Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Catholic
Politics and Religion
Trump’s “Muslim Ban” executive order: the good, the bad, and the ugly

Trump’s “Muslim Ban” executive order: the good, the bad, and the ugly

Last updated on: January 29, 2017 at 10:27 pm by Jane the Actuary

Trump’s “Muslim Ban” executive order: the good, the bad, and the ugly 2017-01-29T22:27:13-06:00 Jane the Actuary

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

The bad:

First, some context. Per a UN site,

The 85,000 refugees resettled to the United States in FY 2016 included 16,370 from the Democratic Republic of the Congo, 12,587 from Syria, 12,347 from Myanmar, 9,880 from Iraq and 9,020 from Somalia.

In addition,

In FY 2016, 12,587 Syrian refugees were admitted into the US, compared with 1,682 in 2015, exceeding the target of 10,000 set by President Obama.

Pew provides a further breakdown, and reports that 46% of refugee admissions where Muslim, 44% Christian, and 10% other/no faith — though that’s hard to piece together from their table, which breaks down admissions by country of origin — I just can’t find enough Christian-majority countries in this list to account for 44% of the total. (Bhutan? This is an ethnic group called the Lhotshampa, who came to the U.S. by way of Nepal, being driven out of Bhutan into refugee camps in the late 80s/early 90s.)

http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2016/10/05/u-s-admits-record-number-of-muslim-refugees-in-2016/

There are refugees all over the world seeking entry into the United States, as well as an additional 16,000 granted asylum (2015 figures; the latest available, from this report found via nolo.com). Yet there are 15 million-ish refugees in refugee camps seeking refuge; clearly our admission of a tiny percentage is just symbolic.

But here is Trump’s order:

(c) Pursuant to section 212(f) of the INA, 8 U.S.C. 1182(f), I hereby proclaim that the entry of nationals of Syria as refugees is detrimental to the interests of the United States and thus suspend any such entry until such time as I have determined that sufficient changes have been made to the USRAP to ensure that admission of Syrian refugees is consistent with the national interest.

(d) Pursuant to section 212(f) of the INA, 8 U.S.C. 1182(f), I hereby proclaim that the entry of more than 50,000 refugees in fiscal year 2017 would be detrimental to the interests of the United States, and thus suspend any such entry until such time as I determine that additional admissions would be in the national interest.

Yes, we delude ourselves if we imagine that just because you’re in a refuge camp, you’re a lover of democracy and equal treatment. Many of those in Syrian refugee camps, in particular, have not fled ISIS so much as the Assad regime, and could just as easily be supporters of extremist Islam as not, but in either case prefer living in a refugee camp to fighting in a war zone. And there are serious assimilation problems with refugees already in the United States; a December 2015 David Frum Atlantic article highlights many of these with respect to the Somali community here.

But the “national interest”? It would be in the “national interest” to erase the refugee program entirely, wouldn’t it? The entire idea of the refugee program is to do something which lies outside the national interest, to in some small way provide aid to individuals who are not American.

It is appropriate to ensure that the refugee-admissions program does not harm our country, that we take in no more refugees than can properly be assimilated, that we screen potential refugees to ensure those we admit have the potential to be assimilated, and that we provide such funds as are needed to aid in their assimilation.

But to hold the admission of Syrian, or any refugees, to a standard of meeting a “national interest”?

To quote a certain commercial: “that’s not how this works. That’s not how any of this works.”

Next: The ugly.

Go back Continue Reading

Previous Post

January 27, 2017

What's Pena Nieto's agenda?

Next Post

January 28, 2017 5 myths about the Holocaust

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Actuarial/Retirement Issues Politics Uncategorized

Select a Month September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 December 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 August 2021 June 2021 April 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

How did God speak to Moses at the burning bush?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Through wind Through lightning Symbols from the fire By name