Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Catholic
Politics and Religion
What’s Pena Nieto’s agenda?

What’s Pena Nieto’s agenda?

Last updated on: January 27, 2017 at 10:12 am by Jane the Actuary

What’s Pena Nieto’s agenda? 2017-01-27T10:12:49-06:00 Jane the Actuary

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

from pixabay.com; https://pixabay.com/en/border-mexico-usa-united-states-62866/

In the news yesterday were reports (e.g., CNN) that Mexican President Enrique Pena Nieto cancelled a planned meeting with President Trump (yeah, it’s crazy to write that!) after disputes over Trump’s plan to build a wall and pass on the costs to Mexico.

Now, it seems to me that back during the election, pundits liked to say of Trump’s “Mexico will pay for it” claim, that he was just staking out a negotiating posture, so that, in the end, the Mexican government would come back with something like, “OK, fine, build the wall if you want, but we won’t pay for it.” But it seems that Pena Nieto’s objection is to far more than a wall, but to Trump’s plans to cut off illegal immigration and deport criminals. According to CNN:

“I’ve asked for the minister of Foreign Relations to re-enforce protection measures to our citizens,” [Pena Nieto] said. He added that the 50 Mexican consulates in the US will be used to defend the rights of immigrants in the country and issued a call to action to legislators and civic organizations to help immigrants.

CNN also reported,

In a Monday speech, Peña Nieto said his government is prepared to negotiate with the US if Mexico’s national sovereignty is respected. He laid out economic integration and respect for the rights of migrants and the money they send home as his nation’s key negotiating points.

And I’ve read time and again that Mexican migrants in the U.S. send large sums of money back home, that the Mexican government actively works, through the consulates and other outreach activities, to keep Mexicans in the U.S. connected to Mexico to keep the money flowing, that some villages are nearly completely lacking in young men, since they have all left for America and send money back to their parents. And CNN reported just the other day that remittances are so high that the cash brought in exceeds that of Mexico’s oil imports.

Oh, and the populist candidate in Mexico’s 2018 presidential election, Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador, has called for the Mexican government to file a lawsuit “at the U.N.” over the wall, as a “violation of human rights,” is planning a tour of the U.S. to speak to Mexicans there, and calls out in his rallies:

“Go and fight for liberty, represent our people with dignity and all human beings who dream of a just world. . . Defend the migrant Mexican workers, long live the immigrants!”

Which all paints a picture of a country in such dire straights that it relies on the money brought in by migrants to keep its people fed, and so desperate to keep this pipeline flowing that it will do whatever it can to keep the border open, both through its own policy actions and by calling on Mexicans in the United States and their supporters to oppose the wall.

But so far as I can tell, keeping NAFTA in place is far more crucial to the Mexican economy.

The amount of remittances sounds large when compared to oil exports, but this is only 2.3% of the Mexican GDP. For your reading pleasure, take a look at this table from the World Bank with remittance percentages for all countries. This highest percentage is in Nepal, 31.8%. In the Americas, Haiti is at 25%, Honduras 18%, El Salvador 16.6%, Guatemala 10.3%, and Nicaragua 9.4%. Looks to me like the biggest remittance-related risk of wall-building and border-sealing is not that Mexico would lose its inflows but that it would be facing its own illegal immigration problem if Central Americans flock there instead of the U.S. (But we’re told that immigrants are great for building the economy, right?)

Manufacturing, on the other hand, has seen massive growth since the introduction of NAFTA in 1994. According to fivethirtyeight.com’s summary,

Mexico’s economy has long depended on trade with the U.S., and those ties have only deepened since 1994, when the North American Free Trade Agreement lowered trade barriers between the two nations. Mexican exports more than quadrupled since NAFTA went into effect; they accounted for 37.5 percent of Mexico’s gross domestic product in 2015 (they make up just 12.3 percent of the U.S. economy), and more than 80 percent of those exports go to the U.S. Mexico is now the world’s fourth-largest car exporter, and the automobile industry directly employs almost 900,000 workers across the country.

Free trade — along with relatively skilled but cheap labor — has also drawn businesses and their investment dollars into the country. For the past two decades, Mexico has been Latin America’s second-largest recipient, after Brazil, of what economists call foreign direct investment — foreign companies building factories, buying businesses or investing in Mexican companies. In 2015 alone, Mexico received a total of $32 billion dollars in FDI, $17 billion of it from the United States.

This is where the real money is. Is Pena Nieto so determined to preserve the flow of migrants to the U.S., and money back, that he’ll imperil the country’s export economy?

Breitbart claims that Pena Nieto has a hidden motive: that he really wants to keep the drug cartels in business because they funded his campaign. How plausible is this? I don’t know.

But for Mexico to stake its relationship with the U.S. on the continuation of a semi-open border? It seems shortsighted.

Image: from pixabay.com; https://pixabay.com/en/border-mexico-usa-united-states-62866/

Previous Post

January 26, 2017

Week 1 (so far): The Executive Orders

Next Post

January 28, 2017 Trump's "Muslim Ban" executive order: the good, the bad, and the ugly

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Actuarial/Retirement Issues Politics Uncategorized

Select a Month September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 December 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 August 2021 June 2021 April 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

How was Haman punished for his plot?

Select your answer to see how you score.

He was beheaded He was hanged on the gallows he built He was exiled He was turned into a pillar of salt