Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Catholic
Politics and Religion
What does it mean to be a Republican?

What does it mean to be a Republican?

Last updated on: August 11, 2016 at 8:15 am by Jane the Actuary

What does it mean to be a Republican? 2016-08-11T08:15:29-06:00 Jane the Actuary

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

from Pixabay (public domain), https://pixabay.com/en/republicans-elephant-political-party-303843/

So, look, it’s no surprise that I identify with the Republican Party, but let’s break this down. What do I think of as being Republican Party values?

With respect to the economy, it means a belief that self-reliance and free enterprise are the keys to a strong and growing economy. While a safety net is important, the plain fact of the matter is that a generous social welfare state simply doesn’t work in the long run, and that innovation in private business is what makes our economy healthy, and, ultimately, wealthy. Punitive levels of taxation and regulation, or special treatment for favored industries (“crony capitalism”), might benefit the taxers and regulators, but do more harm than good in the long run. And strong families, with mothers and fathers, are a key ingredient as well, rather than treating single parenting (and government benefits) as the norm.

And by the way — the Tea Party? The Republican Party has a track record of claiming to support fiscal responsibility, but not following through. The Tea Party’s primary objective was to hold the GOP to that promise.

With respect to foreign policy, it means a belief that the United States has a responsibility, as a Superpower, to intervene in world affairs to promote human rights and oppose oppressive regimes, with due recognition of all the pragmatic realities of the world. And it means a strong national defense, prepared to intervene at any point that it becomes necessary.

It means a belief that free trade benefits everyone, in the long run, and that, even as Americans working in particular industries may struggle as a result, we’re better off if it trade brings prosperity to poor nations.

With respect to civil rights and minority-group interests, well, Republicans would say that they unhesitatingly believe in equal treatment under the law, but at the same time, identity-group politics, meant to advance the causes of minorities, taken too far, do more harm than good, by sorting us all into identities based on ethnic origin and sex.

With respect to “life issues” — well, once upon a time, this wasn’t a partisan issue, and it was possible to be pro-life and either a Democrat or a Republican. Not any longer.

And the Second Amendment? Well, I don’t know that there’s anything distinctively Republican about opposing gun control, but wasn’t a lot of the partisan sorting-out on this a regionalism thing? That is, once the coasts and the cities, without traditions of hunting or self-defense, had become Democratic strongholds, pro- and anti-gun control sorted out in that manner.

With respect to immigration, well, it’s hard to fit this one in. It wasn’t a partisan issue for many years. I oppose an amnesty program unless it genuinely, believeably has a design that ensures it’ll be a one-time amnesty, not just the next in the series, but I don’t know whether I can reasonably claim that this is a distinctively Republican point of view. The Gang of 8 amnesty try was bipartisan, and the 2006 try was as well. To be sure, this is an alignment of business interests and Hispanic voting bloc supporters/panderers, and those who genuinely and truly believe in open immigration–and the sort of open immigration that these programs promise (via their “guest worker” programs) is supported by politicians and opposed by the grassroots. In a way that’s been a problem, to have a divisive issue where the Republican Party finds itself unable to explain its principled beliefs.

So look at this list of issues. What am I missing? Sure, I’m glossing over issues, simplifying, and partisan Democrats may or may not start hyperventilating and saying that Republicans hate the poor and want them to suffer, but you get my general point: there is no free lunch.

And here’s the problem with the Republican Party: Donald Trump is not a Republican. He arbitrarily and randomly promises government programs, he rejects free trade, he promotes an isolationist foreign policy.

Now, to be sure, he’s not the only Republican who fails this test, though others do in different ways. Many “RINOs” legitimately found their way to the Republican Party as being the closer match, of the two, to their beliefs, but others, unfortunately, in their effort to advance their political fortunes, moved ever closer to that accusation of Republicans as corporate shills.

But if we ask the question, “what happens to the Republican Party after Trump?” we have to acknowledge two things:

First, that Trump took over the Republican Party for his own purposes, and,

Second, that Republican leadership let this happen. Why? Partly perhaps because they believed they could benefit from his celebrity. Partly it was the fault of men like Chris Christie, who figured they’d benefit from a Trump rise. Because of the foolishness of the other candidates, for whom the goal of reaching the nomination was more important. Their supporters, who never cut them off. A winner-takes-all primary system designed to get the eventual nominee to the finish line quickly, without regard for the fitness of that nominee, or, rather, under the assumption that any such nominee would be sufficiently fit and the benefit of a quick nomination process would outweigh the moderate disadvantage of a less-perfect nominee. And a view of the Republican Party as a mechanism for advancing one’s political career, to be used by whoever chooses to do so under the “Republican” mantle.

The end result: for many Republicans, there is no true Republican in this election, so there is no betrayal to the Republican Party in not voting for Trump.

What will the Republican Party leadership do when the election is over?

Unfortunately, they’ll likely declare it to have been a nightmare of no relevance to anything.

What should they do? (Well, besides listen to me, that is.)

Well, among other things, they need to decide for themselves and then communicate to the country what it means to be Republican, as a brand identity, if you will — that is, assuming that they believe any of it in the first place.

image from Pixabay (public domain), https://pixabay.com/en/republicans-elephant-political-party-303843/

Politics

Republican Party

Previous Post

August 9, 2016

What about Nada Meawad?

Next Post

August 12, 2016 Objecting to objection: Abortion in Italy

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Actuarial/Retirement Issues Politics Uncategorized

Select a Month September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 December 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 August 2021 June 2021 April 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Which ancient city is famous for its towers and the confusion of languages?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Sodom Babel Nineveh Babylon