A few stabs in the dark at saying something of any relevance today

Last updated on: December 3, 2015 at 12:42 pm by Jane the Actuary

A few stabs in the dark at saying something of any relevance today 2015-12-03T12:42:00-06:00 Jane the Actuary

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

I have a facebook friend who right now is keeping track of which prolife organizations, Republicans, and Catholic bishops have gone on record as condemning the “Planned Parenthood shooter,” who is believed to have been motivated by an anti-abortion ideology due to an anonymous source’s claim that he said “no more baby parts” in police questioning. Hence I was thinking about this issue even before yesterday’s events.

In the meantime, we now know that the killers in San Bernardino were a married couple. The husband, the son of Pakistani immigrants (per, among other sources, Slate), had met his wife online via a Middle Eastern marriage site, traveled to Saudi Arabia, and returned with her two years ago, according to the LA Times. He was described as devout Muslim by his father, and, even without knowing what opinions and plans he brought with him from Saudi Arabia, or whether his wife “radicalized” him, I think it’s fair to assume that the fact that he was looking abroad for a wife suggests, at a minimum, a fundamentalism, if not an extremism, to his beliefs.

(Incidentally, at this point, the most comprehensive description of the events seems to be from the Daily Mail; there are also more details in this Fox News account.)

Of course, articles such as Slate are careful to say that we don’t know their motivation and even hesitate to suggest that this was a premeditated action, with such cautious language as: “Farook and Malik were dressed in “tactical” combat gear—black clothes and masks—suggesting that the attack was at least somewhat premeditated.” Somewhat premeditated? How on earth can you imagine that a narrative of someone upsetting him at that holiday party and he spontaneously ran outside, grabbed his waiting wife and gear of various kinds, and came back in to shoot, makes any sense at all? We’re also being told that we should still withhold judgement, but certainly an ISIS-like motivation is most probable, and the fact that the attack was so carefully planned in coordination with his wife and others (that is, neighbor’s reports of frequent visits, at all hours, by middle-eastern men, and a house with pipe bombs), make it highly unlikely that this was a case of “workplace violence” or the result of mental illness.

But we’re back to the same question, or pair of questions.

Do groups with whom the shooter has some connection, have an obligation to condemn the attack and “prove” to the community at large their innocence? And do they bear any blame for the attack?

The easy answer to both is “no.” Of course it’s foolish to demand that every individual who has ever taken a pro-life stand, or made an Islamic profession of faith, condemn these acts via twitter, facebook, or other online forums. And the mere fact that an individual shares your causes, and chooses violence, should in no way prevent you from being able to advocate peacefully.

But the extent that an organization has a public face, it never hurts to say things like, from a right-to-life perspective: “If you think you can defend babies by shooting abortion clinic workers, or by any use of violence, please understand that this is wrong, and that it’ll harm the cause you’re trying to serve,” or, from a Muslim perspective, “If you think you’re serving God by killing infidels, you are wrong, and you will go to Hell.” In fact, let’s call this the “press conference test”: if your group has enough prominence that you can call a press conference and have the media show up, then maybe you should do so — not to wail about unjust accusations of culpability but simply to state clearly that anyone who thinks they’re furthering the cause by turning to violence is wrong.

In addition: well, quite some time ago (pre-Patheos, back in January), I wrote a piece I called “Islam needs a ‘Jewish Enlightenment’“, that is, a way of understanding their scriptures in a non-literal way, similar to the transformation of Judaism in Germany with the Reform movement, and similar modern understandings of Christian scriptures (that is, the understanding, for instance, that Noah’s Ark is not a retelling of an actual, historical event). As a postscript to that piece, I mentioned a Chicago Tribune article on the Muslim community in the Chicago area, genuinely wrestling with how to keep their children away from radicalism. Ayaan Hirsi Ali (per her book Heretic) believes that Muslims need to make fundamental changes to the whole of their belief system because it leads inexorably to extremism. Without commenting on her claims specifically, it is true in general that as people who live in a world with other people, we have a moral obligation, as we live our lives, to consider whether our passion for our causes transforms us into people we don’t want to be, and perhaps transforms others as well. And I say that generically without reference to a specific cause, and without addressing when one has crossed a line, and certainly without comment as to whether someone loses the right to speak out.

Uncategorized

Previous Post

December 2, 2015

What if diversity is our . . . liability?

Next Post

December 4, 2015 Some common sense on "prayer-shaming"?

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Actuarial/Retirement Issues Politics Uncategorized

Select a Month September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 December 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 August 2021 June 2021 April 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What is the longest Gospel?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Luke Matthew Mark John