Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Catholic
Politics and Religion
Week 1 (so far): The Executive Orders

Week 1 (so far): The Executive Orders

Last updated on: January 26, 2017 at 9:43 pm by Jane the Actuary

Week 1 (so far): The Executive Orders 2017-01-26T21:43:58-06:00 Jane the Actuary

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

So now it’s the turn of the Democrats to say, “if you didn’t like Obama’s executive orders, you ought to be outraged at Trump, because he’s doing the same thing.”

Is he? Obama’s most notorious executive order was DACA, which was a matter of taking the executive power to determine not to deport certain individuals, and applying this to the better part of a million people. OK, that’s not true — is most notorious was DAPA, which would have covered 5 million people had the court not blocked it.

Are Trump’s orders exceeding his authority and effectively going so far as to be legislating? Let’s see . . .

There are multiple lists of his executive orders so far, from CNN, for example. And the White House website even includes links to the text. Let’s look at them:

“Minimizing the Economic Burden of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act Pending Repeal.” According to CNN,

The directive called on the secretary of health and human services, in addition to other agencies, to interpret regulations as loosely as possible to minimize the financial burden on individuals, insurers, health care providers and others.

What does this mean? One possible implication I could envision is that the determination of when an individual has a hardship that exempts him or her from the mandate is apparently somewhat cryptic, so this could be loosened. But other than that, I don’t really know of regulations that can be interpreted, at this point in time anyway. Is this intended to “bypass Congress”? I don’t really see the point of it when it’s a given (to my understanding) that Congress has the power to implement a repeal by making use of certain loopholes This is so vague as to largely be symbolic, as far as I can tell.

2. “Expediting environmental reviews and approvals for high profile infrastructure projects.” This order calls on the departments charged with environmental review to deliver their reviews more quickly. Are there any concrete actions to be taken as a result of this order? Probably not, so far as I can tell, except to set a general tone.

3. “Border security and immigration enforcement improvements.” This order increases border patrol by 5,000 agents, and directs the building of the wall. Now, I’ve read that Congress has already passed legislation authorizing the building of the wall, but that was never completed (see Wikipedia, though it’s not clear on the outcome); the issue seems to be that Trump couldn’t start building without the appropriate appropriation. And, in fact, the order itself includes as one component, making the necessary appropriation requests from Congress.

4. “Enhancing public safety in the Interior of the United States.” This aims at tripling the number of agents tasked with interior immigration enforcement, adding 10,000 new agents. This also cuts funding from sanctuary cities, though there are disputes about what types of funding Trump may unilaterally cut — and, indeed, the statement is that funds will be cut to the extent permitted by law.

Now, these are the only Executive Orders in CNN’s list because the remaining actions are “executive memoranda” — and these are:

“Memorandum for the Heads of Executive Departments and Agencies”: this halts any new regulations until the administration can review them, and is, CNN reports, standard for a president coming into office.

2. “Regarding the Mexico City Policy” — this re-implements the Mexico City Policy that says that organizations that perform or promote abortions are ineligible for federal funding in family planning programs abroad. The abortion-rights crowd, every time a Republican president takes office, says that the sky is falling. Honestly, corporations have spin offs and divestitures all the time — is it really so out of the question to spin off the abortion-providing arm of an international family-planning organization?

3. “Regarding Withdrawal of the United States from the Trans-Pacific Partnership Negotiations and Agreement.” Not a big surprise that Trump would withdraw from the TPP, which had not been ratified by Congress, nor even submitted for ratification.

4. “Regarding the Hiring Freeze”: a foolish policy, it seems to me, but I can’t say whether it exceeds his authority. I suppose if this were to stay in place for the long term, it would be a sort of legislating, if it pares away the workforce so much that laws passed by Congress are simply not able to be administered.

5. “Construction of American Pipelines”: All pipelines shall consist, to the extent permitted by law, of American materials. I don’t get this: pipelines are built by private entities, and not under contract to the American government but for their own business purposes, right? Is Trump claiming the authority to mandate this? Are the weasel words of “as permitted by law” the indicator that this is another one of his efforts to, shall we say, strongly encourage businesses do abide by his wishes?

6. “Regarding Construction of the Keystone XL Pipeline”: Invites the pipeline company to resubmit its application, and calls for an expedited 60 day approval process, but doesn’t guarantee approval.

7. “Regarding Construction of the Dakota Access Pipeline”: restarts the approval process for the DAPL.

8. “Streamlining Permitting and Reducing Regulatory Burdens for Domestic Manufacturing”: which seems to generically say that approvals for manufacturers should be expedited.

So I’m not really seeing anything that’s a shocking overreach, but, on the other hand, I’m not sure what to make of many of these.

The only ones that appear to be concrete actions are the Mexico City Policy, the hiring freeze, and the TPP withdrawal; the others seem to be more statements of policy.

And the moratorium on refugees, and visas from certain Middle-Eastern countries? This is still in draft form, not signed or officially released yet.

So I’m simply not sure what to make of anything yet. When will Trump propose actual legislation, or will he wait for Congress to do the same, or will he find that that’s much harder work than a photo-opportunity signing of an Order or Memorandum prepared by his staff?

Uncategorized

executive orders

Trump

Trump's First 100 Days

Previous Post

January 24, 2017

Looking for vacation ideas

Next Post

January 27, 2017 What's Pena Nieto's agenda?

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Actuarial/Retirement Issues Politics Uncategorized

Select a Month September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 December 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 August 2021 June 2021 April 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Besides Samuel, Elkanah and Hannah had this many children.

Select your answer to see how you score.

8 0 5 2