Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Catholic
Politics and Religion
Hold the mocking on the Civil War . . . Trump isn’t as wrong as you think he is

Hold the mocking on the Civil War . . . Trump isn’t as wrong as you think he is

Last updated on: May 4, 2017 at 11:24 pm by Jane the Actuary

Hold the mocking on the Civil War . . . Trump isn’t as wrong as you think he is 2017-05-04T23:24:18-06:00 Jane the Actuary

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

In the news today, President Trump said that Andrew Jackson could have prevented the Civil War from happening, had he lived a bit later in time. And twitter freaked out and was convinced he was a moron.

What he said, specifically, was this:

I mean had Andrew Jackson been a little bit later you wouldn’t have had the Civil War. He was a very tough person, but he had a big heart . . . He was really angry that he saw what was happening with regard to the Civil War, he said, ‘There’s no reason for this.’

. . . People don’t realize, you know, the Civil War, if you think about it, why? People don’t ask that question, but why was there the Civil War? Why could that one not have been worked out?

And, as it turns out, Jackson was president during a precursor incident, the Nullification Crisis (see wikipedia as well as a PJ Media article by Tyler O’Neil), in which South Carolina asserted that it nullified federal tariffs that it opposed. Jackson responded by sending warships to South Carolina, rejecting the notion that a state had the ability to nullify a federal law as tantamount to treason, and worked to get Congress to pass a bill authorizing military force to enforce the tariffs, while at the same time, compromising by reducing the tariff itself, and South Carolina backed down.

In May 1833, Jackson wrote that “the tariff was only the pretext, and disunion and southern confederacy the real object. The next pretext will be the negro, or slavery question.”

These words are quite frankly stunning. In 1861, South Carolina would again nullify federal law, formally seceding from the Union, mentioning the slavery question. A later president, Abraham Lincoln, would also argue that if states can nullify laws or leave the Union, the U.S. is not a nation.

Chillingly, the Civil War started in that same Charleston harbor, as Confederate troops fired on the Union outpost of Fort Sumter, and the rest is history.

Trump is correct — Jackson condemned the movement which later birthed the Confederacy and the Civil War. He even took two of the exact same actions Abraham Lincoln would later take — defending Charleston harbor and declaring that nullification/secession is a cause for military force against the South.

Jackson was able to bring about a compromise that averted the Civil War in 1833. It is impossible to know if he would have been able to achieve this in 1861.

Now, to be sure, it’s possible that Trump really had no idea what he was talking about. It’s likely that he only heard a broad statement rather than knowing particularly many details, and whether Trump thought Jackson was alive, just retired from politics at the time of the Civil War, or whether he misspoke and was thinking of the prior crisis, we don’t know. After this flew through Twitter, Trump himself tweeted what seems to be a clarification of this latter item, or at least a claim of such:

President Andrew Jackson, who died 16 years before the Civil War started, saw it coming and was angry. Would never have let it happen!

— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) May 2, 2017

But his detractors are gleeful. They think he didn’t know the cause of the Civil War:

Trump asks why the Civil War started.

Because folks that would have eagerly voted for Trump didn't wanna give up their slaves.

— Tea Pain (@TeaPainUSA) May 1, 2017

(•_•)
<) )╯The Civil War
/

(•_•)
( (> was 100%
/

(•_•)
<) )> about slavery.
/

— Christina Grace (@C_GraceT) May 1, 2017

"Why was there a Civil War?" – @realDonaldTrump @POTUS

Because people wanted to keep owning other people, you absolute vapid moron.

— John Pavlovitz (@johnpavlovitz) May 1, 2017

And so on.

But why did the North/South divide on slavery come to a head in 1861? Was it inevitable that a war would be fought? Certainly, slavery was a root cause, but was it the proximate cause? It’s not as if the North, due to a majority in Congress, had outlawed slavery, or declared its intention to do so. It is not unreasonable to suggest that a different set of actions would have produced a different outcome. Was a war inevitably set in motion when Lincoln was elected? Could a Nullification Crisis-like response have avoided secession, or brought those states back in without a war?

And the U.S. was not the only slaveowning country; some abolished slavery sooner, others later, but the U.S. was, to my knowledge, the only country that ended slavery as a result of a war.

Now, we can debate whether the Civil War was “worth it” – worth the casualties, that is: 620,000 dead, 476,000 wounded, for the final outcome of the end of slavery sooner than otherwise. We can discuss the contrafactual of “when would slavery have ended, if not due to the Civil War?” Or we could even take the position that the Civil War was unavoidable.

But, of all the foolish things that Trump has said, this one just doesn’t seem to qualify as meriting the hysteria.

Image: Civil War re-enactors. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File%3ACivil_war_reenactment_1.jpg; By Daniel Schwen (Own work) [CC BY-SA 4.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0)], via Wikimedia Commons

Previous Post

April 30, 2017

Let's pay to pee!

Next Post

May 2, 2017 The perils of the diversity crusade

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Actuarial/Retirement Issues Politics Uncategorized

Select a Month September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 December 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 August 2021 June 2021 April 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What did Moses' staff turn into as a sign for Pharaoh?

Select your answer to see how you score.

A serpent A frog A branch A dove