Say it ain’t so, Rubio!

Last updated on: January 19, 2016 at 8:21 pm by Jane the Actuary

Say it ain’t so, Rubio! 2016-01-19T20:21:09-06:00 Jane the Actuary

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Back in September, I made the prediction that, when voters lose their infatuation with Trump, and with Carson, it’d be Rubio left standing. Little did I imagine that it’d be Cruz climbing in the polls, and Rubio stagnating, but, if you look at RCP’s latest polling averages, Rubio peaked on December 8th with 15%, and has dropped since then, to 11%. And Cruz (Cruz! “abolish the fed” Cruz!) was tied with Rubio then, and has been growing his lead since then, to 19%. In Iowa, he’s tied with Trump, after having briefly been leading. In New Hampshire, he’s still right there in the pack with the others, but, well, that’s New Hampshire. They were the ones that gave McCain his boost, and they’ve got Kasich polling well.

So what happened to Rubio?

Perhaps many things happened to him, but, as far as I’m concerned, I find it disturbing that he can’t tell a straight story on immigration. Consider just the last couple days:

On Thursday, in the debate, he’s got a new claim, that his opinion on legalization changed because of national security fears, and the need to vet immigrants properly. It was horrifying to watch as it took a question about increases in green cards and just inserted “Syria! Terrorism!” as if the two had anything to do with each other. It felt as if he was grasping at straws.

There were also scuffles with Cruz about immigration, and as a result, he released an ad, as reported at hotair.com, in which he pledged “no amnesty.”

But on Sunday, on Meet the Press, as reported by Politico, the Daily Caller, etc. he asserted that he still intends to allow illegal immigrants to stay, so long as they haven’t committed non-immigration-related felonies (that is, identity theft is OK). Mikey Kaus is predictably unwilling to give him a pass, and, let’s face it, as much as Rubio is trying to convince voters that Cruz’s record is no better than his, I have to suspect that a large part of the reason why voters aren’t warming to him is that they think he’s just peddling snake oil here, and it impacts their entire opinion of him as a candidate.

After all, to say “no amnesty” and “yes, legalization” only makes sense if you adopt that legalese that says “I define amnesty as a completely free pass for everyone, so if I attach any conditions (no matter how small) to my proposal, I deem it non-amensty.” And this sort of weaseling around the issue hardly endears one to voters.

Rubio’s had a long time to evaluate the issue, and come up with a credible explanation for his “conversion” away from legalization. It wouldn’t have been that hard. Just say, “because of my immigrant background, I had a hard time believing that immigration could ever be anything but positive, but now I understand that it helps the wealthy but hurts the poor.” I even wrote up the text for him, back in November. But not only did he not take my advice (shocking, I know!), he’s offered a series of weak explanations since then, largely centered around the fact that he now knows we have to implement enforcement first, because that’s the only thing that’ll work politically — which is not a particularly principled statement, and suggests that, if Congress sent a bill to his desk with a legalization program, he’d say, “hey, I was wrong; it is politically possible to have legalization first,” and get out his pen.

(It reminds me of HRC’s position on single-payer healthcare at yesterday’s debate: “I oppose single-payer just because it’s not possible to get the votes for it.”)

What’s more, the key type of enforecment we need is not a wall to keep illegal immigrants out, or better visa-tracking to count the number of visa overstayers, but work enforcement — e-verify. And if he’s planning on letting pretty much everyone stay, then he simply can’t go along with a mandatory e-verify program without some kind of prior legalization, whether it’s called such, or given the label of “temporary,” because otherwise legalization-eligible individuals will be unable to work.

And the exact particulars of his plans — especially at what point he plans to implement legalization — have left immigration activists constantly parsing he words, because he just doesn’t provide specifics.

I’ll offer again my no-fail illegal immigration solution from November (bottom line: give workers standing to sue), but I suspect it’s too late for Rubio. After all, if voters don’t trust him on immigration, then they just don’t trust him. And if he’s not smart enough to give a satistfactory, believable answer on the topic, he’s just not smart enough, period.

ADDED:

Yes, I know other candidates are either pro-amnesty (Bush) or are furiously denying their prior support (Cruz, reportedly). But what gets me about Rubio is how incompetently he’s managing his flip-flop.

Uncategorized

illegal immigrants

Rubio

Previous Post

January 17, 2016

Who wants to live-blog the debate?

Next Post

January 19, 2016 The Flint Water Crisis

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Actuarial/Retirement Issues Politics Uncategorized

Select a Month September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 December 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 August 2021 June 2021 April 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What was the name of the blind beggar Jesus healed near Jericho?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Matthias Bartimaeus Cornelius Simon