Patheos

BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Patheos

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

janetheactuary

Go McMullin! and other t-minus-7-days thoughts

Last updated on: November 1, 2016 at 9:42 pm   by Jane the Actuary

Go McMullin! and other t-minus-7-days thoughts 2016-11-01T21:42:05-06:00 Jane the Actuary

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Hillary’s e-mails are a big nothingburger, says the Left.  She was careless, but has admitted as such, and no spies have died as a result, and the so-called “classified” information was really nothing serious.

Hillary’s e-mails are yet another instance of corruption, says the Right.  She thought she was above the law, and she set up a private server in order to hide her Clinton Foundation dealings, and it’s all part and parcel of a massive scheme to enrich the Clinton family.

James Comey is a crook, making decisions in order to affect the election, says the Left.

James Comey is a hero, impartially seeking justice no matter the personal cost, says the Right —

Oops!  Except that prior to Friday those two opinions of Comey were reversed.

It’s nuts.

I am still convinced that Comey knows something we don’t, because the accusations that he’s intervening without justification for his own personal gain or to get his preferred candidate elected, simply don’t make sense.  What he is doing is destroying, not aiding, his career, and I find it equally improbable that he simply made a big mistake.

What exactly was uncovered, no one knows.  But what spooks me is the prospect that, after Clinton is elected, or, if not then, then after she takes office, these various investigations will be quashed.  After all, the latest news is that the individual heading up the new investigation is another crony, close to Podesta.

And, yes, I said “after Clinton is elected,” rather than “if Clinton is elected,” because at this point, so far as I can see, Trump has to win pretty much every “battleground” state, as currently defined, and that seems altogether too improbably, though, to be sure, fivethirtyeight.com does grant him a 30%-ish chance of winning after the weekend’s news.

So what, by the way, does that have to do with McMullin?

Consider what I’ve already said:  if you’re in Utah, vote for McMullin.  If you’re in a non-battleground state, vote for McMullin.  And if you’re in a battleground state?

That’s the challenge, isn’t it?  There’s an argument to be made that battlegrounders should vote for Trump, even if they want McMullin to win, because the only way a McMullin scenario works is for Trump to win the necessary states, to ensure that Clinton doesn’t get a majority.  But if you’ve reconciled yourself to Clinton winning, despite it all, because even wide-scale corruption isn’t enough to make Trump palatable for enough people, then McMullin has something to offer:  if Clinton wins against Trump, end-of-story, then it seems to me that the political landscape post-election would be different if there is a significant showing for McMullin, representing “I believe in conservative/Republican principles but oppose Trump,” as opposed to Trump or nothing (or write-ins that don’t get counted, or only voting down-ballot).

After all, what does happen post-election is a big unknown.  Will the messages of protectionism and immigration enforcement/restrictionism be taken seriously, or laughed away as discredited by Trump’s loss?  Will Republican principles, broadly speaking, be likewise declared by the media and conventional wisdom, as similarly dead?  I don’t know, but I do think that, though I don’t know exactly how, the calculus would be different with McMullin, and measurably McMullin votes, in the picture.

And in the meantime — well, this is the year when the Cubs have made it to the World Series, and to game 7 of that series, to boot.  So anything can happen, right?

Politics

Election 2016

McMullin

Previous Post



October 29, 2016

My pet theory on the FBI and the e-mails

Next Post



November 2, 2016 The FDA, Lady-Comp, and a few questions


Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Actuarial/Retirement Issues Politics Uncategorized

Select a Month September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 December 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 August 2021 June 2021 April 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013


Follow Us!

Follow Us on Facebook Follow Us on Twitter



TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What is the name of the great final battle in Revelation?

Select your answer to see how you score.

The Great Tribulation Babylon’s Fall Apocalypse Armageddon

Related posts from Jane the Actuary

Family

Trust an Actuary: The Social Security Fairness Act...

Jane the Actuary

Family

Some words in support of "No Labels"

Jane the Actuary

Family

News from the world of English Language Learning

Jane the Actuary

Family

Week 4: The Flynn leaks, and, when do...

Jane the Actuary

TRENDING AT PATHEOS Catholic

Thoughts about Halloween

We are approaching the date of our new American national holiday: October...

Letters on Living the Faith by C.S. Lewis

Most of us met C.S. Lewis as a public intellectual. Mere Christianity....

When Halloween Unmasks Married Hearts

Written by Dr. David K. Ewen from Eternal Truth Bible College Behind...

Jesus Was Not an Aristotelian

Aristotle. He’s been called the father of logic, the father of the...

Methodist Central Hall and Westminster Abbey

Situated on the same square is Methodist Central Hall and Westminster Abbey. ...

57th Dove Awards Honor Dolly Parton, Crown New...

On gospel music’s biggest night, the 57th annual GMA Dove Awards honored...

view all Catholic blogs

Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube