Don’t defund Planned Parenthood – dismember them

Last updated on: January 22, 2016 at 8:10 am by Jane the Actuary

Don’t defund Planned Parenthood – dismember them 2016-01-22T08:10:01-06:00 Jane the Actuary

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Figuratively, of course.

But it’s kind of fitting, isn’t it? Planned Parenthood’s abortion providers dismember unborn babies. And that’s precisely the solution to the current debate about Planned Parenthood.

Wesley J Smith proposed this back in July, so this isn’t truly an original idea here, but his suggestion never got any traction, so it bears repeating:

Planned Parenthood should be broken up into discrete pieces in the same way ATT was once dismembered. The new organization could be strictly prohibited from providing abortion services with a wall of separation between old and new with regard to finances, leadership, etc. That new entity would still be eligible for funding.

The existing organization could continue aborting without our dollars. I am sure it would be bounteously funded from those of a certain ideological persuasion.

This makes a tremendous amount of sense to me. Heck, the existing organization could be the one providing contraception and STD testing and could still be called Planned Parenthood, and the new organization could call itself, oh, I don’t know, Abortion Services, Inc. I suppose the new organization could even be a non-profit, in the same way as most hospitals are non-profit, though if there is ever reform that demands that non-profits be required to do truly charitable things with their profits, they’d be swept up in that reform just as much as “non-profit” hospitals who use their profits for regular building expansions rather than to provide healthcare for the needy.

How far should the Wall of Separation go? Would Planned Parenthood be allowed to permit an abortion provider to use its space on a periodic basis? Maybe, I suppose, in the same way as other doctors share office space while maintaining separate practices financially, in terms of personnel, scheduling, etc. And certainly the fees paid should be market-rate, rather than the abortion-providing entity receiving a hefty discount, and Planned Parenthood should be required to treat them as a genuinely separate entity, rather than an affiliate or a preferred provider.

Jeb Bush brought up the Reagan Rule in the September 16 CNN debate, and I did a little digging on this. According to the linked article, the policy

prohibited Title X projects “from engaging in counseling concerning, referrals for, and activities advocating abortion as a method of family planning, and require[d] such projects to maintain an objective integrity and independence from the prohibited abortion activities by the use of separate facilities, personnel, and accounting records.”

But the rule was promulgated in 1988, and immediately challenged. But the time the court challenges were completed and the rule was upheld, Clinton was in office, and immediately rescinded it, so we’ve never seen it in action.

Was this intended, in fact, to require that Title X providers wholly separate themselves from the abortion service component of their businesses? It doesn’t look like it went that far, but a break-up of Planned Parenthood (and also of similar family planning funding recipients who simultaneously provide abortions) would be, functionally, the only real way to implement this, and would certainly be more likely to succeed than a bill targeting Planned Parenthood by name specifically.

Now, is “dismember Planned Parenthood” — or “dismantle them” or “break them up” — an inspiring rallying cry? Does it satisfy our desire to punish Cecile Richards and the others in the top leadership? Not really, and I haven’t got a clever hashtag to offer. #We’reOKwithContraceptionandCheckupsButSpinOffYourAbortionBusiness don’t really seem to do the trick. But it’s a practical approach that has at least a non-zero chance of succeeding.

Uncategorized

abortion

Planned Parenthood

Previous Post

September 28, 2015

Some data on retirement savings

Next Post

September 29, 2015 You know cancer sucks when. . .

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Actuarial/Retirement Issues Politics Uncategorized

Select a Month September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 December 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 August 2021 June 2021 April 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

How many chapters does Genesis have?

Select your answer to see how you score.

55 27 66 50