Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Catholic
Politics and Religion
The Pope visited the Mexico/US border and . . . (with bonus comments on the plane presser)

The Pope visited the Mexico/US border and . . . (with bonus comments on the plane presser)

Last updated on: February 18, 2016 at 6:09 pm by Jane the Actuary

The Pope visited the Mexico/US border and . . . (with bonus comments on the plane presser) 2016-02-18T18:09:31-06:00 Jane the Actuary

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

As you likely know, the Pope held a mass in Juarez, Mexico, not far from the border with the U.S., yesterday. What did he say?

Let’s start with the idea that you could kinda sorta read the Pope’s statements at the border two ways:

The first, the way everyone wants to interpret it, is a call for open borders, and for the US to let migrants cross easily, to take them in, and qualify them for residency based on claims of persecution, or due to violence in their home countries, or deep poverty.

The second, is a call for the home countries to get their acts together, e.g., for the Mexican government to put an end to corruption, for the wealthy to be converted to caring about the poor, etc. – in which case, the border symbolizes the desperation of these people and the failures of their home countries.

What exactly did he say?

I don’t know. Or that is, his homily, the full text of which is found here, is open to interpretation. Here are his most specific paragraphs:

Here in Ciudad Juárez, as in other border areas, there are thousands of immigrants from Central America and other countries, not forgetting the many Mexicans who also seek to pass over “to the other side”. Each step, a journey laden with grave injustices: the enslaved, the imprisoned and extorted; so many of these brothers and sisters of ours are the consequence of a trade in human beings.

We cannot deny the humanitarian crisis which in recent years has meant migration for thousands of people, whether by train or highway or on foot, crossing hundreds of kilometres through mountains, deserts and inhospitable zones. The human tragedy that is forced migration is a global phenomenon today. This crisis which can be measured in numbers and statistics, we want instead to measure with names, stories, families. They are the brothers and sisters of those expelled by poverty and violence, by drug trafficking and criminal organizations. Being faced with so many legal vacuums, they get caught up in a web that ensnares and always destroys the poorest. Not only do they suffer poverty but they must also endure these forms of violence. Injustice is radicalized in the young; they are “cannon fodder”, persecuted and threatened when they try to flee the spiral of violence and the hell of drugs, not to mention the tragic predicament of the many women whose lives have been unjustly taken.

“Forced migration” certainly seems to place the blame on the home countries, where the “poverty and violence, . . . drug trafficking and criminal organizations” are found. And he decries the injustices in the journey itself as well.

But this is a homily — and as such, there’s a scripture text, in this case, the story of Jonah, calling the Ninevites to repentance, about which he says,

Let us together ask our God for the gift of conversion, the gift of tears, let us ask him to give us open hearts like the Ninevites, open to his call heard in the suffering faces of countless men and women. No more death! No more exploitation! There is still time to change, there is still a way out and a chance, time to implore the mercy of God.

He is maddenly non-specific. By “death” does he mean deaths in home countries causing people to flee? Or deaths at the border — and, if the latter, how does he want this to end? By ending the poverty causing people to leave? Or by the U.S. opening its border to all? And what is the “exploitation” he’s thinking of? Home-country exploitation? Or the exploitation of smugglers, which would end, again, if borders were opened?

And who’s the “us” who should be converted and change our ways in order to end this? One presumes his audience didn’t think of themselves as having anything to repent of — was he calling them to be Jonahs and preach repentance to others?

Presumably he was intentionally non-specific, so that one set of hearers could hear, by the symbolism of the location, a call for open borders, without opening himself up to criticism that he’s interfering in the United States’ right to control its borders. But it’s maddening.

Bonus comments on the Pope’s in-flight press conference: did the Pope approve of contraception?

The official Vatican news agency says this:

Asked about responses to the Zika virus which is causing birth defects, especially across Latin America, the Pope stressed that abortion is a crime which can never be justified as a lesser evil and which goes against the Hippocratic oath that doctors must take. Using contraceptives to avoid pregnancy can be acceptable in difficult situations, he said, noting that Pope Paul VI authorized nuns in Africa to do the same half a century ago when they were threatened with rape.

Now, I’m surprised that there isn’t a transcript as NBC reports this in more detail:

Pope Francis on Thursday suggested using artificial contraception in countries afflicted with the Zika virus would be OK for women worried with how the disease is linked to rare birth defects.

Calling it a “lesser of two evils,” Francis indicated that choosing to avoid pregnancy altogether would be the better alternative to abortion.

Abortion “is an evil in and of itself, but it is not a religious evil at its root, no? It’s a human evil,” he told reporters en route to Rome following his six-day visit to Catholic-heavy Latin America, which is grappling with a Zika outbreak.

“On the other hand, avoiding pregnancy is not an absolute evil,” he continued. “In certain cases, as in this one (Zika), such as the one I mentioned of Blessed Paul VI, it was clear.”

Now, the case of Paul VI he’s referring to is a situation in Belgian Congo in the 1960s, when nuns at high risk of rape were permitted to use contraceptive pills. As the Catholic News Agency explains, this is not really an exception; the Church moral teaching on contraception says that a couple engaging in sexual intercourse must be open to life, but says nothing about what’s morally right or wrong in the case of a woman being assaulted. This same CNA article suggests that maybe the Pope was referring to natural family planning, but I think that’s a bit optimistic, since the reference to Paul VI and the Congolese nuns wouldn’t make sense in that case — no one needs a special exception in order to practice natural family planning. At the same time, if all he meant to say was that if any given woman fully intends to abort a baby in the case of a Zika infection, it would be less sinful for her to use contraception, then, again, the reference to the nuns wouldn’t make sense. Which certainly seems to suggest that his thought was that the risk of microcephaly was a circumstance that would make using contraception a moral choice — but this could hardly be stated in isolation, as, to be consistent, this would open up a blanket approval for any cases in which, were a woman to conceive, her child would be at risk of being disabled, either because the woman and her husband are carriers for some genetic disorder, or because of age and the heightened risk of Down syndrome, or other reasons.

I know my readers think this is all pretty silly, so there’s not too much value in delving into this. Far better to talk about whether the Pope erred in saying that “a person who thinks only of building walls anywhere – rather than building bridges – is not a Christian”. (This was a direct quote in the Vatican account as well as elsewhere.) Now, this statement is a nuisance because he’s combining literal walls and metaphorical bridges in the same sentence, but it also was a surprise to me that the Pope would express such a sentiment, which I associated more with American Protestants, who use Christian as a synonym for “good” or “moral” — “that’s not a very Christian thing to do.” And, given the whole Year of Mercy bit, to say that, if one doesn’t have the right mindset on immigration, one is excluded from salvation, seems a bit excessive.

But this is a plane press conference. No doubt we’ll be hearing all about how the Pope didn’t really mean what people are saying he meant soon enough!

Uncategorized

illegal immigrants

Pope Francis

Previous Post

February 18, 2016

Marco needs a Beer Summit

Next Post

February 19, 2016 Recommended reading: Trump, Fishtown, and Belmont

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Actuarial/Retirement Issues Politics Uncategorized

Select a Month September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 December 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 August 2021 June 2021 April 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who was Jeremiah's faithful secretary and scribe?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Zephaniah Eliakim Micah Baruch