Who rewrote the Corporal Works of Mercy?

Last updated on: February 29, 2016 at 9:37 am by Jane the Actuary

Who rewrote the Corporal Works of Mercy? 2016-02-29T09:37:48-06:00 Jane the Actuary

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Here’s the context:

Back in November, I wrote a post on the Works of Mercy, and how, in the year 2015 (because that was last year), it seemed that to a large degree the traditional Works have been supplemented, if not replaced, by Work of Mercy #8, “just write the d*** check already!” Especially for those of us who don’t earn a fixed amount of money but have some control over our work hours, we can generally do more good, measured in some objective manner, by working more hours and donating the earnings to a charity, than doing direct Works of Mercy actions. And this includes those who work part-time and have choice in how many hours to work per week, those who have the opportunity to accept or decline overtime (coming soon: overtime eligibility for everyone earning under $50K), those who can make a longer-term decision to work long hours in a salaried context, to earn that year-end bonus or speed the promotion, and people approaching retirement age deciding when to hang up their hat. If I’m retirement age, and contemplating quitting my job in order to volunteer somewhere, in most cases, unless I have specific skills that are transferable to the program in question, I can do more good by staying put and donating the funds. To be sure, if I can put specific skills to use, for example, by counseling women in crisis pregnancies, or managing the operation of a charity, that’s great, but the trade-off of leaving a skilled job for an unskilled charitible service like receiving donations at a food pantry or acting as a sales clerk at the local thrift store, along high schoolers earning their service hours, is not as clear, and spending your time making Linus Project blankets* or Little Dresses for Africa, even less so. What’s more, the practice of buying items to donate (whether that’s food to a food pantry, or a winter coats for a coat drive) generally has less ultimate benefit than donating the cash directly to an organization that can buy in bulk, and knows the specific needs of individual recipients. (A closet clean-out is a separate issue entirely, since that’s more about being responsible, rather than wasteful, with your possessions.)

(* Incidentally, the advent of fleece for no-sew blankets has radically changed the way Linus Project projects function — rather than actually sewing something hand-made, it seems to now be about cutting squares of fleece to size. I have a really hard time imagining that there’s value in this.)

One might add more Works of Mercy to the list, too. Teach the uneducated. Provide enrichment and encouragement to those in need of these. Mentor to break the cycle of poverty (which didn’t exist in the time of Christ as we know it now), rather than just alleviate material needs. (Are these included in the Spiritual Works of Mercy? I thought the latter are solely about, well, spiritual things — that is, instruction in religion rather than practical knowledge — but I’m willing to be corrected.) And it’s all muddled by Work of Mercy #???, “vote properly” — when virtually all of the poverty-alleviation game is done via government spending.

Now, I didn’t really find many takers in the comments — and that’s OK, as I really wanted to raise this for discussion, and there’s no “right” answer one way or the other. It’s a matter of degrees — and yes, both my husband and I volunteer with our church’s PADS group (the rotating homeless shelter) — he does the 3 – 7 shift, and I’m on a cooking team. Besides which, most of us have “extra” time, even after work and family obligations are dealt with, where we’re not realistically going to work more hours, but we can make the decision to watch TV, pursue a hobby, or do some kind of volunteer activity (though volunteer activities that can be done after the kids are in bed, or along with the kids, are limited in number).

What I did hear, there and elsewhere, was the idea that, regardless of what’s more effective, there’s something more spiritually beneficial and meritorious in doing something more direct than writing a check, even if there’s some “waste” to it.

But, having said all that, I was taken by surprise at the list of the Works of Mercy in yesterday’s bulletin at church, in an article about the Year of Mercy. Because Work #7 was, in fact, “give alms to the poor”!

I counted, and recounted. What was missing? Later on, I looked online: there it was, on the USCCB website,

GIVE ALMS TO THE POOR
Donate money to organizations that have the ability to provide support and services for those in need. Do research and find organizations that put people in need first, rather than profit.

And, in order to keep the list to seven, they’d removed “clothe the naked.” Why this one? I don’t know, especially since their suggestions for “give drink to the thirst” are pretty weak, suggesting a group of children donate water bottles to a homeless shelter for families, for instance. I would have thought that you’d combine “food” and “drink” into one, rather than removing a WoM entirely.

Now, that’s just the U.S. bishops talking; everywhere elsee online the Works are still the traditional seven. Perhaps that’s even just a single staffer, without review or editing from anyone higher-up. But it feels like a bit of cheating to simply swap out one for another, rather than acknowledging the complexity of the issue.

Image:
David Teniers the Younger (1610–1690), The Works of Mercy, from Wikimedia Commons, https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:David_Teniers_(II)_-_The_Works_of_Mercy_-_WGA22084.jpg

Uncategorized

Works of Mercy

Year of Mercy

Previous Post

February 28, 2016

Trumpism and, is expanded voter turnout really such a good idea?

Next Post

February 29, 2016 So, Cruz? (Because it's looking pretty desparate)

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Actuarial/Retirement Issues Politics Uncategorized

Select a Month September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 December 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 August 2021 June 2021 April 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What does "Immanuel" mean, as in Isaiah's prophecy?

Select your answer to see how you score.

God reigns God will save God with us Prince of peace