Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Catholic
Politics and Religion
R.I.P., ITT Tech

R.I.P., ITT Tech

Last updated on: September 16, 2016 at 8:20 am by Jane the Actuary

R.I.P., ITT Tech 2016-09-16T08:20:15-06:00 Jane the Actuary

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

For the longest time, I couldn’t make sense of ITT Tech. After all, here in Chicago, we’ve got the IIT, or the Illinois Institute of Technology, an expensive private university which is perhaps not at the same level as MIT or CalTech, but the same idea, anyway. So what is ITT? Is it related somehow? Ultimately I googled the name and learned that it stands for International Telephone and Telegraph (nothing to do with “Illinois”!), and that’s just because the company happened to buy a for-profit college and gave it its name.

Anyway, as you may have read, the company shut down its operations just before the fall term was scheduled to begin. (See here for a report immediately after the announcement, here for a Trib report, yesterday, that the company will cease all operations, and here for a Fortune report, also yesterday, that they’re preparing to file for bankruptcy.) This was the final outcome of a chain of events which began with federal regulatory scrutiny not of its academic programs but its financial health. Like a struggling family pushed over the edge by the escalating impact of bad credit making loans ever more costly and difficult to repay, federal demands due to its finances turned them from financially weak to closed entirely. Per the New York Times,

This month, ITT was put on notice that it was in danger of losing its accreditation, which would mean an immediate cutoff in access to government loan programs. That threat helped prompt education officials to demand last week that ITT come up with an additional $153 million in credit within 30 days, to cover potential student refunds in case of a shutdown. According to its most recent quarterly filing, though, ITT had only $78 million in cash on its balance sheet.

That same article reports that ITT has been under scrutiny since 2014, but provides few details, but for an anecdotal case of a nursing student disenchanted with the poor quality of the instruction that left graduates unable to pass the nursing examinations, but who felt trapped because she couldn’t transfer her credits elsewhere.

An article in the Times from a year ago provides further context and, more interestingly, links to a report on the subject of for-profit schools converting, supposedly, to non-profit status, but with the former owners of the for-profit entity still continuing to profit as board members, through directing favorable contracts their way, and in other convoluted ways. Which doesn’t have anything to do with ITT Tech but is interesting anyway.

But you’d think that there’s no inherent reason why universities should always and only ever be non-profit (or state owned). After all, we don’t demand that our cars be made by non-profit groups, and say that there’s no way a for-profit car manufacturer could ever be trusted to provide us with a quality product.

And, realistically, as enrollment patterns change over time, and as student enrollment increases in general, if for no other reason than population growth, you’d think that for-profit companies would be a key part of a system that is responsive to student needs.

But it seems to me that there are two keys to ensuring that for-profit companies provide a quality education:

First, the refund policy must be sufficient for a student to be able to withdraw if, after an adequate length of time, the student discovers that the instruction isn’t up to snuff. What would that look like? Realistically, probably more generous than a proportionate refund, to ensure that universities, whether for- or non-profit, work at providing a quality program and students don’t stay merely because of sunk costs.

And, second, the credits earned must be transferable; nontransferability of credits seems to be the biggest difficulty, as it traps students into continuing at the school. How do you tell if credits are transferable? The ITT site was taken down fairly quickly after they shut down, so there’s not much to be learned there. At the University of Phoenix, they publish a Consumer Information Guide (is it mandatory? I don’t know), which says:

University of Phoenix has established reverse transfer agreements with partnering institutions. With a reverse transfer agreement in place, University of Phoenix will notify the partner transfer institution and provide academic records, including an official transcript, for a student who has consented to the release of his or her records to a previously attended institution who also meets certain credit requirements that indicate the student may be eligible to earn an associate degree from the transfer institution. The transfer institution may pursue communication with the student to discuss requirements and may award the associate degree to the student per its discretion after an official credit evaluation is conducted.

Sounds good, but I don’t know, and wasn’t able to find, information on how well this works in practice. Same with DeVry, what I’m finding are discussion boards complaining that, in practice, universities only accept transfer credits as electives. And some time ago, I remember reading about a student who completed an entire bachelor’s program at a for-profit school, discovered that she couldn’t find a job nor could get get admission to grad school with her degree, and, incredibly, continued on at the same school’s graduate program rather than recognize that she needed to start over elsewhere.

As it happens, various of the top hits in a google news search for the school are articles about community colleges offering to work with ITT students to help them transfer credits into programs they offer, either directly or via waived fees for credit-by-examination options. Here’s an example from the St. Louis Post-Dispatch:

ITT Tech students have a few issues when it comes to transferring classes. First, the defunct college makes a point of saying that credits likely won’t be transferrable. That’s not the case for many local schools, including St. Louis Community College, that are finding equivalencies between courses so students can carry as many credits as possible toward a new degree. . . .

Jefferson College, a community college in Jefferson County, is also ready; so is Ranken Technical College and even Webster University, which allows students to transfer in as many as 30 credits that meet the university’s program demands.

Both Jefferson College and Ranken are working to identify what courses and credits can reasonably transfer. At Ranken, Missy Borchardt, dean of enrollment management, said credit-by-assessment exams will be the best bet for ITT Tech students. Ranken is waiving fees for ITT Tech students to take such exams to figure out what classes will count toward their degrees.

Unfortunately, there’s an element of moral hazard here: students who were recent graduates or current students at ITT can apply to have their federal student loans discharged, unless they transfer their credits to another school. (See the official Secretary of Education notification.) I suppose in the “credit-by-assessment” case they could claim that a student is not being direct transfer credit for an ITT class, so as to preserve eligibility, but it’s a perverse incentive to walk away from everything.

But it seems to me that these two components — generous refund policies and meaningful transfer-out options — really ought to be a part of the basic requirements for any college seeking federal financial aid for its students. The latter might be difficult to work out in its particulars — how, after all, would a school document that its classes are transferable at a sufficient number of other schools? — but it’s key, because it would force companies to ensure their courses are high quality, and it would ensure that they compete to keep their students, rather than holding them with the sunk costs of nontransferable credits.

Image: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File%3AITT_Technical_Institute_campus_Canton_Michigan.JPG; By Dwight Burdette (Own work) [CC BY 3.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0)], via Wikimedia Commons

Uncategorized

ITT Tech

universities

Previous Post

September 15, 2016

Another reason Catholic doctrine pairs marriage and children

Next Post

September 17, 2016 #ExpandSocialSecurity, in practice

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Actuarial/Retirement Issues Politics Uncategorized

Select a Month September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 December 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 August 2021 June 2021 April 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who was thrown in a lion's den and survived?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Joshua Paul Peter Daniel