Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Catholic
Politics and Religion
From the library: The Muslim Next Door by Sumbul Ali-Karamali

From the library: The Muslim Next Door by Sumbul Ali-Karamali

Last updated on: December 20, 2015 at 7:15 am by Jane the Actuary

From the library: The Muslim Next Door by Sumbul Ali-Karamali 2015-12-19T22:17:22-06:00 Jane the Actuary

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Subtitled The Qur’an, the Media, and that Veil Thing.

The front cover alone lets you know what to expect: a smiling woman, with nothing that really marks her as “other” — no headscarf, wearing Western clothing, a touch of make-up and a contemporary hairstyle. She doesn’t even really look like the daughter of Indian immigrants that she is, and the message that this picture communicates is “we Muslims could just as well be your next-door neighbors and we’d fit right in.”

And her approach to Islam? It’s, well, different. Never mind all this business about hijab, and jihad, and the Sword Verses, and polygamy. Her bottom line is this: anything in the Qur’an that is inspiring, and preaches justice, equality, tolerance, and mercy, is to be taken at face value and good for all time. Anything that suggests otherwise must be understood in context, in ways that transform the verse or the teaching.

As I’ve done on other occasions, I’m going to just present her words without (much) commentary, to start with anyway. Here are my notes as I read through the book:

On atonement:

Jesus did not die for the sins of humanity or atone for anyone else’s sins. In Islam, only the sinner can atone for his or her own sins. (p. 41)

On heaven:

The Qur’an’s description of heaven is not an exclusively spiritual, sober one. It contains many earthly pleasures, such as beautiful gardens, fruits and water more pure than imaginable, and even immortal dark-eyed beings or houri to serve these things. . . . the Qur’an was addressing an ancient, patriarchal, polygynous society and conveying concepts in the terms people (men, actually) nearly fourteen centuries ago would have understood. (p. 44)

On war:

But Muhammad never entered into a war that was not defensive and never used military operations if he could use diplomacy instead. (p. 55)

On justice:

Nothing was more important to Muhammad than social justice. The Qur’an and the recorded quotations of the Prophet make this absolutely clear. He wanted to change the entire social and moral fabric of Arabia, but he knew that to turn the world of his fellow Arabs upside down would backfire and do no good at all.

Therefore, Islam sometimes does not prohibit outright undesirable, pre-Islamic practices. Rather, it retains them but fences safeguards around them and strongly encourages a gradual progression toward their elimination. (p. 57)

and on war again:

Those verses that do sanction fighting do so in the context of a just war and against the backdrop of the verses that command Muslims to practice tolerance, never aggress, make peace when the other side desires it, and never harm noncombatants (p. 76)

Taking Qur’anic verses in context:

It is difficult to know whether verses are metaphorical or symbolic. Still other verses are superseded by later Qur’anic verses or by hadith (sayings of the Prophet). Sometimes, a Qur’anic verse carves out an exception to a rule in another verse. (p. 80)

All this goes to show that quoting the Qur’an out of context and without the interpretive literature is misleading. The actual meaning may be completely unrelated to what it seems to mean. Considering the idiosyncrasies of 1,300-year-old Arabic, the obscure historical figures and events to Qur’an refers to without explaining, the enormous difficulties of translation, and the historical context of the verses, it should be obvious why someone knowing nothing about Islam might come up with inaccurate conceptions of what the Qur’an means. . . . Even all Muslims do not agree on what each verse of the Qur’an means. No particular meaning is absolute. (p. 81)

On heaven, again,

A primary reason my husband is Muslim is because it is established in Islam that anyone, Muslim or otherwise, may go to heaven. . . . in Islam, if you do good deeds, you go to heaven. (p. 82)

Regarding Shia vs. Sunni Muslims, she explains the historical context but says that, among Muslims, these are considered to be minor differences among Muslims.

Whoops, where’d that come from? Out of nowhere, in talking about how the West thinks that the Saudi and Taliban extremism is the majority belief because it’s most visible:

Similarly, the September 11th attacks (whoever engineered them) were coordinated so that all television cameras would be trained securely on the destruction of the first tower when the second plane crashed. (p. 98).

“Whoever engineered them”? Is she, for all her moderation, still a 9/11 truther, or of the opinion that Muslims were framed?

On women leading prayer, and on decision-making: the rationale for separating men and women during prayer was modesty, because everyone’s bending over in close quarters, but there are some voices in favor of changes.

As a Muslim, I am entitled to listen to the various opinions of the Islamic authorities, pray for guidance, and choose the view my conscience tells me is right. My view — which is one of several valid Islamic viewpoints on this issue — is that we should follow the Prophet’s example, as well as the view of early and modern jurists, to allow learned women (or learned men) to lead the prayer. I do not think we should consider men to be so weak that they could not concentrate on God with a woman leading the prayer. . . . I would love to be able to pray together with my husband and children, all standing together, rather than in separate rooms or even separate groups. (p. 104)

On immutability — or mutability — of Islamic law/teaching:

After the twelfth century, the books of jurisprudence assumed a formal structure that made Islamic law look as though it were unchanging. . . . But in reality, they continued to develop the law. . . . many countries in the Muslim world have tried to implement reforms without straying from the original message of the Qur’an. At times, this is the result of a reinterpretation (called neo-ijtihad) of the Qur’anic verses. For example, Tunisia has prohibited polygamy outright by reinterpreting the Qur’anic verses. (p. 107 – 108).

On apostasy:

The Qur’an itself minimizes apostasy, discourages it, does not really treat it as a crime, and odes not specify a punishment for it. The Qur’an does not specify the death penalty. In fact, the Qur’an decrees that apostates must be encouraged and given the opportunity to turn back to Islam.

Yet, Muslim medieval jurists developed, a part of their Islamic juristic literature, a law of apostasy that did allow specific punishments and even death to the apostate, though in practice this was rare. Most modern Muslims view apostasy in its historical context and do not consider it applicable to the modern world. In fact, some scholars write that the crime of apostsy in Islamic law only came about because of a misreading of the early written discussions on the subject. (p 115)

On women in Islam: Muhammad meant for Islam to be egalitarian but the scholars interpreting the Qur’an and the Sunnah after his death imposed their own perspectives on their interpretations, for instance, in interpreting sections on beating one’s wife, on inheritance law, the veil, etc. (p. 126 ff). On the veil, interpretations are varied, due to culture and customs, but veiling and headcovering are not required by the Qur’an.

On polygyny:

This is what my Muslim friends and I were taught while growing up and learning our religious tenets: a man can have more than one wife if he can treat them equally, I remember my father saying, but since that is impossible, the Qur’an is actually obliquely limiting a man to one wife. We all regarded polygyny as a historical condition and no longer applicable to the modern world. (p. 142)

Besides which, she says, polygyny was originally a way of helping widows, who would otherwise suffer because there was no provision for them.

About divorce, as with other topics, Ali-Karamali takes the approach that Muhammad was comparatively egalitarian for his time, so that any apparent inequities between men and women should be straightened out based on “the spirit of Islamic law and a reinterpretation of the religious texts” as occurred in Tunisia when men and women were given equal divorce rights. (p. 149)

What about Shari’a courts in Western nations? She rejects the idea of following “the minutiae of divorce law developed over a thousand years ago by Islamic male scholars.”

There’s also a text that seems to endorse hitting one’s wife. After discussing some aspects of interpretation, she says,

Islam is old; the Qur’an is old. We forget history even fifty years old and we forget language three hundred years old. How then — if we are as conscientious as humanly possible — can we be sure of the meaning of every single word in the Qur’an? Given the Qur’an’s equalizing message for women, given the historical context, given the grammar and the plethora of juristic writings and prophetic sayings condemning any kind of wife beating, given all that, I cannot believe the Qur’an meant to allow a man to strike his wife except as a limitation of the particular practices of the seventh century.

On jihad: yes, it’s no surprise that she’s saying what we’ve heard before, that jihad just means personal struggle for self-improvement. With respect to “classical jihad,” that is, the fact that Muslims did in fact conquer vast amounts of territory in its early history, well, she seems to take the view that this was really unconnected to Islam at all and mostly a coincidence that these rulers happened to be Muslim, and, besides, well, empires just “happen” anyway.

And on abrogation, that is, the notion that later verses in the Qur’an “override” earlier verses where they appear to conflict, and, in particular, that verses on fighting (after the Muslims gained strength) supersede earlier verses on peace and tolerance (when Muhammad was trying to convert others):

Abrogation makes little sense to me . . . . Not only does it mean that parts of the Qur’an are read out of context while other parts are ignored, but it imples that God, in all His infinite wisdom, changed his mind. Abrogation was used to allow seventh-century Arabs to reconcile their holy scripture to their comprehension of society. (p. 176)

That’s not the end of the book, but I’m getting tired of what’s turning into a lengthy summary.

Here’s the bottom line.

What Ali-Karamali believes, in brief is this:

God is merciful and compassionate, and answers prayers, and Muhammad, and God by extension, wanted a world of justice between rich and poor and men and women.

While, admittedly, there are passages in the Qur’an which seem to say otherwise, these can be disregarded via various approaches. Some troublesome passages are explained by emphasizing context: e.g., the “sword verses” were based on self-defense. Some passages are contextualized by placing them in 7th century Arabia and saying, “for the time, this was very progressive,” and suggesting that Muhammad would have gone even further in implementing full equality of men and women but for the fact that it wouldn’t have been accepted, so that we can take from it an underlying message of equality. Likewise, some practices are not even supported by the Qur’an but by a patriarchal interpretation, and such interpretations may be abandoned. And when all else fails, any suggestion of unjust or unequal practices can be discarded by acknowledging the multiple meanings of Arabic words, which may have been lost in the meantime, and a certain unknowability of what a passage may have actually meant that now seems, on the face of it, to be unjust or intolerant.

Yet to come: I have a couple more books, and then I will tell you what I make of all this!

Uncategorized

Previous Post

December 18, 2015

"Same God"? What does that even mean?

Next Post

December 22, 2015 From the library: Allah, Liberty, and Love; the Courage to Reconcile Faith and Freedom, by Irshad Manji

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Actuarial/Retirement Issues Politics Uncategorized

Select a Month September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 December 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 August 2021 June 2021 April 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What is the effect of the Red Horse's arrival in revelations?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Peace is taken from the earth People fall into a deep sleep The sun turns black Plagues spread across the land