Love is love is love is . . . hate?

Last updated on: June 15, 2016 at 1:42 pm by Jane the Actuary

Love is love is love is . . . hate? 2016-06-15T13:42:43-06:00 Jane the Actuary

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

The two emerging narratives coming across my facebook and twitter feeds could not be more different. In the one, we need to face up to, and respond to, the fact that ISIS, and Islam in general, are hostile to homosexuality*; the attack at the Pulse nightclub is no different than ISIS attacks in Paris and Brussels. In the other, the killer’s religion is immaterial, his anti-gay animus came from the wider (Christian) culture, and the way to stop these attacks is by banning semi-automatic weapons, and, with respect to the wider culture, for Christians to fully embrace sexual minorities.

Hence, the twitter hashtag “love is love” and the Lin-Manuel Miranda “sonnet” with the line “love is love is love is love is love is love is love is love.”

No, I don’t have links. Just typing up a few reflections as I’m struggling with what to do with this. That which should unite us is instead dividing us, as gay-rights activists direct their anger at Christians, and insist that professions of sorrow and sympathy by Christians are invalid unless they embrace gay marriage and welcome pre-op transwomen into the girls’ and women’s locker rooms and sports teams, and bake the cakes and sign the wedding licenses, and take sexual activities off the Sin List.

And at the same time, there are new narratives emerging. The killer had anger issues, or was mentally ill, supposedly, so that his actions are no different than other mass killers. He was, we’re told gay, so his act was a sort of self-hate — though it’s not clear whether his prior visits to the club were because he “belonged” there or because he was casing out the place.

One writer at The Federalist even rejects the premise that the club was targeted because its patrons were gay, both because he cased out Disney as well and because at no point in his 911 calls did he mention that as a motive.

To be sure, the nightclub was a soft target if ever there was one: according to an eyewitness account in the New York Times (which I can’t find any longer; here’s a similar account), the place was so loud and dark and crowded that he was able to shoot repeatedly before clubgoers fully understood what was going on. The witness describes thinking it was part of the music, or maybe a firecracker, or maybe just a hoax. It’s also easy to imagine that the killer would, due to stereotypes, consider a bar full of gay men as unlikely to fight back. It also seems to me that I read not long ago that drug use is high among gay men — it’s not reported anywhere, but if the killer figured on the clubgoers being high on drugs and all the more unable to comprehend and fight back, that’d add to his choice of target. And it was a small place, with little more than just the dance floor and the restrooms, and no easy way to flee.

But despite all these potential reasons why he’d pick a place like this, it seems unlikely that the gay clientele was not a factor in his choice.

And, not surprisingly Trump has doubled-down on his call for a moratorium on immigration from terrorist-origin countries, and Obama has doubled down on his insistence that there is no such thing as “radical Islam.”

Oh, and gun control. What can I even say here? the Left insists that an AR-15 is a military weapon wrongly in the hands of civilians, the Right says that they’re wrong on all accounts; it’s an ordinary hunting rifle. The Left further insists that we need an “assault weapons ban” and the Right replies that there’s no such thing as an “assault weapon” and the now-expired legislation banned guns based on cosmetic features that made them look “scary” but didn’t have an effect on their functionality. I don’t really know what the solution is. Maybe the Right should just shrug and say to the Left, “fine, if it makes you happy to ban scary-looking guns, go for it.”

But at the same time, in the Orlando shooting, I’ve read accounts and can’t really piece together exactly how he killed so many so quickly. Was it really as simple as “shooting ducks in a barrel”, and the dark, the noise, the crowds, the confusion, and (possibly) the drug use making the clubgoers easy prey? I have read statements that there were gun battles, but nothing I’ve seen really gives a good sense of it all. Would any sort of gun legislation, other than a total ban or a restriction to single-bullet guns, have made a difference?

So what next?

It seems rather likely that this is just the next in a series of attacks. Nothing in the way the nation, or our politicians, are responding suggests that we’ll see any actions that will prevent the next attack, or attacks months or years into the future.

(* UPDATE: I put this asterisk there intending to add a parenthetical comment that I forgot about until rereading the post. My thought was this: it strikes me as odd that “homosexuality” or “gays and lesbians” has been replaced, by those speaking the preferred lingo, as “LGBT people” (or add to the acronym as desired, e.g., LGBTQ, LGBTQIA, etc.) After all, a gay man or a lesbian woman is simply different than a transgender person who is different than an intersex person. And I would further think that an acronym would feel too impersonal for people to be willing to adopt that label as an identity. But this is parenthetical.)

Uncategorized

Orlando

radical Islam

Previous Post

June 13, 2016

"10 and change": Retirement

Next Post

June 18, 2016 London, Part 1

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Actuarial/Retirement Issues Politics Uncategorized

Select a Month September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 December 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 August 2021 June 2021 April 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What did Lamentations describe happening to Jerusalem?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Its prosperity Its blessing and expansion Its destruction and mourning Its rebuilding