Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Catholic
Politics and Religion
Seven “Brock Turner” observations

Seven “Brock Turner” observations

Last updated on: June 10, 2016 at 6:21 am by Jane the Actuary

Seven “Brock Turner” observations 2016-06-10T06:21:12-06:00 Jane the Actuary

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

In case you’ve been living under a rock, a 20-year old man was sentenced to 6 months in jail and a lifetime on a sexual offender registry for the sexual assault of a 23-year-old woman, generating considerable outrage at the leniency of the sentence. Here’s a report from CNN, and here’s the letter that the victim read in the courtroom, which provides further details.

The attack in question occured in the back alley of a fraternity at Stanford University after both individuals had been drinking heavily, generating another round of debates about whether she should have, in fact, not be drinking, and whether he was given the light sentence because he was white, or an athlete.

Do I have an opinion on this? Sure, of course, but I’m not going to join the outrage either way. (Not because it isn’t outrage-worthy, but because I’m just not keen on shouting in outrage.) So let’s just call these observations instead.

Number One:

If this case were a simple matter of two drunk individuals hooking up, then the “drunk” narrative would have made sense.

There have been reports of instances in which a man and a woman, both drinking, both equally initiating a sexual encounter, both consenting in the ordinary definition of the term, neither capable of consent in the legal definition, have sex — and the man is found guilty, at law or in a college tribunal, of rape. See this incident out of Occidental College reported last year.

There are also at least some college administrators, who hold these hearings and administer the penalties, who have said they genuinely believe that, in such cases, men are indeed at fault, no matter what the context was. See this article from Slate, also from 2015, for background on this discussion: men are deemed “at fault” for the presumption that, if a man is physically capable of having sex, he can’t be “too drunk to consent”; or, in other tellings, men are “at fault” because they’re not (as) troubled by it as the women in those pairings are.

This is the context. The reason why Brock Turner has defenders is that the story seems to them to fit into this narrative, so people have assumed it was a similar he said/she said case.

Number two:

It should go without saying that this case doesn’t actually fit the “they were both drunk” narrative. She had passed out, for crying out loud! That’s where the narrative changes. Now, Turner’s claim is that he didn’t realize she had passed out, and it was mere coincidence that the two other men happened upon the scene when they did, because otherwise, he would have certainly realized that was the case and ceased. This is, to say the least, unlikely.

Now, I’ve never been passed-out drunk. I’ve never blacked out. I don’t know if a person who is on the verge of passing out is unmistakably physically incapacitated, nearly-immobile, or if, to anyone near them, they just appear, well, ordinary-level drunk. I suspect that movies and TV aren’t a good guide here. Is the fact that she passed out, but not he, an objective measure that she was the drunker one, or that he was sufficiently non-drunk to know what he was doing? Or is passed-out-ness not an adequate marker? (And, yes, I tried unsuccessfully to find answers online.)

But once she passed out? This can’t seriously be a question.

And for him to blame “the culture” for his misdeed? No.

Number three:

What is rape? Did Brock Turner rape his victim?

It’s a strange thing, this.

A fellow blogger is quite explicit: “if you penatrate a person’s anus or vagina, however slightly, with any body part or instrument, against their will, that is rape,” which matches the official FBI definition. But the actual crimes for which he was convicted were (courtesy a National Review piece by Mona Charen)

intent to commit rape, sexual penetration with a foreign object of an intoxicated person, and sexual penetration with a foreign object of an unconscious person.

Now, I don’t know how they determined that he “intend[ed] to commit rape.” It almost seems that he intentionally didn’t rape her — or else he would have before he was interrupted. In his telling, that of two drunk people hooking up, he did what would have called, back in the day, “getting to third base,” depending on your numbering system. And my, say, 20-year-old self would have said there’s a big difference between third base and “sexual intercourse.”

And to read the victim’s account, while knowing I could be wrongly interpreting her words, it seems as if what was horrifying to her was not this “penetrative” aspect of the incident, but the larger violation of being essentially naked with this stranger, and, perhaps even more, having been found naked by other strangers. Would there have been criminal charges that could have been brought if his finger hadn’t been where it doesn’t belong?

Number four:

What is the right penalty for non-rape sexual assault, compared to other crimes? If, rather than this incident, Turner had been found punching (that is, non-sexually assaulting) a man or a woman, what would have been his jail sentence? Yeah, I don’t know either.

Number five:

What about drinking?

Do we really have to go through this all over again?

It’s inadvisable to leave your purse sitting on the car seat, then walk away and leave the car unlocked. Yes, the individual who sees this opportunity to open the door and take the purse is still a thief. But, yes, you also could have prevented this by locking the door and keeping the purse out of view.

Are you somehow morally to blame for allowing the purse to be stolen? No. But it’s still appropriate advice to keep purses out of sight and doors locked.

Or, heck, some time ago, I left my wallet in the shopping cart at the grocery store. Turns out, a customer found it, and, recognizing the address, drove over to drop it off.

Was I morally at fault for potentially enabling someone to steal my wallet? No, of course not. But it was a careless thing to have done and I’m just grateful to have gotten it returned.

And in both instances, a person taking the purse/the wallet would have still been a thief. Would the penalties have been the same, as for a mugger, or a pickpocket? I don’t know. Is the degree of moral fault the same, based on formal moral teaching or our internalized sense of right and wrong? I likewise don’t know. But that doesn’t mean we should all leave our valuables unattended.

But, number six, there’s another issue:

Back in the day, why, yes, I did drink in college. And somehow it seemed that the more I drank, the more protective the men around me became. Heck, that’s when Dave walked me home, and made it clear that he was interested in dating me, but didn’t make any other move than kissing me on the cheek. And another time, Snake (yes, that was his nickname) — well, he got all gentlemanly and kissed me on the hand after walking me home. Now, I wasn’t interested in dating either of these men, but each of them were, according to stereotypes, potential sexual-assaulters, at least in terms of their drinking and partying habits (though Snake professed that he’d sobered up), but none of us had any concern that they would do so, nor do I really recall any more generalized concern of “be careful, he might rape you.”

To be sure, though, these were just parties hosted by friends, or by someone in a very extended circle of friends. I never had any connection to Greek life.

But it is disturbing that, in the year 2016, kids can be shamed, formally by administrators and among their peers, for failing to address a person by their proper pronouns, but men aren’t shamed by other men for taking advantage of women, and aren’t encouraged by their “culture” to be helpful instead. Maybe we’re just too much a Scouting family: “A Scout is Trustworthy, Loyal, Helpful, Friendly, Courteous, Kind, Obedient, Cheerful, Thrifty, Brave, Clean, and Reverent” and promises to “help other people at all times.” But maybe the attention to “social justice” (proper pronouns, white privilege awareness, etc.) has crowded out issues around binge drinking and basic decent behavior. Or maybe the attention to dictating “rules” (don’t microaggress, for instance) means that the larger idea of “be a decent person” is gone.

Because whatever else is true about Brock Turner, he is doubtless missing that moral compass that would have simply said, “she’s drunk,” and walked away, or gotten her home. And there seems to be a whole world of kids missing that moral compass, who probably think of themselves as “good people” nonetheless.

Oh, and number seven, the dad complaining about the injustice of a punishment for “20 minutes of action”? Parents are protective of their kids. How many times have you read in the paper of a murder suspect whose parents said, “he couldn’t have done it, he’s a good kid”? Which means that, regardless of anything else, this is not something to freak out about.

Uncategorized

Brock Turner

sexual assault

Previous Post

June 7, 2016

Sanders supporters: you were robbed (sort of)

Next Post

June 10, 2016 The Jane the Actuary "10 and change" challenge

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Actuarial/Retirement Issues Politics Uncategorized

Select a Month September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 December 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 August 2021 June 2021 April 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What year did Martin Luther post his 95 Theses?

Select your answer to see how you score.

1600 1517 1401 1492