Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Catholic
Politics and Religion
Aleppo: this is what war is like

Aleppo: this is what war is like

Last updated on: December 20, 2016 at 12:32 pm by Jane the Actuary

Aleppo: this is what war is like 2016-12-20T12:32:34-06:00 Jane the Actuary

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

This is a post I’ve been sitting on for a while, as the situation in Aleppo develops and I try to figure out how to put my thoughts together. But here it goes:

Is Aleppo a genocide? No. The government is not seeking to exterminate people based on their ethnicity.

In fact, near as I can tell, they’re not trying to exterminate people at all – their objective is not to kill the civilian population of eastern rebel-held Aleppo. It’s to re-take the city of Aleppo. What they’re doing is fighting a war. And at the same time as they’re fighting for control of eastern Aleppo, rebel forces are attempting to seize various other government-controlled towns, though these battles are not as dramatic, and frankly I have no idea how the civilians are faring.

But I suspect that we in the United States have created a new image of what war means, and our mental image comes from the initial overrunning of Saddam’s forces in Iraq: U.S. bombing campaigns with smart bombs eliminating military targets, and a ground campaign in which the opposing forces surrender. Or maybe we imagine Paris in World War II, when first the French surrendered before the Germans got that far, so that the Nazis marched in triumphantly; then the Germans retreated from Paris rather than force the Allies to fight them among the boulevards. Instead, the two armies fought each other on battlefields, for instance, in the Battle of the Bulge.

The reality is that war is brutal and that, Geneva convention or no, civilians suffer and civilians die.

Fallujah.

Grozny.

Warsaw.

Dresden.

Berlin.

Stalingrad and Leningrad.

Yes, I’m going back to World War II, since I’ve got a bit of a knowledge gap in-between.

But all the cries of “save Aleppo” leave me struggling to understand exactly how that might happen.

Syrian government forces and rebel forces are in the middle of a war. Neither side is willing to retreat. Each side is backed by outsiders. And for all the talk of, well, talks, I don’t see anything from the reports I’ve read that either side is willing to agree to even modest concessions or compromises to end the war, much less the far greater surrender of a substantial power-sharing agreement. And the situation in Aleppo demonstrates that in two ways: first, the Syrian government’s determination to retake the city regardless of casualties, and, second, well, it would seem to me that the attacks could have ended long ago with the negotiated surrender of the city, but surrender simply wasn’t an option, only, when its fall became inevitable, an evacuation to other rebel-held areas.

A couple days ago, The Daily Beast published an article about the situation in Aleppo which quotes rebel forces:

TDB: “Do you expect all the remaining besieged neighborhoods will fall by tomorrow?”

AA: “No. Except over the body of every civilian. I won’t surrender my body, and my wife, and my daughter to the Assad regime without defending them… I hope that you’ll tell everyone what I’m saying.”

Why not surrender? The rebels claimed that Syrians were summarily executing civilians, and those who lived were taken to concentration camps. They further reported that 20 women committed suicide to avoid rape.

How much of this is propaganda? How much is truth? What is the true fate of civilians in recaptured areas? I don’t know. And that lack of knowledge is part of why I’ve sat on this post for a while.

So I just don’t see an answer here. I don’t see a way that the West, the United States, can “do something” — other than after-the-fact aid to Syrians in refugee camps. Can we really choose a side here? After all, the rebels aren’t noble “good guys” either – part of the reason the cease-fire allowing them to retreat was delayed, was that they refused to allow a parallel cease fire in certain towns they’re bombarding, to allow the Syrian government to evacuate the wounded, and even after this was granted, reports claimed that they torched the evacuation buses. And, now that the Russians have sided with Assad, for the U.S. to escalate our role would only bring us into a new Cold War-style proxy war.

About the best we can do, so far as I can tell, is revisit the start of the civil war and try to understand whether there was anything that the U.S. or the EU could have done before things got this far — and that only as a “lesson learned” for the next time a war threatens that there may be some means of stopping.

Image: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File%3ABombed_out_vehicles_Aleppo.jpg; By Voice of America News: Scott Bobb reports from Aleppo, Syria [Public domain], via Wikimedia Commons. Note the photo dates from 2012, so at the start of the war.

Previous Post

December 12, 2016

High-tech NFP: 30 years of missed opportunities?

Next Post

December 21, 2016 Should we abandon the Electoral College?

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Actuarial/Retirement Issues Politics Uncategorized

Select a Month September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 December 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 August 2021 June 2021 April 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What Christian group believes in baptism for the dead?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Latter-day Saints Pentecostals Anglicans Presbyterians