Rubio needs a converstion story

Last updated on: February 26, 2016 at 4:31 pm by Jane the Actuary

Rubio needs a converstion story 2016-02-26T16:31:55-06:00 Jane the Actuary

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

So, look, I know you’re all getting tired of my blog posts on Rubio, but please put up with one more, before I move on to New and Exciting Non-Election Blog Content, coming your way shortly. (Though this weekend is pretty full with family commitments.)

Here’s the trouble: if you look at current immigration policy positions — without evaluating the credibility of the candidates espousing them — I line up with Rubio’s enforcement-first, legalization-second approach, at least more in broad outlines, to a greater degree than any of the other candidates. Cruz’s “deport them all, period” is preposterous, and Trump’s “deport ’em all and let the good ones come back” is even more foolish (why expend all that energy only to allow them back in afterwards?). Kasich keeps suggesting that he wants a guest worker program on top of amnesty. For good measure, Sanders is all about amnesty, and immigration expansion, and only reluctantly concedes any sort of enforcement at all. To be honest, I haven’t looked at Clinton, but I believe she’s pretty much identical to Sanders on this point.

Why am I OK with a (limited) legalization program?

Like it or not, politicians have spent so many years announcing that illegals were welcome as long as they didn’t cause trouble (“jobs Americans won’t do”), and have allowed them to establish lives here by their refusal to enforce immigration laws, so that it really would be unjust to now implement a deportation program. Or, rather, any such deportation program should not include in its scope those who have been here for a significant number of years, have learned English, and have become part of the community. The laborer who arrived recently, knows no English, lives in a flophouse, and sends wages back to family back home, has no grounds for claiming that it’s unjust to send him back.

But this is again an issue of trust, of credibility. Questions about Rubio’s authenticity on this matter are hard to set aside when his entire narrative for why he’s come around to an enforcement-first approach are that “it’s what the American people want”, and when he’s squirrely about the exact nature of his subsequent-to-enforcement legalization program, and when he’s pretty much said that the enforcement won’t touch existing illegals, only new arrivals.

Is Donald Trump pro-life? Beats me. But he at least took the trouble to come up with a conversion story. As I recall, it has something to do with someone he knew, who had what pro-life folk call a “crisis pregnancy,” but whose child turned out to be very successful. Not the most inspiring story, but he’s got a narrative.

Rubio needs a converstion story on immigration, a way to communicate to voters that enforcement-first is something he genuinely believes in, rather than something he reluctantly accepts as politically expedient. He can use the age-old device of telling folksy stories of people he supposedly “met on the campaign trail,” anecdotes about exactly those workers who were turned down at Trump’s guest-worker-using hotel, for instance, or former poultry-processing workers who were displaced by immigrants working for lower wages, or the former Disney worker who testified before Congress about training his replacement. He can use the fact that even the new arrivals from Central America are not being sent back, and that even the plans to send a hundred-odd back produced protests, as the last straw that made him realize that it’s not about “the American people” not trusting enforcement but the government not deserving that trust. I don’t really care exactly what he says, but he has to say something.

Would that be enough? God only knows. Watching Trump at the debate yesterday, even having read repeatedly explanations for his success, it still astonishes me that he has supporters, when he makes such preposterous claims. He’s going to solve the budget deficit by cutting “waste, fraud, and abuse.” He’s going to solve healthcare exclusively by enabling cross-state insurance purchases, and “taking care” of those who would otherwise “die in the streets.” By sheer force of will, he’ll bring back jobs to the U.S. Support him and “America is going to start winning again, and it’ll be great.” Yes, I know that there are people who support him just to show their emnity to The Establishment, but, Good Lord, even Cruz is a better choice if you hate The Establishment, isn’t he?

Previous Post

February 25, 2016

Time for a debate!

Next Post

February 28, 2016 Trumpism and, is expanded voter turnout really such a good idea?

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Actuarial/Retirement Issues Politics Uncategorized

Select a Month September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 December 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 August 2021 June 2021 April 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What mountain did Moses receive the Ten Commandments on?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Mount Carmel Mount Sinai Mount Zion Mount Ararat