Patheos

BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Patheos

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

janetheactuary

Hillary Clinton proposes massive increase in the cost of childcare!

Last updated on: May 17, 2016 at 4:41 pm   by Jane the Actuary

Hillary Clinton proposes massive increase in the cost of childcare! 2016-05-17T16:41:30-06:00 Jane the Actuary

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File%3AUS_Navy_050114-N-3659B-050_he_Morale_Welfare_and_Recreation_Child_Development_Center_on_board_Naval_Support_Activity_Mid-South_in_Millington%2C_Tenn.%2C_provides_daycare_services.jpg; By U.S. Navy photo by Photographer’s Mate 3rd Class Joseph M. Buliavac [Public domain], via Wikimedia Commons

Affordable healthcare . . .

Affordable housing . . .

Affordable tuition . . .

And now, affordable child care.  Ever notice how “affordable” now means “government subsidized”?

Hillary Clinton has now proposed a new government program, the objective of which is to subsidize child care to according to the principle that no family should pay more than 10% of their income for child day care expenses.  At the same time, this would be paired with a set of incentives for child care centers to raise pay for their workers to the level of kindergarten teachers.  She did not specify how either of these elements would be funded, or how the government would control pay scales for private workers (perhaps some decree to retain eligibility for government funds such as the lunch program?).

See reports from the Huffington Post and Politico, and commentary from the Washington Post and the Wall Street Journal (google search terms RAISE initiative child care).

And, incidentally, a chart was floating around the other day showing that the cost of child care + university tuition was skyrocketing, but it was rather senseless to combine these two.  Here’s the CPI data on childcare costs, compared to general inflation (yes, this isn’t the BLS site, but it’s where I landed via google and perfectly suitable for the purpose), and here’s a quick table:

childcare inflation

Now, clearly, daycare costs are rising at levels greater than general CPI, and that really shouldn’t be a surprise, as expectations for daycare have similarly increased:  even without government mandates or incentives, parents are looking for “high quality” programs.  What’s more, costs are very heavily due to employee wages, so, even though wages have stagnated recently, it’s reasonable for childcare costs to outpace general inflation, since there’s little to be gained in the way of productivity, just a minimal amount of improvement in back-office functions.

But what would daycare look like if it was massively subsidized by the government?

A straightforward Obamacare-like subsidy that limits family cost to 10% of salary would, for most families, wholly remove financial incentives from childcare provider decisions.  If the feds pay the difference whether you select an in-home daycare or The Goddard School, you’d choose The Goddard School, no?  And the number of families whose income is high enough that they’d still be paying full cost in any case is likely a relatively small enough proportion that the families with no cost incentive would spark a rush towards higher fees funding higher salaries, fancier facilities, longer hours, and, of course, higher profits for owners.  One could imagine two tiers of childcare, those attended by voucher-families, and those attended by pay-your-own-way families – but there’s likewise a good chance that it would simply become the norm that everyone pays 10%.  (And how’s the 10% determined?  Based on only the custodial parent, or adding in both parents’ income?)

Of course this wouldn’t be sustainable, would it?  It’d be like college tuition subsidies, except to a more extreme degree, as it wouldn’t be a matter of just some families shrugging off the cost as covered by income-based loans, but nearly all families doing so.

So presumably, the feds would establish a maximum reimbursement level.  Heck, they already do, when it comes to daycare benefits for poor families.  Here are the rates in Illinois:  $46.49 for up to a twelve hour day for an infant in the Chicago area, lower for other ages and locations.  That’s $12,000 per year, which seems generous but full-time care at the local Kindercare is now up to $389 per week, or $78 per day, or $20,000 per year.  (I dug up the tuition rate sheet from 2007 for comparison, which was still tucked away in a folder, and it was $298 then; seems like a huge jump but it’s exactly 3% per year.)  Do they offer discounts to families on vouchers?  I don’t know, but, persumably, even if they do so now, they couldn’t possibly do so if everyone was using a voucher.

Which would mean that “middle class” reimbursement levels would have to be set much, much higher, especially if they want to set caregiver pay higher as well.  How do they determine the right level?  Perhaps this would effectively mean that daycares would function more like regulated utilities, with permitted reimbursement levels growing as different criteria are met, and with set criteria required for basic eligibility, including not just the existing metrics of caregiver: child ratios and other regulations having to do with health and safety, but requirements regarding payroll levels, staff turnover and credentials, submission of planned curriculum, etc.  How would they determine the “right” reimbursement level for a center to meet all their metrics and still stay in business?  That’s the trick, isn’t it?  Do they go for generous funding, or risk levels low enough that they can’t get enough people to hang up their shingle in the first place?

But the bottom line would be that daycare costs would be whatever the government decrees them to be, unless the government subsidy buys so little as to be useless.

And, no matter what, this would mean that home daycares would pretty much disappear, given that the government and NGOs already have it as their stated policy that “high quality child care” is by definition provided in an institution, where children are separated by age into “classrooms,” where the days are tightly structured, with reading lessons added in for the 3s and 4s.

In fact, back in September, I wrote about the Center for American Progress’s proposal for a broadly-available “high quality child care tax credit,” which was intended to move families to institutional daycare.  The strange thing about this proposal is that it envisioned a total cost of $14,000 per child, much lower than Kindercare’s $20,000, though, to be sure, that was for infant care in a high cost area.

So, bottom line:  massive increase in child care cost, paired with massive shift in who pays, from a parental responsibility to make decisions as a family, with assistance for the poor, to another social welfare program.

 

Image:  https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File%3AUS_Navy_050114-N-3659B-050_he_Morale_Welfare_and_Recreation_Child_Development_Center_on_board_Naval_Support_Activity_Mid-South_in_Millington%2C_Tenn.%2C_provides_daycare_services.jpg; By U.S. Navy photo by Photographer’s Mate 3rd Class Joseph M. Buliavac [Public domain], via Wikimedia Commons

Uncategorized

child care

childcare

Previous Post



May 16, 2016

Books are not ephemera

Next Post



May 18, 2016 The Archdiocese of Chicago provides parental leave - yea! (or not?)


Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Actuarial/Retirement Issues Politics Uncategorized

Select a Month September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 December 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 August 2021 June 2021 April 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013


Follow Us!

Follow Us on Facebook Follow Us on Twitter



TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Which book is the largest by chapters in the Bible?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Isaiah Psalms Proverbs Genesis

Related posts from Jane the Actuary

Family

Tennessee "free pre-K" update: from no effects to...

Jane the Actuary

Family

Is there a "summer care gap"?

Jane the Actuary

Family

Quiz: when is a family not a family?

Jane the Actuary

Family

Up next: "Child Care for All"

Jane the Actuary

TRENDING AT PATHEOS Catholic

Westminster Abbey-- Part One

In one sense walking into Westminster Abbey is like walking down the...

'Super Scam Me' Exposes AI Jon Bon Jovi...

Leslie Pickett believed she was in a relationship with Jon Bon Jovi....

The Brazilian Remake of Kendricks' 'Flywheel' Opens in...

“Flywheel,” the story that launched the Kendrick Brothers’ filmmaking career is getting...

The Dangers of Gradual Accommodation (Winking at Sin)

Recently, the “law of gradualness” resurfaced during the opening of a weeklong,...

The Iron Gates and the Lion of the...

  Yesterday, I didn't finish my report about, well, yesterday.  So I'll...

The Image: On the Horror of Capitalism and...

The Image Then went the Pharisees, and took counsel how they might...

view all Catholic blogs

Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube