Patheos

BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Patheos

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

janetheactuary

Trump, protests, etc. – whose fault is it?

Last updated on: March 12, 2016 at 2:34 pm   by Jane the Actuary

Trump, protests, etc. – whose fault is it? 2016-03-12T14:34:46-06:00 Jane the Actuary

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

In case you haven’t been following the news, yesterday Donald Trump cancelled his scheduled rally at the University of Illinois at Chicago stadium, shortly before he was scheduled to begin speaking, while the crowd waited for Trump to arrive, when it became clear that protesters were beginning to take actions to disrupt the event, from chanting anti-Trump slogans to rushing the stage.  Here’s a report from ABC News, with the basics of the story.  Here’s another report from AP, which cites a protester:

Chicago community activist Quo Vadis said hundreds of protesters had positioned themselves in groups around the arena, and they intended to demonstrate right after Trump took the stage.

Their goal, he said, was “for Donald to take the stage and to completely interrupt him. The plan is to shut Donald Trump all the way down.”

This was not a spontaneous protest, but planned well in advance.  And protests continued in the streets after the stadium was cleared.  The Gateway Pundit (not my favorite source, as he’s a Trump supporter) reports that some protesters even blocked an ambulance from passing.

There was similar disruption, and subsequent clashes in the streets following a rally earlier in the day in St. Louis, as reported by the L.A. Times.

Reports link this up to a general tenor of belligerence at Trump rallies.  Articles cite him as having said, of one protester, “I’d like to punch him in the face,” and, in another case, saying “I will pay any legal fees. I promise, I promise,” if someone acts on his statement, “If you see somebody getting ready to throw a tomato, knock the crap out of them, would you?”

And in the immediate aftermath of these events, each of Trump’s opponents said that Trump at least bore some of the blame for the events of Friday night.  Rubio said, “”You can’t just say whatever you want. These words have real consequences,” in a Kelly File interview, and Cruz went further, saying, just prior to the Lincoln Day Dinner (which I could have gone too — as it happens, it was the annual fundraiser dinner for my own local Republican organization, that I had looked at a couple weeks ago when I checked their website in one of my occasional “maybe I should get involved” moments):

“I think a campaign bears responsibility for creating an environment, when the candidate urges supporters to engage in physical violence–to punch people in the face. The predictable consequence of that is that it escalates and today is unlikely to be the last such instance.

But the trouble is this:  we’re not talking about a situation such as an outdoor protest march or rally with counter-protesters turns violent almost organically, or in which a mob incited by Trump moves on to attack others.

This seems like something altogether different, for protesters to move from simply registering their objection outside the rally, to entering in the rally in large numbers, and to move from protesting to, as the AP-cited activist says, intending to shut Trump “all the way down.”  When did this start happening?  It feels very new to me, the idea that you’d actually enter a venue such as this with the specific plan of protesting the event, and not even silently, but vocally and disruptively, throwing tomatoes or worse — and not just isolated hecklers, but routinely and coordinatedly, with the loud “F*** Trump” chants that have been reported.

And, indeed, with apologies for the lack of citations here, the general mood on twitter and in activists quoted in articles I read last night, or on the news, is that “free speech” is not just to the right to say what you will, but the right to shout down others.  And in that sense, this rally fits with a pattern of conservative speakers on university campuses being shouted down, or chased away by leftists, and of university administrations cancelling other such speakers to avoid this.

What’s more, these protesters are motivated by Trump’s anti-Mexican and anti-Muslim statements, and by a general opposition to his positions on immigration and other topics, and come out of the Occupy, MoveOn, and Black Lives Matter movements.  And perhaps if there were no Trump, they’d direct their attention to Cruz rallies similarly.

But at the same time, you can’t split out these chains of events from Trump’s statements along the way; everything’s intertwined.  Did Trump’s statements in the past motivate this crop of protesters?  No, not in isolation, though it perhaps contributed to their escalation from prior smaller protests.  But the very fact that Trump has said these things has meant that it’s not possible to know what would have happened had he not, and that, in itself, without trying to to untangle anything further, is the reason to stay away from such statements in the first place.

Finally, something fun:  as I was typing this up, I got a phone call:  a robocall push poll on this very topic! — asking if I agreed or disagreed that “America is better than this” and whether the events last night made more more or less likely to support Trump.  I googled “America is better than this” and the top hits say this was a Ted Cruz quote, hoping to use this incident to boost his chances on Tuesday.

Uncategorized

Cruz

protest violence

Trump

Previous Post



March 11, 2016

QUIZ: comparative higher eduction spending levels

Next Post



March 13, 2016 The Establishment in trouble (in Gemany, too)


Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Actuarial/Retirement Issues Politics Uncategorized

Select a Month September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 December 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 August 2021 June 2021 April 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013


Follow Us!

Follow Us on Facebook Follow Us on Twitter



TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who said, "To obey is better than sacrifice"?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Samuel David Isaiah Solomon

Related posts from Jane the Actuary

Family

The Mailbox Hoax

Jane the Actuary

Family

Can we -- should we -- pray for...

Jane the Actuary

Family

"SMART" goals, police reform, and protest marches

Jane the Actuary

Family

Protests, riots, justice - the Jane the Actuary...

Jane the Actuary

TRENDING AT PATHEOS Catholic

The Iron Gates and the Lion of the...

  Yesterday, I didn't finish my report about, well, yesterday.  So I'll...

Dolly Parton’s Last Song Wins Dove Award with...

Bluegrass band The Grascals, speaking on the red carpet at the 57th...

The Image: On the Horror of Capitalism and...

The Image Then went the Pharisees, and took counsel how they might...

Thoughts about Halloween

We are approaching the date of our new American national holiday: October...

Letters on Living the Faith by C.S. Lewis

Most of us met C.S. Lewis as a public intellectual. Mere Christianity....

When Halloween Unmasks Married Hearts

Written by Dr. David K. Ewen from Eternal Truth Bible College Behind...

view all Catholic blogs

Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube