Patheos

BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Patheos

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

janetheactuary

Dear Prudence, Maslow, robots, and an intentionally vague post title

Last updated on: September 19, 2015 at 3:25 pm   by Jane the Actuary

Dear Prudence, Maslow, robots, and an intentionally vague post title 2015-09-19T11:22:14-06:00 Jane the Actuary

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

In which I talk about sex, sex robots, and “needs”:

Here’s a Q&A from a Dear Prudence column from earlier this week at Slate.

My husband and I have been married for almost two years. We are deeply in love and have a passionate sex life. He’s amazing and I’m incredibly blessed. There’s one point of tension that pops up that I need your help with. Before we got married, he told me about his struggle with pornography. He recognized its negative influence in his life and our relationship. It was our understanding that he would work through it. There have been several “relapses,” if you will, throughout our relationship, but he keeps promising to do better. Recently, I discovered he’d been lying about his progress for months. He’d been looking every few days and would even look while lying right next to me in bed as I slept. I support him as best I can, while dealing with my own negative emotions. I do believe that he does want to conquer this, but the lies and, to me, what feels like betrayal are wrecking an otherwise wonderful marriage. Do you have any suggestions on what to do from here?

A: I was waiting for you to say your husband’s struggled with viewing child pornography, or that his obsession with pornography was such that he downloaded it at work, thus jeopardizing his job. But your objection appears to be that he views pornography. You don’t in any way explain its insidious effect on your marriage. If a husband’s erotic life is pulled away from his partner and replaced with a masturbatory response to images on his computer, that’s a problem. But you say you two have a passionate sex life. Some women believe looking at pornography is the equivalent of cheating. It’s not. You complain he looks at it in bed, after you have fallen asleep. But if you’re asleep, how do you know what he’s looking at? If your objection is that his viewing porn hurts your feelings, get over it. You went into this marriage knowing he had this proclivity. As long as it’s not actually affecting your life, ignore it.

Commenters backed up “Prudie” with statements such as “men have a biological need for sex, so if he’s getting his release by watching porn and masturbating, what’s it to her?” (I’d quote a specific comment but I read these comments a couple days ago and now there’s another thousand or so.)

In the meantime, sex robots have made their way into the news, with Professor Kathleen Richardson at De Montfort University in the UK making the news for voicing concern about them.  This became something of a joke — “feminists oppose sex robots because they know that if men could just have sex with robots, they’d stop bothering with women, and women wouldn’t be able to find anyone to take care of them” (sorry, I can’t find the particular blog posts any longer — this is what happens when you let an idea percolate for too long before writing about it).  But her legitimate point of concern seems to be this, though I can’t find a single quote that spells it out:  men who use sex robots may come to view sex as a mechanical act, and treat living, breathing partners as property, in the same way as they do their sex robot.

Or at least that’s my take-away.  I admit to not having read the “position paper“, and her concern is largely about prostitutes and concerns for greater mistreatment. But it is worth thinking about, in one respect:  Prudie and her readers agree that a porn + masturbation combo is a matter of a man meeting his biological need, nothing more, and nothing that his wife or partner has any right to complain about.  (The latter is not directly addressed here, but a commenter connect this to a prior letter on that subject.)  How far does this go?  How far might this go, extrapolating from present trends?  Is a “sex robot” just another sort of masturbation?  Will a future letter-writer complain that her husband has been making use of sex robots, and a future Prudie scold her that she should MYOB and it’s none of her business whether he chooses to do this, or play golf, with his Saturday afternoons?

And this “sex as biological need” bit?  Yes, I know it comes from Maslow’s hierarchy of needs, although Wikipedia is vague on the matter, implying that Maslow was referring to an “instinct” for sex and the need for the species to reproduce; other places I looked online didn’t provide any clarification.  But Prudie’s readers take it as a given: first, that post-pubescent human beings, or at least men, need sex in one form or another, and, second, that this physiological need for “sexual release” is mechanical and of no greater connection to morality than the physiological need for food, water, or warmth, and wholly separate from human relationships.

And given that mindset, will folks who get their moral thinking from Prudie even draw the line at machines, or will they also conclude that a man who “satisfies his sexual needs” with a flesh-and-blood “other woman” is likewise in the right, and the complaining spouse wrong?

Uncategorized

Previous Post



September 19, 2015

"VW Games Emissions Tests" -- odd news of the day, or something more?

Next Post



September 19, 2015 On the "clock-bomb", hoaxes, and thoughtcrime


Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Actuarial/Retirement Issues Politics Uncategorized

Select a Month September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 December 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 August 2021 June 2021 April 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013


Follow Us!

Follow Us on Facebook Follow Us on Twitter



TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What principle does "love covers a multitude of sins" teach?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Pride is good Forgiveness and mercy Revenge is best Jealousy wins

Related posts from Jane the Actuary

Family

A September 11th Reflection

Jane the Actuary

Family

Illinois’ Assisted Suicide Law is, yes, literally deadly

Jane the Actuary

Family

Revising the "Disability [Pride] Flag"

Jane the Actuary

Family

In which I comment on the Supreme Court...

Jane the Actuary

TRENDING AT PATHEOS Catholic

The Iron Gates and the Lion of the...

  Yesterday, I didn't finish my report about, well, yesterday.  So I'll...

Dolly Parton’s Last Song Wins Dove Award with...

Bluegrass band The Grascals, speaking on the red carpet at the 57th...

The Image: On the Horror of Capitalism and...

The Image Then went the Pharisees, and took counsel how they might...

Thoughts about Halloween

We are approaching the date of our new American national holiday: October...

Letters on Living the Faith by C.S. Lewis

Most of us met C.S. Lewis as a public intellectual. Mere Christianity....

When Halloween Unmasks Married Hearts

Written by Dr. David K. Ewen from Eternal Truth Bible College Behind...

view all Catholic blogs

Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube