Slate author: no such thing as a “male body”

Last updated on: July 25, 2016 at 6:50 pm by Jane the Actuary

Slate author: no such thing as a “male body” 2016-07-25T18:50:47-06:00 Jane the Actuary

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

No surprise, I guess, but a Slate author, Chase Strangio, went further than I’ve yet seen towards making the assertion that whether one is male or female has only to do with how one identifies, and nothing at all to do with one’s physiology.

Most insidious, we use the same language that opponents of transgender people use, carelessly referring to women who are trans as having “male genitals” or being “born with a male body” or being “anatomically male.” This language is both factually wrong and dangerous.

There is plainly no one type of body that we could accurately label a “male body.”

At birth, we classify infants as male or female based solely on the appearance of their external genitalia. Notably, this classification serves population control and surveillance and not medical purposes. The medical experts I have spoken with could not identify a single medical purpose for assigning sex at birth and explain that the components of sex are far more complex than just external genitalia and include, at least, chromosomes, genes, hormones, internal genitalia, gender identity, and secondary sex characteristics. By embracing a narrative that one is born with a “male body,” we reinforce the idea that only the bodies we assign male at birth— bodies that have medically normative penises— are male.

But that simply isn’t true. It is a choice to refer to some bodies as male and some bodies as female, not a fact. Our genital characteristics are one component of who we are and do not define, medically or biologically, our sex. . . .

I was assigned female at birth, but I have never had a female body. If it takes longer to convince the world of that than it would to simply say that I was born with a female body but am now male, I am invested in that longer path, because ultimately we will all be better off when we can challenge the idea that our body parts define us.

As usual, Strangio then takes the small percentage of the population born intersex to make a generalized, universal, claim — that because there are exceptions to this general rule, the rule itself doesn’t exist. (What next? There’s no such thing as “rich” and “poor” because some people are middle class and fit in neither category?)

The very notion that classifying people as “male” or “female” is about “population control and surveillance” is bizarre. It is of medical significance to treat individuals with the capacity for getting pregnant differently from those with the capacity for impregnating others — and fairly foolish to abandon a word that is descriptive of this difference. Even in childhood, it is relevant to note whether a child is “male” or “female” as development is monitored. In other areas of life (among them, competitive sports), it is important to distinguish between individuals of a chromosomal type that means their adult bodies are, in general, significantly larger and more muscular, vs. smaller and less muscular. Why would we abandon the use of the words “male” and “female” to describe these categories of people?

What Strangio is proposing simply, to define “female body” as “the body of someone who, at that point in time, identifies as female,” doesn’t just defy common sense; it renders the words without meaning. The word Orwellian is overused, but, if anything fits that label, this is it. And Strangio’s side is, right now, winning the political battle.

Clarification: I’ve written on transgender issues before. Except for a small minority, humans can be classified as “male” or “female” by their chromosomes and physiology; the remaining small percentage are legitimately indeterminate and intersex. Commenters claiming that my statment means that a woman with a masectomy or a hysterectomy is no longer a woman are deliberately missing the point. I’ve said in other posts that I recognize that for most advocates of “identity” as the determinant, they believe that identity is shaped in a real way by one’s brain, so this is just as real and “physiological” as anything else. What’s more, the recognition of an individual who has undergone a hormone regimen and the relevant cosmetic surgery, as having “changed sex,” is a legal construct, not a “true fact.”

All this aside, transgender advocates are taking things to a wholly new level in denying that “male” or “female” has anything to do with physiology.

UPDATE: Here’s another article, from Buzzfeed. A transgender individual, identifying as a woman but without any of the relevant surgery, called up a salon for a Brazilian wax, then filed a complaint when the tech refused to do the job, seeing as how the salon only provided genital waxing services for women, and considered the male anatomy to require training their techs didn’t have.

Karen Parker, a researcher at La Trobe University, booked a Brazilian wax at Brazilica, in Brunswick, as a birthday present to herself in October last year.

However, when the waxer saw Parker had not had sex reassignment surgery, she immediately said it wasn’t possible.

“She said ‘Let’s get started’, I took the towel off, she looked at me in horror,” Parker told BuzzFeed News. “I felt really humiliated.”

Uncategorized

transgender

Previous Post

July 20, 2016

Was the failed coup a Reichstag fire?

Next Post

July 21, 2016 And when neither evil is "lesser"?

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Actuarial/Retirement Issues Politics Uncategorized

Select a Month September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 December 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 August 2021 June 2021 April 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What island was John on when he wrote Revelation?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Cyprus Patmos Crete Malta