Patheos

BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Patheos

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

janetheactuary

“Separate and unequal” school-funding discrimination? Not so fast!

Last updated on: February 15, 2017 at 9:28 am   by Jane the Actuary

“Separate and unequal” school-funding discrimination? Not so fast! 2017-02-15T09:28:48-06:00 Jane the Actuary

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Forrest Claypool, from https://vimeo.com/146044058

The Chicago Public Schools, and its CEO Forrest Claypool, in a long-running battle to get more pension bail-out money from the state, has now filed a lawsuit, alleging unequal state funding and claiming that this is racial discrimination because of the disproportionate number of students who are “of color” (that is, black or Hispanic) in Chicago public schools.  (See today’s Tribune.)

What’s going on here?  Illinois Policy rebuts the claim that CPS children are being treated unfairly.  In all of the school-funding allocations from the state, Chicago schools come out far, far ahead because the funding is weighted heavily to districts with high levels of poor, minority, special ed, and/or English-learning children.

What’s Claypool’s case, then?  He says that Chicago only gets 15% of state funds while it has 20% of students, because (though the Trib article doesn’t explicitly say this) he’s adding in the state contributions to the teachers’ pension plan for non-Chicago teachers.  Illinois Policy provides a chart which (though it only covers the years to 2014) reports that this total percentage has varied from year to year depending on the level of pension contributions.  in 2014, Chicago received 17.6% of funding, when considering pension contributions, but a decade ago, in 2006, (when presumably Illinois was taking another one of its repeated pension contribution holidays), Chicago received 24.0% of total funding; the number’s been steadily declining since then, so perhaps if the chart were extended two more years, this would match Claypool’s claim of 15%.

Does Claypool have a case?  Maybe.

The Chicago Teacher’s Pension Fund was established in 1895, by the state legislature, to be a self-governing, self-funding entity.  The Illinois Teacher’s Retirement System was first created in 1915, then re-established in 1939.  So far as I can tell, the local employer contributions have always been modest, and, according to the TRS itself,

From the beginning of TRS in 1939, teacher contributions were never intended to fund 100 percent of a member’s retirement annuity. As in all defined benefit retirement plans, the benefits have always been a shared responsibility of the members and the employers, which in the case of TRS are school districts and state government. TRS is responsible for investing these contributions and adding all investment returns to the trust fund to enhance its ability to pay member benefits. The state, by law, assumes the lion’s share of the employer’s cost because state government requires all active public school teachers outside of the city of Chicago to be TRS members. Also, all public school districts are creations of state government.

Which seems like a pretty lousy rationale to me, especially when it’s the local school districts that are setting teacher pay.

You want a fix for this disparity?  Well, aside from the need for the state pension system to be wholly reformed, seems to me that it should come in the form of local school districts being responsible for the cost of annual accruals, based on appropriate actuarial assumptions.  (It’s fine for the state to manage the whole system, to provide continuity for teachers moving from one school district to another.)  Or perhaps the Chicago teachers should begin to participate (again, for new accruals) in the statewide system.  But “fairness” doesn’t require that the State pick up the funding deficits that were due to irresponsibility by the city of Chicago in years past.

 

Image:  Forrest Claypool, from https://vimeo.com/146044058

Uncategorized

Chicago

pensions

school funding

Previous Post



February 14, 2017

From the Library, Under the Sun

Next Post



February 15, 2017 More to the story: a "heroic" 5th grade basketball team?


Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Actuarial/Retirement Issues Politics Uncategorized

Select a Month September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 December 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 August 2021 June 2021 April 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013


Follow Us!

Follow Us on Facebook Follow Us on Twitter



TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What part of the body does the Breastplate of Righteousness protect?

Select your answer to see how you score.

The head The back The stomach The heart

Related posts from Jane the Actuary

Family

Parsing Mayor Lightfoot's Inaugural Address

Jane the Actuary

Family

Just when you think the Jussie Smollett case...

Jane the Actuary

Family

Mayor Santa Claus and other post-election thoughts

Jane the Actuary

Family

It's time for Chicago politics!

Jane the Actuary

TRENDING AT PATHEOS Catholic

The Iron Gates and the Lion of the...

  Yesterday, I didn't finish my report about, well, yesterday.  So I'll...

Dolly Parton’s Last Song Wins Dove Award with...

Bluegrass band The Grascals, speaking on the red carpet at the 57th...

The Image: On the Horror of Capitalism and...

The Image Then went the Pharisees, and took counsel how they might...

Thoughts about Halloween

We are approaching the date of our new American national holiday: October...

Letters on Living the Faith by C.S. Lewis

Most of us met C.S. Lewis as a public intellectual. Mere Christianity....

When Halloween Unmasks Married Hearts

Written by Dr. David K. Ewen from Eternal Truth Bible College Behind...

view all Catholic blogs

Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube