Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Catholic
Politics and Religion
There are two kinds of Islam (and further thoughts)

There are two kinds of Islam (and further thoughts)

Last updated on: January 16, 2016 at 5:25 pm by Jane the Actuary

There are two kinds of Islam (and further thoughts) 2016-01-16T17:25:41-06:00 Jane the Actuary

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

and, no, I don’t mean Sunni vs. Shi’a.

I mean an Islam of “core principles” and an Islam of legal traditions.

This is emerging as the core difference in what I’ve been reading, both over the last week and in the past. (I would have checked out A Battle for the Soul of Islam, by Zuhdi Jasser, to re-read as well, but it was checked out at my local library. It fits in with Ali-Karamali and Manji, though.)

You might also label these groups “contextualists” vs. “transmissionists”; the former emphasize interpreting in context, based on core principles; the latter emphasize interpreting the way teachings have been transmitted down the generations.

And there’s not a hard-and-fast line between the two: contextualists look to traditional interpretations as much as possible, and trasmissionists, so far as I understand, use their judgement when there are multiple schools of thought on a matter, though they may not acknowledge that that’s what they’re doing.

But attitudes toward women’s headcovering point to this difference. Contextualists say that Muslims should look beyond legal traditions as they’ve arisen over the years, to Muhammad’s fundamental message of equality of men and women, to see that the right way to interpret conflicting traditions is in favor of equality, and, hence, uncovered heads, though with acceptance of those who choose otherwise. Transmissionists say that the long chain of interpretation requires women to cover their heads, so that’s that.

Having said that, both these approaches are “real Islam.”

The tolerant Islam that Ali-K. describes, is “real Islam,” yes, but the intolerant, combative Islam that Manji describes (and opposes) is also Islam. I’ve said this previously, and I’ll harp on it again. It is extremely important to recognize that there are two Islams (or more than two, if you split the transmissionists into Good Guys and Bad Guys), in order to make any headway in our thinking about the subject.

Is this Transmitted Islam necessarily extremist? No, but I’d guess that young people who grow up in this environment are at risk of moving on to extremism because their understanding of Islam is that it’s all about listening to experts, and they come to believe that ISIS recruiters are more authoritative than the religious leaders they grew up with. And in many cases, these leaders are already less moderate than they claim to be, making statements such as “I’m moderate, but Charlie Hebdo shouldn’t have published those cartoons,” or “I oppose violence, but the terrorists have valid complaints.”

Now, so far as I can tell, everyone in the ongoing debates about extremism, mainstreamism, and reform, have resisted applying labels, or differentiating between “types of Islam.” Each side says that they are “true Muslims” and the other side(s) is/are not.

But this is getting us, and them, nowhere. The fundamental starting point has to be to say, “anyone who accepts Muhammad as the final prophet of God, who revealed the word and will of God, is a Muslim” and work from there.

Instead we’re stuck with discussions that just replay the No True Scotsman claim over and over.

Ali-Karamali in her book, and others like her, take the position that the Bad Things that Muslims do have nothing to do with Islam; even if ISIS, for instance, thinks of themselves as Islamic, they’re really motivated by either a false understanding of Islam, or by political reasons that have nothing, really, to do with religion at all. Likewise, honor killings, forced veiling of women, and the like are the result of tribal backwardness by people who just happen to be Muslim.

It’s an “am I my brother’s keeper?” sort of attitude.

And it’s wrong not just because it generates a persecution mindset among Muslims in America, but because the contextualizing Muslims, the “core principles” Muslims, are the only ones who can reach out to their fellow believers and call them to their path. The world needs them to do this.

What’s more, they need to do this not just via blog posts, or youtube videos, or lectures or op-ed pieces, but through community.

When the Jews of 18th century Germany decided they needed to create a new kind of Judaism, they didn’t just decide, on their own, to stop keeping kosher at home. They created communities of like-minded believers.

So far as I can tell, that’s what’s missing among Islamic reformers.

Ali-K. writes about coming to the belief that there’s nothing wrong with men and women worshiping together, rather than the women being relegated to a basement with a scratchy loudspeaker. But she continues to worship in a community in which this is exactly what she experiences.

Manji writes about travelling across the country and, indeed, across the world to spread her message of reform, and of facebook correspondence with individuals who would like to escape the religious environment they feel trapped in. But at home, her mother still worships in a mosque where the imam calls her daughter a heretic, and Manji herself doesn’t appear to worship anywhere at all.

Reform cannot come from websites, or twitter campaigns, or foundations. Reform can only happen in community.

Perhaps it begins with a small group, even a group whose members drive long distances to pray together. But that provides an opportunity for others to join and grow the community, and provides an identity and a structure that, ultimately, might mean an existing community could join together, perhaps based on a shared “statement of beliefs.” And, as a community, the members can reach out to others, both Muslims and the wider society. Plus, Christians and Jews who wish to reach out themselves, now have a better means of showing their support for their Muslim neighbors than simply calling up the largest local mosque, regardless of their beliefs, and taking it on faith that the imam who has assured them “I am a moderate,” truly is.

Uncategorized

Islam

Previous Post

December 23, 2015

From the library: Mecca and Main Street; Muslim Life in America after 9/11, by Geneive Abdo

Next Post

December 25, 2015 Merry Christmas to my readers

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Actuarial/Retirement Issues Politics Uncategorized

Select a Month September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 December 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 August 2021 June 2021 April 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who was Jeremiah's faithful secretary and scribe?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Zephaniah Eliakim Micah Baruch