Patheos

BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Patheos

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

janetheactuary

How do you identify?

Last updated on: May 26, 2016 at 12:09 pm   by Jane the Actuary

How do you identify? 2016-05-26T12:09:12-06:00 Jane the Actuary

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Transsexual — what an archaic term!  How quickly we’ve moved from the notion that a person “changes sex” by undergoing surgery, combined with a legal declaration, to the idea that it’s all about how you “identify” — and that your “gender identity” could be pretty much anything and society, institutions, and individuals, must comply with your preferences regarding acknowledgement of that identity.

Yes, I know, there is a reasonable-people-disagree type of claim that someone who is transgender experienced brain development in utero that caused the discord between that person’s biological sex, and the deep inner sense of self, and that this “brain sex” is so deeply imprinted that the only solution to deep mental distress is surgery and hormone administration combined with legal recognition of the alternate sex.  But it is new, and radical, to insist that rather than this discord requiring that you change your physical appearance and legally-recognized sex, to instead say that your self-perception/identity is — all by itself — the sole determinant of whether you are male or female.

Recall that the notion of “gender” originated as a way to talk about the social construction of masculinity vs. femininity, that is, such things as social norms of suits vs. dresses, short vs. long hair, and trucks vs. dolls — and, in fact, came into use at a point when it was believed that these preferences, and, in fact, all differences besides basic physiology, were all socially constructed, rather than at least partially inborn.

It then evolved as a way to speak of the identification of men vs. women without having to use the word “sex,” which became to icky to put on a form as a checkbox, since its prior multiple meanings became so overshadowed by the meaning of “sexual intercourse.”   (Poll:  do you ask expectant parents, “do you know the sex” or “do you know the gender of the baby?”)

But now?  “Gender” is becoming irrevokably paired with “identity” — and at the same time, according to those cutting edge ideas which ultimately filter to the mainstream, it’s meaning is being expanded far beyond “male vs. female.”  There’s “gender nonconforming,” to start with, agender, gender-fluid, and the rest of Facebook’s infamous list of 51 “gender identities.”  (Though, despite all the fuss about this, I wonder if they’ve removed this entirely, as I don’t see this anywhere on facebook itself.)

And it seems to me that the notion of “gender” has now evolved into a specification of personality type that’s becoming so disconnected with its original meaning as to become, well, useless, for the purpose of talking about the question of “are you physiologically male or female or indeterminite?” (and by the third category I mean that small number of people with intersex conditions, for whom their physiology, not their identity, is at issue).

The concept of “gender identity” has become a sort of stand-in for “important thing about you that you want the world to recognize.”

And this notion of the primacy of “identity” seems to be everywhere. Rachel Dolezal notwithstanding, one’s racial/ethnic status is expressed in terms of “identity” rather than the geographic origin or kinship group of one’s ancestors.  To read many of the protesters at universities, for instance, it is crucial to them that this identity be affirmed and validated by the universities they attend, and (sorry, no links right now) it’s become increasingly common for students and activists to name their identities, and put them front and center.

In fact, there was a striking article on The Federalist the other day, “How Anti-White Rhetoric Is Fueling White Nationalism,” the main point of which was this:

White people are being asked—or pushed—to take stock of their whiteness and identify with it more. This is a remarkably bad idea. The last thing our society needs is for white people to feel more tribal. The result of this tribalism will not be a catharsis of white identity, improving equality for non-whites. It will be resentment towards being the only tribe not given the special treatment bestowed by victimhood.

A big part of the reason white Americans have been willing to go along with policies that are prejudicial on their face, such as affirmative action, is that they do not view themselves as a tribe. Given the inequality of resources favoring whites in our society, it is a good thing that white people view themselves as the ones without an accent. Should that change, white privilege (whatever one views that to be) will not be eviscerated—it will be entrenched.

Do I identify as white?  As middle-class?  As a woman?  As “cis”?  As Christian?  These are all characteristics, to be sure, but in the end, I suppose I’d really have to “identify as” an introvert.

Yes, it’s because, when you’re in the majority, you don’t perceive this characteristic as being something distinguishing.  But this isn’t “white privilege” since (I presume) it’s exactly the way Muslims experience their Muslim-ness in, say, Jordan, or Han Chinese experience their Han Chinese-ness in China.

But having said all that, if you replace “I identify as” with “I indentify with” — the meaning changes completely.  “I identify with the Germans being innundated with migrants claiming asylum because my husband is German,” is perfectly natural.

So, readers, what about you:  what do you “identify as”?  Who do you “identify with”?

Uncategorized

identity

transgender

Previous Post



May 23, 2016

Art and Memory in Elgin

Next Post



May 29, 2016 On Obama's Hiroshima speech - and a sense of history


Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Actuarial/Retirement Issues Politics Uncategorized

Select a Month September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 December 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 August 2021 June 2021 April 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013


Follow Us!

Follow Us on Facebook Follow Us on Twitter



TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

How many times does Jesus perform a miracle in the Gospel of John?

Select your answer to see how you score.

7 10 5 12

Related posts from Jane the Actuary

Family

Trans Kids and Data Analysis: Understanding the "Gender...

Jane the Actuary

Family

The end of "boys who wear dresses"?

Jane the Actuary

Family

Yes, you should object to saying "they"

Jane the Actuary

Family

Why the Equality Act is actually much worse...

Jane the Actuary

TRENDING AT PATHEOS Catholic

When Halloween Unmasks Married Hearts

Written by Dr. David K. Ewen from Eternal Truth Bible College Behind...

Jesus Was Not an Aristotelian

Aristotle. He’s been called the father of logic, the father of the...

Methodist Central Hall and Westminster Abbey

Situated on the same square is Methodist Central Hall and Westminster Abbey. ...

57th Dove Awards Honor Dolly Parton, Crown New...

On gospel music’s biggest night, the 57th annual GMA Dove Awards honored...

The First Eucharistic Controversy: Christ’s Real Presence

For Catholics, the Eucharist is the source and summit of the Christian...

What a Stop Sign Can Teach Us About...

How to Make a Decision When You Can't Hear God Main point:...

view all Catholic blogs

Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube