?”

And, startlingly, Park Chung-hee, who governed the country from 1961 to 1979 as authoritarian dictator, who jailed people for speaking ill of the government, who controlled the press, who prevented elections (or maybe had the standard farcical elections), nonetheless worked wonders with the Korean economy, bringing the Koreans out of poverty and transforming the country into a modern, developed country.

Yet this experience doesn’t give a pass to those who say, “eh, this proves that democracy’s not all it’s made out to be.” The Koreans, and especially students, and particularly during the 80s, protested mightily in their demand for free elections, and finally won them in 1987. In fact, Breen tells a story which is food for thought in current debates about U.S. relationships with dictators: if I’ve got it right, as the presidency was transitioning from Carter to Reagan, the then-dictator (nominally president) Chun Du-Hwa was planning to execute a jailed opposition leader. Reagan’s diplomats intervened, and promised him that he would be the guest of honor at the first Reagan White House State Dinner if he stayed the execution, and further extracted a promise that Chun would leave office when his term of office expired, which, in fact, transpired, though initially Chun stacked the deck in his favor, or, rather in favor of his chosen successor, and only after mass protests did he agree to a set of reforms that gave opposition candidates a real chance. Interestingly, according to Breen, the successor, Roh Tae-woo, won anyway, but the public was satisfied that it was a true fair election.

Of course, since then, Korea has had further stumbles, including the impeachment of its most recent president, which occurred after the book was published.

But Breen’s book also discusses modern-day Korea and its culture. There is not really a culture of vacationing, or at least, not within Korea, and no tradition of appreciation of nature, though there has been a substantial degree of reforestation in recent years. There’s also not much in the way of historic cities, or historic sections of cities, due to wartime destruction and postwar rebuilding without the efforts (e.g., in Germany) to reconstruct replicating the old city; my impression from the book was that Korean cities consist of high-rises as far as the eye can see. It is still very hierarchical, which makes for, among other things, very unpleasant working environments for those on the bottom, as everyone mistreats those who are lower in status than they are. Breen also characterizes the culture as emphasizing the group, and fitting in with group, and making decisions based on what the Group thinks. He also describes Koreans as, despite superficial cheeriness, unhappy, even depressed as a rule — citing high suicide rates and low birth rates as evidence. And there is a deep sense of insecurity — both of individual Koreans and how they perceive themselves individually, and how Koreans see their country in the world.

So I don’t really have a big point to this post except that it’s very interesting to contemplate how quickly a country can change, and yet how profoundly, even in “everyone’s the same” 2017, cultures differ.

Image: By Raysonho @ Open Grid Scheduler / Grid Engine (Own work) [Public domain], via Wikimedia Commons

Uncategorized

Korea

Previous Post

May 10, 2017

What's the purpose of an aquarium?

Next Post

May 12, 2017 Girl Boy Scouts, update

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Actuarial/Retirement Issues Politics Uncategorized

Select a Month September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 December 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 August 2021 June 2021 April 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What does "Gethsemane" mean?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Oil press Spring Olive tree Garden