Patheos

BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Patheos

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

janetheactuary

My husband, gun owner . . .

Last updated on: March 26, 2016 at 3:55 pm   by Jane the Actuary

My husband, gun owner . . . 2016-03-26T15:55:55-06:00 Jane the Actuary

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

4ED6D118-7FCC-45A0-BB4C-9D02CCDE26DC

and Brady Center donor.

The gun itself?  Well, my husband did his 18 months’ service in the German military back when it was compulsory, in the Cold War days, and learned the basics of firearms there, even though he was happy to secure himself a desk job as soon after basic training as possible.  (And military service was a different experience for him than the typical American soldier — it was a 9 – 5 sort of experience, with weekends at home.)  Since then, he’s gone to the shooting range with my dad once or twice, has done some shooting with the Scouts at summer camp, and joined an out-of-town friend at a shooting range a couple times.

In the meantime — well, my own father has always owned guns.  Growing up, he went deer hunting (not especially secessfully), and rabbit hunting (we’d joke later than he was just going on a walk in the woods), and he said once that they kept the silver upstairs because, if a thief came, as long as he stayed downstairs he couldn’t do anything because it’d just be protecting property, but if said thief came upstairs, he could defend himself/us.  So it was a given that he had a handgun, but I can’t say I really gave it much thought.  More recently, when we’d come to visit, we’d check that any potentially-accessible guns had trigger locks.

Oh, and my son started this year with the local air rifle club, which may or may not have been a further catalyst.  At any rate, not long ago, my husband decided that he wanted to spend some time at the local shooting range, and, knowing that my father wasn’t going to be able to go to the shooting range himself any longer, he asked if he could “borrow” one of his pistols.  The “borrow” is in quotes because, in order to get the gun legally transferred from the Detroit area to the Chicago area, it’s necessary to do a full transfer of ownership, so, legally, my husband now owns the gun, but in some larger sense it’s still Dad’s.

So last Saturday it arrived at the gun shop/shooting range, and we stopped by to pick it up.  It was interesting to see what the place looked like.  As you enter, there’s a big sign that says, “concealed means concealed” and warns customers that they must keep and concealed-carry guns concealed, and any firearm that is visible will be interpreted as a threat and dealt with accordingly.  Guns that are being brought in for use in the shooting range are to be in cases and unloaded until entering the shooting range area.

They were rather busy, with a wait for the shooting range (with a display showing the wait time), and a sale going on.  And there were all types there — though certainly women were in the minority.  (Though, interestingly, there were proportionally more women among the employees than among the customers.)  Were the customers primarily hunters, or target shooters, or interested in self-defense?  I couldn’t say.

As for the gun itself?  Well, I mentioned that we checked on trigger locks on Dad’s guns.  We’re taking it a step further in our case:  the gun is stored onsite; the fee is minimal, it eliminates the need for my husband to take the gun along when he wants to go to the shooting range, and it completely removes the concern about having guns and teenagers in the house.  (Not that I have a concern about my boys, but you never know.)

But my husband’s German, and that certainly affects his perspective.  In this case, he doesn’t see it at all contradictory to be interested in target shooting and yet also believe that we should be more restrictive in firearm ownership, and more careful in firearm safety.  The requirements in Illinois that all firearm owners have a FOID card, and that transfers always include a licensed dealer make a great deal of sense to him, and he likes what the Brady Center has to say with respect to safe gun storage, warning gun owners that, even if they think every family member is responsible, there is still a risk that a teen could use the gun to commit suicide.  The even stricter restrictions in Germany, where only “true” hunters and sport shooters may own firearms, under strict conditions, such as active membership in a hunting or shooting sports club, and with further restrictions about type and number, are equally fine for him.

Me?  I’m in the middle.  Yes, it is clear that German has both a much tighter set of gun regulations (though, ironically, the favorite TV show genre is the “Krimi”, or crime show), and a much lower homicide rate.  But I don’t know that America can transform itself into a gun-restrictive country, when the the belief that any (law-abiding) individual who chooses to do so, has a right to defend himself, is so ingrained.  And, to be honest, I don’t just mean “ingrained in the American people” but also “ingrained in me.”

After all:  consider our different histories.  By the time guns came into mass production, Germany had long ago been settled, with even farmers living in hamlets rather than homesteads, and with hunting tightly controlled by the authorities/nobility (and not a lot of game in any case).  The same was, of course, not true in the United States.

So there it is.  Thoughts?

 

(Image: own photograph)

Uncategorized

guns

Previous Post



March 18, 2016

Coming to a store near you? - "Diaper Stamps"

Next Post



March 21, 2016 The New York Times' readers' peculiar understanding of contraception and conscientious objection


Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Actuarial/Retirement Issues Politics Uncategorized

Select a Month September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 December 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 August 2021 June 2021 April 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013


Follow Us!

Follow Us on Facebook Follow Us on Twitter



TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

I'm a number that marks the beast, feared by many throughout history. Triple digits, all the same. What number am I?

Select your answer to see how you score.

999 333 777 666

Related posts from Jane the Actuary

Family

Four Friday "gun" opinions

Jane the Actuary

Family

Ostracizing gun owners? Not so fast.

Jane the Actuary

Family

Is Stop-and-Frisk the cure to Chicago's gun violence?

Jane the Actuary

Family

The Second Amendment, Heller, and "Gun Control Extremism,"...

Jane the Actuary

TRENDING AT PATHEOS Catholic

When Halloween Unmasks Married Hearts

Written by Dr. David K. Ewen from Eternal Truth Bible College Behind...

Jesus Was Not an Aristotelian

Aristotle. He’s been called the father of logic, the father of the...

Methodist Central Hall and Westminster Abbey

Situated on the same square is Methodist Central Hall and Westminster Abbey. ...

57th Dove Awards Honor Dolly Parton, Crown New...

On gospel music’s biggest night, the 57th annual GMA Dove Awards honored...

The First Eucharistic Controversy: Christ’s Real Presence

For Catholics, the Eucharist is the source and summit of the Christian...

What a Stop Sign Can Teach Us About...

How to Make a Decision When You Can't Hear God Main point:...

view all Catholic blogs

Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube