Marco needs a Beer Summit

Last updated on: February 18, 2016 at 9:21 am by Jane the Actuary

Marco needs a Beer Summit 2016-02-18T09:21:15-06:00 Jane the Actuary

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

That is, with bloggers like Mickey Kaus and Ace at Ace of Spades HQ, and Mark Krikorian at the Center for Immigration Studies, and maybe a few others.

The more I see of Rubio, and of the politics of this election season, the more I believe that it is the single issue of immigration that is preventing Rubio from succeeding in the polls, and ultimately in the primaries. He has simply not made a credible case that he will hold to his word and fully implement enforcement before signing off on a legalization program.

Why?

Because it is clear that what he personally wants is the opposite, an immediate legalization program followed by enforcement measures. His insistent repeating of the statement that he’s changed his mind because Americans don’t believe the government would get the job done on law enforcement is telling, and worrisome, because he’s leaving himself a way out: if Congress sends him a legalization program law, he can simply declare that, lo and behold, Congress surely is representing the will of the people, and get out his signing pen. Would Congress do this? Ryan supports it, after all. Would there be hell to pay from an angry electorate? Maybe, but there have been plenty of cases where that hasn’t stopped those in power, convinced that they know better and that the electorate will forget by the time the next election comes.

And it would have been so easy for Rubio to have chosen different words: not, for example, “Americans don’t believe” but “I have come to recognize that our government, as an institution, isn’t trustworthy.”

What’s more, he doesn’t, anywhere in his stump speech, show any recognition of why Americans oppose legalization (or, rather, accept it only in a case where it’s a certainty that it’s a true one-time event and accompanied by shutting down future illegal immigration) and high levels of immigration. He doesn’t show any comprehension of the worries that working class Americans have gotten hammered by the perfect storm of globalization, automation, and an influx of low-skilled workers underbidding them for unskilled work, and that their wages have stagnated. He doesn’t acknowledge the anger that the H1-B program is being abused and hurting workers who train their replacements, that the tech giants proposing higher immigration levels are doing so to hold down wages, not due to labor shortages.

Rubio has also said that, during this period of enforcement implementation, he has no intention of deporting anyone but hardened criminals, which makes the particulars of his program hard to tease out. Does he agree with those who object to workplace enforcement because it deprives future legalize-ees of the ability to earn a wage? Would his interim policies amount to de facto immediate legalization?

So far as I can tell, his strategy is (a) to repeat his current stump speech and hope that enough voters don’t know his past to question his credibility, and (b) to write off voters who oppose him on immigration. Either that, or he just doesn’t get it, just doesn’t understand how much of a difference it makes.

Which is why he needs to take two actions:

first, the “Beer Summit” – by which I don’t mean a photo-op with these anti-legalization leaders, but a true meeting with them to show a real willingness to understand their concerns rather than a petulant demand that others believe him rather like the person who insists, “I said I was sorry and that should be enough for you to like me now.”

and, second, some way to make a commitment more binding, or a new approach that communicates more than just “believe me that I’m on your side now.” What would that be? I’ve suggested in the past that Americans could be given standing to sue employers who hire illegals, using the model of ADA enforcement. I also suggested, more outlandishly, to be sure, that Rubio make a binding commitment to these anti-legalization leaders, something that creates personal hardship, legally-enforceable, even. A pledge that if he violates his word and signs a bill that anti-legalizationists oppose, he will sign over his future personal speech-making wealth, to organizations helping displaced workers.

Now, I don’t imagine this is going to happen, but Rubio can’t make this issue go away by ignoring it and repeating his stump speech lines.

Uncategorized

illegal immigrants

Rubio

Previous Post

February 17, 2016

Obama's diagnosis and prescription for polarization - eh, not so impressed

Next Post

February 18, 2016 The Pope visited the Mexico/US border and . . . (with bonus comments on the plane presser)

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Actuarial/Retirement Issues Politics Uncategorized

Select a Month September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 December 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 August 2021 June 2021 April 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What physical affliction did Job suffer?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Broken bones Painful boils Blindness Leprosy