The Pope’s Speech

Last updated on: September 25, 2015 at 5:55 am by Jane the Actuary

The Pope’s Speech 2015-09-25T05:55:01-06:00 Jane the Actuary

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

I admit — this feels like homework. Not in the sense that I feel obliged to write about the Pope, as a Patheos blogger, because I have gotten myself trapped in blogging, it’s not fun anymore, whine, whine, whine. Not really. More in the sense that feel obliged, not as a blogger, but as a Catholic, to read the speech, after having seen a steady stream of opinion on it on facebook and twitter.

What was the speech about? Here are my notes:

He says he’s addressing Congress, and the “entire people of the United States,” the workers, the elderly, and the young people.

He structures his speech around for Americans with key anniversaries: Abraham (150th anniversary of his assination), Martin Luther King (50th anniversary of the Selma March), Dorothy Day (anniversary = ???), and Thomas Merton (100th anniversary of his birth).

Lincoln represents freedom, but, he says, “Building a future of freedom requires love of the common good and cooperation in a spirit of subsidiarity and solidarity,” and then says that “A delicate balance is required to combat violence perpetrated in the name of a religion, an ideology or an economic system, while also safeguarding religious freedom, intellectual freedom and individual freedoms.” He sounds a bit like a Jedi knight — even in the name of fighting evil, one must not become consumed by anger. Or something like that, maybe.

Then he talks about King and his “dream” and segues into the dreams of immigrants, and speaks in vague terms about the fate of indigenous peoples, and then says we must not turn our backs on our “neighbors.”

He references the refugee crisis in Europe, and the northward flow from Mexico to the U.S., and says, “We must not be taken aback by their numbers, but rather view them as persons, seeing their faces and listening to their stories, trying to respond as best we can to their situation. To respond in a way which is always humane, just and fraternal.” Open immigration supporters will view this as a call for amnesty, but it feels too vague to label this a direct call for a legalization program. In any case, it sounds much more directed at the much more immediate situation in Europe.

Francis then pulls out the Golden Rule, and an incidental, obligatory, “protect and defend human life at every state of development,” and a paragraph on death penalty opposition, and some words on rehabilitation (which feel out of place when we’re talking about the worst of the worst, who will not be released in any case — unless he simply means the opportunity for said prisoner to repent?).

He then mentions Dorothy Day, but, again, without any special anniversary connected with her. (I could find nothing in her wikipedia entry, either.) And referencing her poverty-fighting efforts, he says, “How much progress has been made in this area in so many parts of the world! How much has been done in these first years of the third millennium to raise people out of extreme poverty!” and “It goes without saying that part of this great effort is the creation and distribution of wealth. The right use of natural resources, the proper application of technology and the harnessing of the spirit of enterprise are essential elements of an economy which seeks to be modern, inclusive and sustainable. “Business is a noble vocation, directed to producing wealth and improving the world. It can be a fruitful source of prosperity for the area in which it operates, especially if it sees the creation of jobs as an essential part of its service to the common good” (Laudato Si’, 129).” Then he calls upon Americans to use technology to create “another type of progress, one which is healthier, more human, more social, more integral.”

Francis then moves on to Merton, “a promoter of peace between peoples and religions,” and says, “I would like to recognize the efforts made in recent months to help overcome historic differences linked to painful episodes of the past.” He doesn’t mention specifics, so I’m guessing that he is referring to the Iran nuclear deal.

He then goes back to the arms trade, offering what appears to be a too-facile explanation of war as due to greedy arms dealers.

He’s now finished with his Four Americans, and moves on to the World Meeting of Families, making oblique reference to gay marriage, and perhaps the larger numbers of cohabitating couples and single parents. Of families themselves, he then focuses on “the young,” many of whom “seem disoriented and aimless, trapped in a hopeless maze of violence, abuse and despair.” Is he talking about children? He seems more to be referring to young adults, which doesn’t really fit with his theme of family, as this is the age group that doesn’t participate in family life, neither as mothers and fathers, nor as dependent children. And then he spends two sentences fretting that some young people are pressured not to start a family because they have no hope for the future, and others are having too much fun to start a family. Where did this come from? Has he spent too much time in Italy (fertility rate 1.42 children per woman)?

Then some few closing words, and a closing sentence, “ It is my desire that this spirit continue to develop and grow, so that as many young people as possible can inherit and dwell in a land which has inspired so many people to dream.” What does this mean? One would expect that last sentence to express the hope that the next generation may experience the fulfillment of those dreams. But is he really talking simply about maximizing the population, that is, that we should admit as immigrants as many people as we possibly can without the country collapsing?

So all in all, it just didn’t do anything for me. It’s not just about the wishy-washiness of the abortion reference. There we too many cryptic, vague references. His schema of the Four Americans didn’t really work for me, and felt too disjointed. His buzzwords of subsidiarity and solidarity don’t resonate with me. Was this supposed to rally his supporters to action? To convert skeptics?

But I’ve now done my homework. Good night!

Morning update: everyone’s plucking sound bites to talk about. But a speech like this is, or ought to be, about more than just ticking off boxes of topics and connecting together a series of grand statements. Do you see something bigger? Did it speak to you? Help you to see something in a different light? What did I miss?

Uncategorized

Previous Post

September 24, 2015

Slate gets it wrong on the Holocaust

Next Post

September 25, 2015 Are you a financial planner?

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Actuarial/Retirement Issues Politics Uncategorized

Select a Month September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 December 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 August 2021 June 2021 April 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What does "Golgotha" literally mean?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Place of death Crucifixion hill Skull place Suffering ground