The Establishment in trouble (in Gemany, too)

Last updated on: March 13, 2016 at 8:12 pm by Jane the Actuary

The Establishment in trouble (in Gemany, too) 2016-03-13T20:12:36-06:00 Jane the Actuary

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

In the first elections since last year’s migration crisis in Germany, three states voted, with mixed results.

According to Der Spiegel, In Rhineland-Palatinate (on the border with Belgium/Luxembourg/France, capital city Mainz, population 4 million), the CDU (Angela Merkel’s party) lost votes since the last election in 2011, to be sure, but not dramatically — from 35.2% to 31.8%. Their mainstream rival, the SPD, gained a smidge, from 35.7% to 36.2%. The main movement, surprisingly, was a drop in the Greens from 15.4% to 5.3%, in combination with the gain among the upstart AfD, Alternative fuer Deutschland (Altenative for Germany), which, having been founded in 2013 as a Euro-skeptic party and moved on to opposition to Merkel’s migration policies, contested in the election for the first time and took 12.6% of the vote.

Did voters really move from the Greens to AfD? It seems unlikely. Perhaps there were other reshufflings going on. And interestingly, voter turnout increased from 61% to 70%.

However, the SPD was in power already, having won a bare plurality in 2011, and, more importantly, having managed to have formed the majority coalition, in this case with the Greens. According to Deutsche Welle, they cannot do the same this year because of the electoral losses among the Greens, so they’ll most likely form a coalition with the Greens and the Liberals (a small, libertarian-ish, pro-business party which is often a coalition partner) – a so-called “Traffic Light Coalition” due to the colors of the parties.

In Baden-Württemberg, on the other hand, the rejection of the Establishment seems more obvious — the CDU dropped from 39% to 27%, and the SPD dropped from 23.1% to 12.7%. Who gained? The Greens — who were already a part of the governing coalition with the SPD, took the plurality of the vote, 30.3%, up from 24.2%, and AfD took 15.1%.

Again, because of the SPD’s losses, the Greens won’t be able to maintain their existing coalition, and will presumably also look to a Traffic Light coalition. But it’s already remarkable that the Green/SPD coalition existed in the first place, as that 2011 combination was the first time since postwar Germany came into being that the CDU didn’t control that historically conservative state. (The Reuters article linked to below attributes this to German nuclear power fears in the wake of the Fukushima nuclear disaster just prior to those elections.)

In Sachsen-Anhalt, in the former East Germany, the results are the most dramatic. The CDU again lost support, from 32.5% to 29.8%, but that’s not particularly noteworthy compared to other movements: the SPD dropped from 21.5% to 10.6%, the Left dropped from 23.7% to 16.3%, and AfD entered elections with a whopping 24.3% of the vote. Turnout was up here, too, from 51% to 61 or 64% (the two national broadcasters differ here).

So what do you make of this?

The consensus of the English-language reporting is that Merkel got shellacked, badly, due to her migrant policies. For instance, Reuters says, “Merkel’s party suffers drubbing in German state vote.” But it’s not that simple: looking simply at the changes from 2011, in Rhineland-Palatinate voters moved from the Greens to AFD. In Baden-Württemberg, both the Greens and AfD took votes from both CDU and SPD. And in Sachsen-Anhalt, AfD primarily drew voters from the SPD and the Left, demonstrating that extremists from the Left and the Right aren’t all that different, after all.

As the BBC observes, the politics of the migrant issue aren’t black and white:

The unprecedented success of the populist AfD shows just how vehemently some German voters disagree with Chancellor Merkel’s pro-refugee stance. Many are conservative voters disenchanted with her centrist policies, and swayed by the robust populist narrative offered by AfD.

So is this a blow to Mrs Merkel’s leadership? Not necessarily. It was also a historic victory for the Greens, who support the chancellor’s position on refugees.

And during the campaign in Baden-Wurttemberg and Saxony-Anhalt the CDU candidates saw their voters fall away as they sporadically tried to undermine the chancellor’s message and regain the populist ground from AfD.

Remarkably in those states it was the CDU’s left-wing opponents who backed Mrs Merkel’s refugee policies most consistently – and tonight reaped the rewards for it. These results are proof that Germany is becoming increasingly polarised between voters who passionately support Mrs Merkel’s pro-refugee stance and those angered by it.

Of course, the notion that the left-wing groups “reaped the rewards” is due to the fact that both the Left (Linke) and AfD are pariah parties; that is, it is deemed out of the question for the CDU to form a coalition with the AfD, under any circumstance, in the same way as, in the other direction, the Left (former communists) were deemed to extreme for the SPD to join together with. Which means that, even if the overall mood of the country shifted right, the electoral results won’t show it.

More than anything, it looks like the pro-immigrant policies of Chancellor Merkel, coming from a traditionally pro-business, socially-conservative (for Germany) political party, have shaken everything up, given that mainstream voters don’t have an obvious alternative to turn to. Perhaps there are significant realignments coming up, if German anger grows as the number of migrants does.

Or perhaps not — as the closing of borders in Macedonia and elsewhere in the East, and the hopes for a positive outcome to new agreements with Turkey, mean that future developments in the issue of mass migration are very much up in the air.

Uncategorized

Germany

Merkel

Previous Post

March 12, 2016

Trump, protests, etc. - whose fault is it?

Next Post

March 15, 2016 I voted! Did you?

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Actuarial/Retirement Issues Politics Uncategorized

Select a Month September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 December 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 August 2021 June 2021 April 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What was rolled away from Jesus’ tomb?

Select your answer to see how you score.

A stone A wall A door A fence